Nutrition

The pulse feast
By Christian Thibaudeau | 01/13/11
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/pulse-feast
The author of this article has stumbled upon the holy grail of body transformation: a nutritional strategy that allows him to build muscle and maintain defined, visible abs - all without having to worry about food.
But this is not what you might think. Like the story with the blind man who found himself in a room with an elephant, we've discovered parts of this strategy before. But now someone has put those pieces together into a simple plan that works shockingly well.
Oh yes, you can feast in the evening. Bonus!
This nutrition strategy is the next big thing in muscle building nutrition science.
The Pulse Feast
The problem: if I have food there, I eat it!
As a former fat kid, dieting has fascinated me my whole life. I've always had a love-hate relationship with food and I'm always looking for ways to get lean and stay happy at the same time. And the latter is really important.
When I was training for bodybuilding purposes, I used a low-carb approach with six meals a day and got really super lean with it. But I had two problems with eating this way. Even though it made me lean, I felt bad all the time. I wanted to kill everyone and I had no social life. I was robbed of all the pleasures of life.
The second problem was that after a bodybuilding competition, I put on weight in leaps and bounds. Even though I knew better, I was a yo-yo dieter.
The problem I had with a traditional bodybuilding diet - six to eight small meals a day - is that my psychological profile gives me a tendency to binge. I can force myself not to eat for two or three days, no problem. As long as I don't start eating, I have no psychological desire to eat.
However, once food enters my mouth - whether this is based on a neurological response or a hormonal response (because I'm producing too much insulin) - I simply can't stop eating. If food is available, I will definitely eat it.
Eating six small meals a day was like being irritated by an attractive woman six times a day and not being able to touch her. I was constantly suffering. This made me angry at food and angry at life.
It got so bad that to avoid going off track, I had virtually no food at home. I actually went shopping six times a day to buy the ingredients for each meal separately! What else could I have done? If I had six meals at home at the same time, I would have eaten all that food at once.
As you can see, it was impossible for me to eat six small meals a day and stay sane. I was losing body fat, but I felt miserable. So I started looking for ways to stay lean while enjoying life.
Let's face it, it's one thing to get super lean for one week a year and it's another thing to stay reasonably lean all year round. Personally, I'd rather have an 8% body fat percentage all year round and be happy than feel bad about getting to a 4% body fat percentage for a month and then gaining up to 14% body fat for the rest of the year. I had to find a solution!
My experiments
Experiment 1 - Defined but losing muscle mass
The first strategy I found appealing was Ori Hofmekler's Warrior Diet. The basic idea of this diet strategy is to fast (eat no food) throughout the day and then eat a lot in the evening.
I found this strategy appealing as it seemed to be the ultimate solution: I could eat whatever I wanted and still stay slim. This diet suited my psychological profile. I didn't have to eat for 18 hours, which made this diet strategy quite easy for me.
I started this diet straight after a bodybuilding competition. I wanted to stay in competition shape and still eat everything I wanted. I stayed very lean, had a lot of energy, but I lost some muscle mass.
The plan suited my needs the whole time, but I knew that slowly progressing muscle loss was not what I wanted in the long term.
Experiment 2 - Lean while maintaining muscle mass
I tried several different strategies to improve on the basic "fast and then eat" idea. I took BCAAs throughout the day to prevent a catabolic state. I still wasn't building muscle mass, but adding the BCAAs seemed to prevent muscle loss and also kept my strength up.
This new strategy was better than the original plan. It worked, but it had its limitations. Maintaining muscle was great, but it still wasn't enough for me. I wanted to build muscle.
Experiment 3 - Defined with muscle gains!
Not long after, I read about protein hydrolysate with a high degree of hydrolysis and a high proportion of di- and tripeptides. All I had to do was use protein hydrolysate pulses throughout the day
Once I had obtained one of these protein hydrolysates, I started to use pulses of protein during the day and then feast on them in the evening. In addition to this, I combined the pulse protein boosts with a good dose of creatine each time.
This was the first time I was able to eat what I wanted, stay lean and actually build strength and muscle mass.
Over the last year I have used different protein pulse strategies throughout the day and only eat one big meal at the end of the day. Now I eat like this almost every day and the results are better than I ever expected - and I feel great doing it!
The perfect metabolic efficiency
The Pulse Binge strategy - two large pulse-like protein bursts during the day and one large meal in the evening - combined with a stimulation of anabolic physiology, makes you metabolically efficient. And with continued use, you'll be able to build muscle and strength, stay lean, stay mentally healthy and stop obsessing about food.
Most people don't want to step onto a bodybuilding stage. But almost everyone wants to look lean and not feel bad about getting and staying lean. They also want to have the energy and mental focus to exercise or participate in any athletic activity they want to participate in. And with this plan, you can have all of that - without your entire schedule having to revolve around your diet.
No more packing Tupperware containers to take with you everywhere and no more freaking out when you can't eat solid food every three hours.
Have a few pulse-like protein hydrolysate spurts during the day and eat practically anything you want at night. It's easy, it's stress-free and it's the most effective strategy I've ever used for building muscle and getting lean.
Let's analyze the strategy.
Phase 1 - pulse-like protein boosts in the morning and afternoon
From the time you get up in the morning until about 7:00 pm, you will consume two large pulse-like protein boosts, which equates to one boost in the morning and one boost four or five hours later.
Each protein boost consists of 30 grams of protein hydrolysate. You consume these two protein boosts in addition to your nutritional protocol around your training. So on training days you get a third boost of anabolic nutrients through your training nutrition.
I have paid a lot of attention to this dosing protocol. I've scoured all the available scientific literature, discussed the protocol with different scientists and experimented with all the variables.
In summary, the science matches my personal experience -that in addition to nutrition around training, two large pulse-like protein bursts separated by four or five hours work best. Here's the explanation for this:
The goal is to flood the bloodstream with massive amounts of dipeptides, tripeptides and amino acids, move these nutrients out of the blood and into muscle cells and other target tissues, and then return the bloodstream's amino acid concentration to baseline at least an hour before the next protein pulse.
To keep the body maximally responsive to the effects of the pulse-like protein surges, you must have periods during which the bloodstream "pauses" at its amino acid baseline. And with the two large pulsed protein bursts, the two-serving dosing protocol provides just enough time for all of this to work.
In other words, a two-pulse protein delivery requires more time for the bloodstream amino acid concentration to fall back to baseline and you have just enough time to use two pulse protein boosts and still use another large protein pulse during a training session.
In my experience, this dosing protocol produces maximum anabolic benefits while keeping the body highly susceptible to the effects.
Here's what I do:
I usually train at 5:00 pm, which is why I take a protein boost shortly after I get up in the morning and another protein boost in the early afternoon. At 5pm when I train, I use another boost of protein hydrolysate combined with some functional carbs for my nutrition protocol around training.
Phase 2 - Feasting!
After 19:00, the feasting begins. However, there are a few rules to follow depending on your goals:
Goal - Get or stay slim
If your main goal is a single-digit body fat percentage, then your evening feast will consist of one meal. Even though you can basically eat anything you want, your feasting needs to be a little more structured for ultimate slimness.
Start feasting with a focus on animal foods and vegetables. In other words, start with protein (meat, fish, eggs, etc.) and then add some vegetables. And if you still want to eat after this, then you can eat fruit.
Rule of thumb: the fatter you are, the more restrictive you need to be in your food choices. Feast, but watch the carbohydrates.
Goal - Maintain the current state
I don't like the term "maintenance". Even though I'm not specifically trying to get super lean or build large amounts of muscle mass quickly, I'm always striving to improve.
Let's call this "maintenance" for simplicity's sake. This is where you will find yourself during most of the year. I use this strategy myself for about 80% of the year.
During "maintenance" you basically eat what you want during a predetermined phase of the fast. I prefer 7:00pm to 11:00pm. Again, start with protein and vegetables and only then eat pasta, cereal or even dessert if you want to.
Goal - muscle mass
If your main goal is to build lean muscle mass, increase your carbohydrate intake and overall food intake during your evening hours of feasting. You still need to start your feast with protein, but after this you have more leeway than those whose goal is to get very lean.
The psychology of nutrient partitioning
I believe that the psychological state you are in when you eat affects nutrient partitioning. If you are stressed or have a negative opinion about your food, then you may be storing more nutrients as fat.
Pulse feasting is a stress-free way to eat. You don't have to feel guilty when you feast because feasting is part of the plan and is even necessary.
This could be related to the "stingy gene" hypothesis. The body is designed to function in cycles of high activity and low food intake, followed by low activity and high food intake. In other words, it is fasting and feasting.
If you are in a high activity mode, then you are not in a state to properly absorb nutrients and store them as usable energy - you are not as efficient. If you are stressed - psychologically or physically - then you will not be as efficient in your eating.
With this plan, you will enjoy your meal because you know your body is prepared to use the nutrients. You've fasted for 18 hours in combination with anabolic protein boosts, which is why you won't get fat. The lack of stress and worry will contribute to the positive effect of this strategy. You can enjoy your meal without stress and guilt and achieve better results in terms of developing your body composition.
The Pulse Feasting Introductory Phase
If you've been reading bodybuilding and fitness magazines for the last 20 years, you've been trained to eat every three hours. But this is a psychological need, not a physical one. What I have found for myself is that this is a bad habit and is not necessary for muscle growth or high performance training.
To help you break this habit, you could use a traditional pulse fast before you start pulse feasting. Pulse fasting consists of a short fast for 36 hours during which you consume mainly pulse-like spurts of protein hydrolysate plus some nutrition around your workout.
Pulse Fasting will prepare your body for the powerful metabolic rebound effect and muscle gains instead of fat storage. In addition, this introductory phase will show you that you don't have to eat all day long to grow. And you don't have to panic about getting into a catabolic state if you don't eat a mouthful of chicken and rice every minute of the day.
I would recommend you get a few non-consecutive days of pulse fasting under your belt before you start the pulse feasting strategy.
Pulse Feasting Summary
In summary, here is what pulse feasting does:
Pulse Feasting...
- Stimulates anabolic physiology for maximum gains in lean muscle mass while preventing fat gain.
- Drives nutrients into the muscles and stops fat storage.
- Improves the function of the digestive system, making it more efficient at breaking down food and utilizing the nutrients it contains.
- Removes stress and guilt from eating.
- Gives you more time in the morning and afternoon - no more packing food for everywhere you go and no panic if you can't eat every two or three hours.
- Makes eating enjoyable again and does so at the time of day when you have more freedom to relax, prepare good food and enjoy it with your family and friends.
- Trains your body to become more metabolically efficient when you eat "normally", like during a vacation, so you don't get fat.
Pulse Feast sample plan
|
Time |
Training in the evening |
Late morning workout |
Early morning workout |
Non-workout day |
|
7:00 a.m. |
Protein pulse |
Protein pulse |
training |
Protein pulse |
|
8:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
9:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
11:00 a.m. |
|
workout |
Protein pulse |
Protein pulse |
|
12:00 pm |
Protein pulse |
|
|
|
|
13:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
14:00 h |
|
|
|
|
|
3:00 p.m. |
|
Protein pulse |
Protein pulse |
Protein pulse |
|
16:00 h |
|
|
|
|
|
17:00 |
Training |
|
|
|
|
6:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
7:00 pm |
Feasting |
Feast |
Feasting |
Feasting |
Instructions for pulse protein intake
Each pulse-style protein boost consists of 30 grams of protein hydrolysate with a high degree of hydrolysis and a high proportion of di- and tripeptides. You can prepare both portions the evening before or in the morning so that you can drink them at the specified times. The finished mixture is best kept in the refrigerator.
It's simple and highly effective
Use a pulse-style protein intake with a high-quality protein hydrolyzate during the day and eat what you want in the evening.
Less stress, less body fat, more muscle?
What more could you want?
Related blog posts:

What you need to know...
- Soy protein is practically useless for stimulating muscle protein synthesis.
- Detoxing the liver or "cleansing" the gut with coffee enemas is beyond stupid.
- Stop worrying about growth hormones in milk.
- You can't starve cancer by eliminating sugar from your diet.
- You don't have to consume all your micronutrients in one day. Instead, you can look at your diet in blocks of two or three days, or even by the week.
- The "hormone-free" label on poultry is unnecessary and misleading.
- People who drink skim milk build up more fat than people who drink whole milk.
- Stop being neurotic about fructose.
- Eating turkey will not make you sleepy.
1 - Hey, soy may make your eggs shrivel, but at least it's good protein!
About 15 years ago, I broke the news to the physique world that some studies had shown that soy resulted in testicular shrinkage and lower testosterone levels. Despite this, some people are still adamant that soy protein is at least a good muscle building protein.
They had at least one argument for this, even if it wasn't particularly valid. Their reasoning was that soy protein differs from soy in that the isoflavones, which are blamed for lowering testosterone levels and testicular shrinkage, are removed during the soy protein manufacturing process and are therefore no longer present in the final product.
This may or may not be true, as some reports indicate that isoflavones are indeed present in some soy protein products. Regardless of which position you support, recent research gives us an entirely different reason to avoid soy.
A McMaster University study found that soy protein is no better than water when it comes to muscle protein synthesis. The scientists gave 30 men 0 grams of protein, 20 grams of soy or 40 grams of soy at rest and after resistance training. They then compared the results with a group of men who had used 20 or 40 grams of whey protein instead.
While 40 grams of soy slightly increased muscle protein synthesis, 20 grams of soy worked just as well as 0 grams of soy. However, muscle protein synthesis was significantly increased in the groups that consumed 20 or 40 grams of whey protein. The scientists theorized that whey protein worked so well (and soy not so well) because whey protein contains a much higher percentage of leucine - the primary amino acid for muscle building - than soy protein.
In addition, a higher percentage of the amino acids in soy protein - including leucine - are oxidized, making them unavailable for protein synthesis.
If you want to build muscle, then it's certainly best to avoid soy protein until the unlikely event that a miracle study convinces us that all soy-related problems have been solved.
2 - Your liver is a dumping ground! Detoxify it!
At some point, some well-meaning naturopath, herbalist or anal fetishist has come up with the idea that our bodies need periodic cleanses.
Advocates of this idea argue that the air, water and food we breathe and eat are overloaded with toxic chemicals. The naturopath and the herbalist recommend that we occasionally abstain from eating solid food and instead sip a nasty mixture of cabbage, celery and beets to cleanse ourselves of these toxins.
The anal fetishist argues that we should instead use the back entrance and flush our bowels with water, coffee or kitty litter (bentonite) to flush out the toxins.
Well, they're all half right.
The air, water and food we breathe or eat are indeed loaded with toxic chemicals, but the body has a fairly efficient detoxification system that includes our liver, kidneys and spleen. Furthermore, there is no generally accepted evidence that juice helps these organs do their job more efficiently.
However, these systems need nutritional support. Paradoxically, fasting deprives the liver of amino acids (cysteine, glutamine, glycine) that are needed for this natural detoxification process. Furthermore, amino acids make toxins more water-soluble, making it possible to remove them via bile acid.
And colon cleansing? That's just too ridiculous and stupid to even go into.
3 - The growth hormones in milk will make you grow a second head!
Stop this growth hormone phobia already. Yes, some sectors of the dairy industry use growth hormones to increase milk production and yes, some of this does seem to make its way into the milk we consume. Big deal.
Growth hormones are huge protein molecules that, once consumed, are broken down into their amino acid components in the digestive tract - just like milk and other proteins that have to go through the wild ride through your digestive system.
That said, these are growth hormones for cows and unless one of your parents was a ruminant with four stomachs wearing a bell around its neck, these growth hormones won't have any effect on you anyway.
4 - Cancer feeds on gummy bears!
In 2007, some bastard spread an internet hoax titled "Cancer Update from John Hopkins." Among other things, this article stated that cancer feeds on certain foods like sugar.
This scared the hell out of cancer patients all over the world and made many of them avoid sugar. Things got even worse when the honorable show 60 Minutes aired a program in 2012 about a doctor who made pretty much the same claim.
Fear-driven cancer patients began purging their cupboards of anything that might contain sugar. The problem here is that many things contain sugar, and if you know anything about cancer patients, you know that one of the biggest problems they face is getting enough calories and nutrients, which is primarily related to the fact that they often lose their appetite due to chemotherapy.
There are several obvious problems associated with inadequate nutritional intake, but one of these is particularly serious. Studies from the 1980s that looked at malnutrition in AIDS patients tell us that, regardless of anything else going on in our bodies, once our body weight falls below 66% of our ideal weight, we die. Therefore, cancer patients need to eat everything possible to keep their calorie intake high enough.
That being said, cancer does not feed on sugar per se. Sure, it will use sugar, but since Adolf Krebs, who discovered the famous Krebs cycle, started chopping up pigeon breasts in his lab, we know that the common metabolic intermediate for any energy requirement is 6-carbon sugar molecules, which includes all carbohydrates, not just sugar.
Can you starve cancer cells to death by eliminating all carbohydrates? Maybe, but everything else will suffer before the cancer is starved. So this cancer/sugar myth is a myth that should be dispelled as soon as possible.
Oh yes, people might want to remember that simply appearing on TV does not automatically confer real expert status on the person in question. Producers book people based on controversy and fads, not caring about the consequences.
5 - Oh no! Giant chickens with gyno are coming to get us!
I suppose it's commendable that moms who mean well dig around in the freezer section of the supermarket looking for chicken labeled "hormone free" or "natural," but this is wasted motherly love.
The "hormone-free" label is redundant and manipulative, since the use of hormones is banned in poultry anyway. As for the "natural" label, this simply means that there are no artificial additives or preservatives in the chicken, but this applies to almost any poultry in any supermarket.
And while we're on the subject of labels: The "free-range" label suggests that the chickens live an idyllic life, foraging on the prairie for grasshoppers and the meaning of life.
Unfortunately, this label really just means that you have access to the outside, which may just mean that there's a hole in the wall that they could theoretically squeeze through to get outside, or that they may have access to a small fenced-in concrete area that's right next to a highway.
6 - Oh no! I didn't get my daily requirement of riboflavin!
I've written about how people who only eat foods with a high nutrient density can theoretically eat as much as they want without gaining weight. The 'trick', of course, is that foods with a high nutrient density are usually not particularly calorific and so you automatically fill up on low calorie foods so you don't gain weight.
However, I have found that there is a subset of people who manage to get fat despite eating a 'healthy' diet. They have obviously found a loophole in my argument and are shamelessly exploiting it.
Here's what happens: They'll eat breakfast. They'll order eggs and wholemeal toast with organic butter. And some yogurt. And granola. Oh yes, some orange juice and a bowl of fruit. And bacon. I almost forgot the bacon.
They've internalized the idea of whole foods and nutrient dense foods, but they've taken it to an absurd extreme by trying to get all their nutrients at every meal. As a result, their calorie intake is off the charts. Despite their sensible food choices, they are getting fatter and fatter.
They have neglected the fact that they don't need to get all their nutrients at every meal. It's like the old beans and rice thing practiced by vegetarians. Rice lacks the amino acids lysine and threonine, so you need to combine rice with beans to get a complete protein, since beans contain the lysine and threonine that rice lacks.
Well, that's true so far, but you don't have to eat these foods as part of the same meal. You can eat your rice and have some lysine-rich food later in the day.
You don't even have to get all your micronutrients in one day. Instead, you can look at your diet in blocks of two or three days, or even weekly blocks. Although there are daily requirements for many vitamins, many others are stored for later use.
An extreme example is the daily requirement for vitamin B12, which is about the size of the dot at the end of this sentence. However, the body recycles some vitamin B12 and stores can last from 5 months to 30 years before any deficiency becomes apparent.
Eat foods with a high nutrient density, but there is no need to consume every macronutrient, vitamin, mineral, phytochemical or antioxidant with every meal, you fat bastard in waiting.
7 - Whole milk is what they used to kill Rasputin!
For years, America treated whole milk as if it was a liquid medium used to carry the Ebola virus. People thought that whole milk made them fat, raised their cholesterol and hardened their arteries, so they chose low-fat or fat-free milk, which is kind of like the Claustaler of milk - i.e. colored water.
Surprisingly, plenty of evidence has emerged showing that those who drank whole milk (and ate high-fat dairy products in general) were less likely to get fat than those who consumed the low-fat versions.
The studies appear to be consistent and significant - no three-person pool of subjects and no studies funded by a company that had a financial interest in a particular study outcome. One of the studies monitored men who ate high-fat dairy products over a 12-year period and the other study was a meta-analysis that included 16 studies. Both showed that a high-fat diet was associated with a lower risk of obesity.
The theory that remains to be proven is that high-fat milk contains some bioactive substance that alters the metabolism in a way that helps to use and burn fat for the purpose of energizing the body. Of course, this "bioactive substance" could just be conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) - a fatty acid that has long been known as a fat burner.
As for the health concerns, few people realize that in addition to saturated fat - whose role in heart disease is now considered minimal to non-existent - whole milk also contains oleic acid, or oleic acid - the fatty acid that nutrition experts believe makes olive oil so valuable.
Of additional importance is the vitamin paradox represented by low-fat or fat-free milk. Milk contains fat-soluble vitamins such as vitamins A, D, E and K. However, when you remove the fat from a dairy product, you also remove most of the fat-soluble vitamins, which then need to be added back.
However, as long as you don't consume fat with your fat-free milk or haven't recently eaten some fat or plan to eat some fat soon after your glass of milk, many of the vitamins will be floating around in your digestive tract waiting in vain to be picked up and distributed throughout your body instead of experiencing the shame of being excreted and ending up in the toilet.
If you are a calorie counter, then you will probably continue to choose low-fat or fat-free milk. Others may want to give whole milk a chance.
8 - Of course you're fat, have an unpleasant body odor and suffer from acne! You've eaten some fructose!
The human body prefers glucose as its energy source. However, it will also readily accept fructose.
After consumption, fructose is transported to the liver (if you are not suffering from a real energy deficiency) and then to the liver mitochondria, which store the fructose either as glycogen for short-term use or as fat.
Although this process is reversible, it is not good for the health and function of the liver if it continues. Some scientists have even gone so far as to refer to fructose as "alcohol without the high".
Unfortunately, the fact that fructose can be stored as fat and potentially damage the liver has created a disproportionate fear of fructose - a condition I call "fructose delusion syndrome".
The science does not support these fears. John Sievenpiper, a nutritionist at St. Michaels Hospital in Toronto, Canada, looked at 41 human studies and noted that people who ate the same amount of calories, regardless of whether those calories were in the form of fructose or another carbohydrate source, gained the same amount of weight.
And you can also easily do an empirical observation and see that despite the mass avoidance of all things fructose, the rate of obesity has continued to increase.
But let's apply some logic to the situation. The most "effective" fructose blend - the high fructose corn syrup that many dread - has a fructose content of 55%, while the remaining 45% is glucose. Compare this to sucrose aka table sugar, which is a mixture of 50% fructose and 50% glucose.
This means that if you were to consume 100 grams of high fructose corn syrup per day, which is slightly more than the amount contained in three cans of cola, you would consume 5 grams more fructose than if you were to consume the same amount of sucrose.
This difference is not really worth mentioning...
9 - Don't eat turkey if you still have to drive!
Some people believe that turkey will make you sleepy because it contains the amino acid tryptophan, which is a precursor to the relaxation and feel-good hormone serotonin.
Yes, turkey contains tryptophan, but so do all other complete protein sources. That being said, tryptophan is a large, cumbersome amino acid that has a hard time squeezing its molecular framework through the narrow doors of the blood-brain barrier.
When tryptophan is consumed as part of a complete protein, some of the other smaller and more nimble amino acids reach the blood-brain barrier first, blocking tryptophan's ponderous attempts to cross it.
However, if you consume tryptophan on its own, it's a completely different story. Without competitors, tryptophan could manage to squeeze through the blood-brain barrier in larger quantities and do its serotonin thing. But the claim that turkey makes you sleepy is utter nonsense.
What makes you fall asleep at Thanksgiving or Christmas in the puddle of gravy on your plate is more likely the enormous 3000 kcal meal overloaded with fat and carbs you just ate.
10 - Normal salt will make your head explode!
I'm not going to talk about why the link between sodium consumption and high blood pressure is tenuous at best. Instead, I'm going to talk about something far more insidious that has something to do with what the "salt is bad" myth has done to most of us nutritionally speaking.
You are aware of the fact that the body needs iodine, right? The body uses iodine to make the thyroid hormones T3 and T4. If your diet doesn't contain enough iodine, you can develop nodules in your thyroid glands or even a monstrous goiter on your neck.
A milder deficiency can make it hard for you to stay slim or plague you with mysterious fatigue, depression, unexplained autoimmune disorders, a psychiatric disorder, fibrocystic breast disease or even cancer. Other less serious symptoms may include dry skin or constipation.
If you live by the sea, you probably get plenty of iodine (provided you eat locally grown food). However, the further away from the sea you live, the harder it will be for you to get enough iodine.
Fortunately, the clever people at the Morton Salt Company started adding iodine to their salt in 1924. This solved the problem of iodine deficiency in the US, as people in Kansas were now getting as much iodine from their diet as people in Massachusetts.
But then came the doctors. They started telling people to limit their salt intake or they would develop high blood pressure and promote heart failure. People listened to the doctors. As a result, they began to develop iodine deficiency.
But there are other factors that make it statistically likely that you are iodine deficient. Chemicals in drinking water such as chlorine and fluorine compete with iodine for the same receptors in the body. Then there are people who exercise a lot and lose a lot of valuable iodine through sweat.
What's left is a society where, according to some estimates, up to 74% of adults are iodine deficient.
What many need to start doing again is using iodized salt. Don't think you're off the hook just because you eat a lot of salt if you eat at restaurants or eat a lot of food from canned goods or Doritos. Restaurants or processed food manufacturers do not use iodized salt.
Likewise, sea salt and the gourmet pink salt from the Gobi Desert that your cosmetic and deodorant-avoiding naturalist friend uses contain meager amounts of iodine.
Get some old-fashioned iodized salt, leave the salt shaker on the dinner table and use it liberally (always assuming, of course, that you don't suffer from sodium-related hypertension).
From TC Luoma | 12/08/14
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/10-dumbest-diet-myths
Related blog posts:

Here's what you need to know...
- To follow the 5/2 diet, eat normally 5 days a week, while limiting your food intake to two 400 kcal meals on the other two days.
- Do not exercise on the low calorie days.
- Even if fat loss is not your main goal, this diet can improve insulin sensitivity and help you build muscle.
A diet without disadvantages
Fat loss diets are usually quite annoying - especially if you are training with the primary or at least secondary goal of looking really muscular and defined.
The diets are generally too strict, limit muscle gain too much, promote muscle loss, drive you crazy and make you want to hit the rest of the world over the head with a waffle iron. And these diets will not make you muscular and defined.
But the diet described here is not torture and will get you where you want to go in terms of body development.
While the origins of the diet I'm recommending are based on hard science and legitimate research studies, it was popularized in the fat loss world by magazines like Cosmo, Glamour and People. I've picked up on this approach and adapted it to fit the needs of strength athletes, bodybuilders and athletes.
The fat loss plan I modified is known as either "The Fast Diet" or the 5/2 Diet and two entrepreneurial authors named Dr. Michael Mosley and Mimi Spencer have written a book about it.
The diet is based on intermittent fasting, which is characterized by not eating for a period of time, but not continuously over an excruciatingly long period of time. Instead, you go without food for shorter, more tolerable (but still surprisingly effective) periods of time.
The short version
Eat what you normally eat 5 days a week. However, on 2 consecutive days, eat only 2 meals 12 hours apart, consuming only 800 kcal per day on those 2 days.
That is all. This type of diet will allow you to lose about a pound of fat per week while continuing to build muscle and strength. I believe this strategy will also set you up for unprecedented muscle gains as it will restore your insulin sensitivity.
Oh yeah, it will probably also dramatically improve your blood counts, protect your heart, ward off cancer and make you live longer, if you care about those things.
How can we make these claims?
Fasting in general is the oldest of all diet plans and probably dates back to the time when Antony told Cleopatra that she looked fat in her tunic. This makes sense, at least at first glance: when you drastically reduce calories, your body burns the fat to stay alive.
But fasting is problematic for a whole host of reasons. It's psychologically brutal and it can't be done in the long term. It can make you feel bad, it will give you bad breath, it will make your mere presence unpleasant for any sane person and - most significantly for strength athletes and athletes in general - it will preferentially break down muscle mass.
However, fasting also has its benefits. You will certainly lose some body fat. You may even feel clearer and more focused up to a point. And, most importantly, it improves insulin sensitivity.
If you eat all the time - or nearly all the time - then your insulin levels will always be elevated and as a result your body will always be in fat storage mode. Since your blood is a sugar-like substance, chemically more akin to Mountain Dew than healthy blood, your pancreas will be forced to secrete ever-increasing amounts of insulin.
As a result, fat storage will occur, but something worse will happen - the cells will stop responding to insulin and you will become a type 2 diabetic. Further fat storage will follow and you will have to keep your pants on.
I assume that many strength athletes are on the cusp of the type 2 diabetes cliff.
They eat continuously to ensure a steady and stable nutrient intake because they've been told by fat guys everywhere to eat this way (for muscle gains), which means their insulin levels will always be high and their insulin sensitivity will eventually plummet.
It's a bad practice that leads to poor body composition and poor overall health.
Fortunately, after just a few hours of fasting, insulin sensitivity begins to improve and your body switches from a fat-storing mode to a fat-burning mode, which is also the explanation for the effectiveness of intermittent fasting as a fat loss/health strategy.
Of mice and fat women
There are gigabytes of data on experimental animals and intermittent fasting. One such study, conducted at the Salk Institute, involved two groups of mice fed an isocaloric diet.
Both groups followed the same (high-fat) diet and were given the same amount of calories, but one group was allowed to eat whenever they wanted, while the other group had to eat all their food within 8 hours.
The latter group therefore fasted for 16 hours a day.
After 100 days, the intermittent fasting mice had put on 28% less fat and had lower cholesterol levels, lower blood sugar levels, less liver damage and lower levels of chronic inflammation. In the context of this experiment, intermittent fasting was therefore completely convincing.
Dr. Michelle Harvie and colleagues conducted another study with 107 female human volunteers.
In this study, the women were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group consisted of women who reduced their calorie intake by 25% 7 days per week, while the second group consisted of women who also reduced their calories by 25%, but only two days per week.
After 6 months, both groups had lost a comparable amount of fat and had comparable reductions in leptin, C-reactive protein, total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure. Surprisingly, the intermittent fasting group experienced a greater reduction in insulin resistance than the group that dieted 7 days a week.
Insulin strategy
The data suggests that intermittent fasting is a smart way to lose fat and has huge effects on body composition and blood values, but is it also a smart approach for strength athletes? I would say yes.
In the world of body composition, insulin sensitivity is everything. The more insulin sensitive your cells are, the better your results will be in building muscle and the easier it will be for you to be lean enough for everyone to see those muscles.
For this reason, intermittent fasting - and specifically the 5/2 version - should allow a strength athlete to get steadily leaner with each passing week without losing muscle mass.
This strategy could also, in theory, allow a bodybuilder to go through a mass-building phase while continuing to lose body fat, as the increased insulin sensitivity would allow them to build muscle more easily while losing fat.
I am also convinced that strength athletes can prepare their body for a subsequent mass-building phase by performing a relatively short 5/2 stint.
So if you as a strength athlete were to do 5/2 for two months before starting a bulking phase, you would build muscle mass faster thanks to the increased insulin sensitivity.
What does the plan look like again?
Eat normally 5 days a week. On two non-consecutive days, eat two meals of 400 kcal each 12 hours apart. These two days should be non-training days or cardio days so that you do not interfere with recovery and hypertrophy after training.
On your two fasting days, you should consume a portion of fast-digesting protein either as part of the 400 kcal meal or 30 minutes before each meal to ensure that there is no muscle breakdown during the fasting phase.
5/2 for strength athletes: Q & A
Have you followed this fat loss diet yourself?
Yes, and some of my friends have done it too. It works as described above.
Won't I be missing nutrients if I restrict myself to 800 kcal two days a week?
Stop looking at nutrition in 24 hour phases. It's almost impossible to get all your necessary vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals and micronutrients on non-fasting days - let alone fasting days.
Think in terms of weeks, not days. Do you think you've eaten well enough over the past week to meet all your nutritional needs? That is the way to good health.
In addition, the body stores most nutrients in case you don't eat them every day. Consider vitamin B12, one of the favorite vitamins of hucksters everywhere. Even though this vitamin is considered essential for health, most people have large stores in the liver that last five years.
Add this to the telling fact that you only need about 40 mg of vitamin B12 over the course of your lifetime, which is the equivalent of half a baby aspirin's worth of powder.
So you won't be missing out on any vital nutrients.
Will I suffer from hunger pangs on the fasting days?
Maybe, but live with it.
Will I have problems sleeping on the fasting days?
As answer to question 3, take a non-addictive, natural sleep aid.
Is it difficult to follow this diet?
The 5/2 diet plan is easy for most people to follow. Unlike most diet plans, it won't interfere with your social life too much. You may even become the hungrier, clearer-thinking animal you become on fast days because complacent animals don't get much done.
Can I continue to build muscle by following this plan?
- The 5/2 plan for strength athletes improves insulin sensitivity and in the world of growing muscle (and decreasing body fat), insulin is what matters.
Won't fasting days interfere with muscle growth and repair?
This is unlikely - especially if you are using a pulse-style protein intake during the diet. The most important times for muscle growth and repair are the first few hours after a training session. This is why nutrition around training is important.
However, this is also why you should not exercise on fasting days - only fast on non-training days or cardio days.
Why shouldn't I simply overcompensate and eat more than I consume on non-fasting days?
It's possible that you could eat more the day after a fasting day, but this doesn't seem to be an issue - neither with non-athletes who follow the original fasting diet, nor with the small group of strength athletes who have followed my version of this diet.
What types of meals should I eat on my fasting days?
You can eat normal muscle building meals, but they should be much smaller. For example, you could eat 125 grams of lean steak and a cup of broccoli, which would give you about 300 kcal.
Combine this with a protein pulse in the form of fast-digesting protein and you are in the region of 400 kcal, which is half of what you are allowed to eat on a fasting day. Certainly that's not a lot of food, but a generous consumption of coffee seems to help with hunger pangs.
How much fat can I expect to lose?
You should expect to lose one pound of fat per week, while perhaps gaining muscle mass a little faster due to increased insulin sensitivity.
Will this plan work for women?
Of course it will. However, women should also aim for a total calorie intake of 600 kcal per day instead of 800 kcal on their two non-consecutive fast days.
I should mention that the original diet as developed by Mosley and Spencer recommended that men eat 600 kcal on fast days instead of the 800 kcal recommended here, while women were recommended 500 kcal instead of 600 kcal.
I have manipulated the figures slightly as athletes and strength athletes have a higher calorie requirement than the average person.
How long should I follow the 5/2 fat loss diet for strength athletes?
You can follow this diet for as long as you want and you don't need to expect any diminishing results. Sure, you will eventually run out of flab to burn, but you should stay lean while benefiting from the muscle-building effects of greatly improved insulin sensitivity.
From TC Luoma | 09/24/13
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/5-2-fat-loss-diet-for-lifters

Here's what you need to know...
- Although it is biochemically possible for protein to be converted to fat if you consume large amounts of calories or extremely large amounts of protein, it is unlikely that you will ever find yourself in this situation.
- You can eat more or less as much protein as you want and it won't make you fat.
- The old myth that it is not possible to absorb more than 30 grams of protein during a meal is nonsense.
Aside from building muscle, protein provides essential amino acids that serve as building blocks for other proteins, enzymes and hormones in the body that are essential for normal body function. Without this continuous supply of amino acids, the body is forced to break down its own proteins - typically from muscle tissue - to meet its amino acid needs.
There are a lot of misconceptions about protein. It's not uncommon to hear claims that protein intake in excess of an arbitrarily chosen amount will result in storage as body fat. Even those who are supposed to be reliable sources of nutritional information propagate this unsupportable dogma. While flipping through a nutrition textbook, I stumbled across a section in the protein chapter regarding amino acids and energy metabolism (1). Here is the quote from that book:
"Consuming supplemental protein during periods of adequate glucose and energy intake generally contributes to higher fat storage rather than muscle growth. This is because during times of excess glucose and energy, your body directs the flow of amino acids away from gluconeogenesis and ATP-producing pathways and converts them into lipids instead. The resulting lipids can then be stored as body fat for later use."
This is more or less supported by another textbook I own (2):
"During periods of excess energy and protein intake combined with adequate carbohydrate intake, the carbon skeleton of amino acids can be used to synthesize fatty acids."
Even if these passages take into account the metabolic state of the person, I still don't think this explanation is complete. In fact, more up-to-date studies are needed when it comes to the conversion of amino acids into fatty acids. While the metabolic pathways for converting amino acids to fatty acids do indeed exist in the human body, the fact is that under most circumstances this conversion will not occur.
Protein digestion begins in the stomach and ends in the small intestine
Even though the physical "breakdown" of protein takes place in the mouth, it takes until the stomach for any significant chemical breakdown to occur. This breakdown is promoted by hydrochloric acid and the enzyme pepsin (which is formed from its inactive form pepsinogen). After the initial protein denaturation and protein cleavage is complete, the polypeptides pass through the gastric pyloric muscle and enter the duodenum.
The duodenum is where most of the protein digestion and virtually all of the absorption of amino acids takes place (about 90% of amino acids are absorbed, while a small amount is excreted in the stool. Here, even more digestive enzymes are present to break down the remaining polypeptides into their individual amino acids along with traces of di- and tripeptides. Once fully broken down, the free amino acids and the di- and tripeptides can enter the cells of the small intestine, where some of these (such as glutamine) are used as an energy source within the cells of the intestine, while the remaining amino acids enter the bloodstream and are transported to the liver.
Claims regarding protein absorption
Before we move on to the liver and discuss amino acid metabolism in relation to the initial claims, I would first like to address another related claim that you may have heard about in the media or through your local gym. This claim usually goes along the following lines:
"The average person can only absorb 30 grams of protein per meal, anything above this is stored as fat."
Unlike the previous claims, there is no context for this one. In fact, it is completely idiotic. While this claim may sound like a straw man argument, it actually comes from an online article written by a registered dietitian.
Take, for example, a person who consumes 40 grams of protein during a meal. If we were to assume that only 30 grams of protein can be absorbed at a time, then it is safe to say that the extra 10 grams would be excreted in the stool. If this were the case, then most people would be excreting small steaks on a daily basis. Going back to the original assertion, there is also the question of how we can store 10 grams of excess protein as body fat if we can't absorb it in the first place. While I agree that most processes in the human body do not operate at 100% efficiency, excreting 25% of the protein consumed is a far cry from the 90% efficiency supported by the literature (3).
Theoretically, it could be possible that the absorption of amino acids in the gut is drastically impaired, which would result in excess amino acids passing through the gut. In reality, this process is extremely limited. A serious absorption disorder would require the absorption capacity of the small intestine to be greatly exceeded.
With large amounts of protein- and calorie-rich food, the stomach simply reduces the rate at which it empties in order to supply the intestine more slowly with the amino acids supplied (which means that larger meals take longer to digest). In addition, the gut itself will slow down motility (rate of movement of food mash in the gut) to increase the time nutrients are available for absorption (4).
The bottom line is that the stomach will allow sufficient time for the amino acids to be released into the intestine, where they can be further retained and subsequently absorbed into the body/bloodstream. Without this finely tuned process, we would have died out as a species a long time ago. Consuming precisely planned meals with 30 grams of protein several times a day in order to efficiently isolate the nutrients from our food would simply have been too much to ask in our evolutionary past.
The liver, the primary site of amino acid metabolism
Let's go back to the initial claims that excess protein during periods of adequate energy and carbohydrate intake is converted into fatty acids and stored as body fat.
The amino acids that are absorbed and released from the small intestine are transported to the liver. More than half of all amino acids supplied in the form of protein are absorbed by the liver. The liver acts as a kind of controller for absorbed amino acids and adjusts their metabolism (breakdown, synthesis, catabolism, anabolism, etc.) based on the metabolic state of the body and the body's needs (2).
This is where the initial assertion comes into play. Even though the pathways for fatty acid synthesis from amino acids exist - there is no room for debate here - the statement that all excess protein is stored as fat under the specified circumstances ignores current research findings.
Welcome to one of the most rigorously controlled studies of our time
In 2012, George Bray and colleagues set out to investigate whether dietary protein levels affected body composition, weight gain and/or energy expenditure in subjects following one of three hypercaloric diets (i.e. consuming more calories than they expended): low protein (5% protein), normal protein intake (15%) or high protein (25%).
After the subjects had been randomly assigned to one of the three groups, they were placed in a metabolic ward and had to consume 140% of their maintenance calorie intake (+ 1000 kcal per day) every day for a period of 8 weeks. Protein intake averaged 47 grams (0.68 g/kg) in the low-protein group, 140 grams (1.79 g/kg) in the normal-protein group and 230 grams (3.0 g/kg) in the high-protein group.
Carbohydrate intake was the same in all groups (41 to 42%), while fat intake ranged from 33% in the high-protein group to 44% in the normal-protein group and 52% in the low-protein group. Over the course of the 8 weeks, the subjects' body composition was measured every 2 weeks using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA, the "gold standard" for body composition measurements).
Results
At the end of the study, all subjects from all groups showed almost identical gains in body fat. (Strictly speaking, the group on the high-protein diet had gained slightly less body fat than the group on the low-protein diet. However, this difference was not statistically relevant). The low-protein group gained the least amount of weight (3.16 kilograms), while the subjects in the normal and high-protein groups gained about twice as much weight (6.05 and 6.51 kilograms).
As you can see above, the extra 3 kilos gained by the subjects in the two higher protein groups (15% and 25%) was lean body mass and not body fat. The conclusion of the authors of the study was as follows:
"Calories alone contributed to the increase in body fat. In contrast, protein contributed to changes in lean body mass but not to body fat gain.
Although we can't say for sure what the exact composition of lean body mass built up was, we can say with a fair degree of certainty that the extra protein was not primarily used for fat storage. My sense is that the protein was converted to glucose (via gluconeogenesis) and subsequently stored as glycogen in conjunction with some water weight. Either way, it wasn't body fat.
Let's rethink our ideas
Let's let this sink in for a second. The subjects were literally forced to eat about 1000 kcal more than they needed to maintain their body weight over 8 full weeks, and even then, protein was observed to contribute to an increase in lean body mass rather than body fat.
Considering the initial claim - that once energy, glucose and protein needs are met, all excess amino acids are converted to fatty acids and stored as body fat - it is clear that members of the higher protein intake groups did not succumb to any of these silly predictions. In reality, they gained very little (if any) additional body fat compared to the low protein intake group. This is in stark contrast to what is commonly believed.
In the end, however, the essential question underlying the whole concept still remains: what is the maximum amount of protein (amino acids) that the body can effectively use before it starts converting amino acids into fatty acids and storing them as body fat?
Considering the results of this study, it appears that this number is either significantly higher than three times the officially recommended daily protein intake with an accompanying hypercaloric diet for weeks in a row, or that it requires a similar protocol of excessive caloric intake over an extended period of time before the gains in lean body mass reach a plateau and fat mass increases more.
Either way, both situations are highly unlikely for the general public and even those who are consciously trying to gain weight through higher protein and calorie intake. Furthermore, this upper extreme is likely to be highly individualized and dependent on other factors such as genetics, lifestyle, training status, etc. Unfortunately, we don't have the answers to these questions yet.
Final thoughts
So even if we have the biochemical processes required to convert amino acids to fatty acids, the likelihood of this ever happening to any significant degree - even in the face of adequate energy and carbohydrate intake - with a slightly increased protein intake is minimal, given what we know about the extreme measures required for protein to lead to a significant increase in fat.
In fact, a caloric surplus of 1000 kcal per day for 8 weeks combined with a higher protein intake compared to a hypercaloric diet with less protein did not lead to additional gains in body fat. Instead, excess protein in the face of excess calorie intake contributed to gains in lean body mass. This is the opposite of what textbooks and gurus preach.
In reality, the likelihood of excess protein contributing to body fat storage is insignificantly low and undoubtedly virtually impossible under normal or slightly hypercaloric circumstances, as can be observed in most athletes. Only when theoretical extremes - either for protein intake or calorie intake or both - are reached will excessive protein intake contribute significantly to body fat gain.
References
- McGuire M, Beerman, KA.: Nutritional Sciences: From Fundamentals to Food. 2nd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2011.
- Gropper S, Smith, JL, Groff, JL: Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism. 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2009.
- Ten Have GA, Engelen MP, Luiking YC, Deutz NE: Absorption kinetics of amino acids, peptides, and intact proteins. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2007, 17 Suppl:S23-36.
- Maljaars PW, Peters HP, Mela DJ, Masclee AA: Ileal brake: a sensitive food target for appetite control. A review. Physiol Behav 2008, 95:271-281.
- Bray GA, Smith SR, de Jonge L, Xie H, Rood J, Martin CK, Most M, Brock C, Mancuso S, Redman LM: Effect of dietary protein content on weight gain, energy expenditure, and body composition during overeating: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012, 307:47-55.
by Dylan Klein | 09/24/13
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/protein-will-not-make-you-fat
Related blog posts:

"If it doesn't swim, run or fly, or is green and grows on the ground, don't eat it."
Many readers will be familiar with this definition of the Paleo diet. You may also be familiar with Jack Lalanne's simple description, "If it's made by humans, don't eat it. These definitions summarize the practical application of the "traditional" caveman diet quite well.
My nutritional approach has been quite accurately described as a "Paleo meets sports nutrition" hybrid, but let's start with the Paleo side of this diet first. The practical application strategy above is simple, but it's a useful endeavor to dive a little deeper into this form of nutrition and learn some of the details about why the "eat what your ancestors ate" philosophy can be so effective.
Otherwise, after a day of exposure to internet health ads and endless amounts of misinformation, you might well come back and ask "but wait, aren't fruit juices, wheat bread, low-fat mayonnaise and fiber-enriched breakfast cereals good for us?"
No, they're not, unless you're Tony the Tiger and sponsored by Kellogs.
Paleo in a nutshell
Diets based on animal products are superior to plant-based diets
Animal protein is considered to be of higher quality than grain or vegetable protein because it contains all the essential amino acids, it contains them in greater quantities in combination with essential fatty acids, and it contains them in the correct proportions and ratios that Mother Nature intended for us. The last is the key point.
Essential fatty acids and essential amino acids are named for a reason. If we weren't designed to eat animal protein, then our bodies wouldn't need these essential nutrients for normal metabolic and endocrine function. Rather, they would be optional and we would have a need for essential cellulose and soy paste.
Take a look at what is contained in just 120 grams of sockeye salmon
- 24 g protein including all amino acids
- 2 g saturated fat
- 5 g monounsaturated fats
- 1500 mg omega-3 fatty acids
- 425 mg omega-6 fatty acids
Nature is and remains simply unbeatable.
A diet rich in vegetables is healthy, but that doesn't make a vegetarian diet the healthiest diet. While vegetarians try to get the essential nutrients they could get from animal foods through all the food combining, they can still end up with a diet that is a metabolic disaster: inadequate protein intake, incomplete amino acid profile, an imbalance of essential fatty acids, too much sugar and refined flour, too many carbohydrates combined with too much dietary fat, too many phytoestrogen compounds from soy products... and I could go on and on.
And if vegetarianism is so damn great, why is such a large percentage of vegetarians overweight and/or unhealthy looking?
Surely most readers won't be pining to follow a vegetarian diet, but now that you have a logical argument for those crazy relatives and friends who religiously swear that vegetarian-based diets are the healthiest dietary approach on the planet and that eating meat will kill you.
Eliminate sugar/concentrated fructose sources from your diet
If I had my choice, I would give fructose the world championship belt as the worst compound in the modern diet. If you did nothing but eliminate sugar and high fructose corn syrup from your diet, you'd probably end up with a decent body composition. But this junk is everywhere and in everything.
According to numerous studies, fructose is the main culprit in table sugar that is responsible for the development of insulin resistance - yes, fructose and not the poor glucose or starch compounds that are unfairly lumped into the same category by the "all carbs are evil" campaign.
An article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition took a closer look at fructose metabolism. The report indicated that fructose is preferentially metabolized to fat in the liver compared to glucose. In animal models, fructose produced the following reactions: Insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, high insulin levels, high triglyceride levels and hypertension.
Eliminate trans fats
If fructose is the "champion of the worst modern foods", then trans fats are the undisputed number one challenger. These compounds are essential vegetable oils that have had a hydrogen atom added to their structure through a process called hydrogenation. This makes these oils firmer in structure and extends their shelf life - both great things if you're a manufacturer of processed snacks.
However, this chemical change is also what makes trans fats so problematic if you're a health enthusiast. Because trans fats are basically unnatural, mutated fats, they raise total cholesterol levels and levels of bad LDL cholesterol, increase levels of C-reactive proteins, lower levels of good HDL cholesterol, and therefore are a primary risk factor for coronary artery disease.
And for the "I just want to get hard and defined" group? Well, trans fats have been shown to inhibit glucose breakdown, promote insulin resistance and induce abdominal obesity (1).
So if you see trans fats or hydrogenated vegetable oils, you should do what Iron Maiden sings, "Run to the hills, run for your lives."
Improve your omega-6: omega-3 ratio
The optimal omega-6 to omega-3 ratio for good health is between 1:1 and 4:1. This is the ratio that probably existed before modern food processing, when the majority of dietary fats came from wild animal meat and fish.
With the addition of highly processed vegetable oils as one of the cornerstones of the diet, the average American's dietary profile has reached a ratio of 10-15:1, with values as high as 40:1. This unnaturally high ratio can lead to body-wide inflammation, exacerbate autoimmune diseases and increase the risk of heart disease and certain cancers.
At the same time that the amount of vegetable oils and processed foods has increased, the average omega-3 intake has decreased. Meat from wild animals and fish are naturally rich in omega-3 fatty acids, but these foods have been replaced in most people's diets by domesticated, corn- and grain-fed versions that are richer in omega-6 fatty acids.
Omega-3 fatty acids have anti-inflammatory properties, improve insulin sensitivity, reduce triglyceride levels in the blood, dilate blood vessels and reduce overall risk factors for disease.
I realize this needs some credence, but it's not the natural saturated or monounsaturated fats in animal flesh that are killing us, it's the abnormally high amounts of omega-6 fatty acids from vegetable oils (including the trans-fat varieties).
Think about it - natural fats that our species grew up with vs. modern fats that we process. I'm in Vegas, I'm putting money on the natural fats - despite the poor odds influenced by the dominant, yet archaic, so-called health authorities.
The problem is that medical advice and the modern diet curriculum is heavily influenced by the food industry. That's why you usually hear that saturated fats from animals are bad and polyunsaturated fats from vegetable oils are good. It's a joke, but a joke at our expense. Eat animals and non-processed oils.
Eliminate gluten-containing foods, grains and legumes
Most of the problems associated with grains have nothing to do with the starch content of the grain. Glucose is one of our oldest evolutionary sources of energy. Unless you've made yourself insulin resistant by being fat, eating too much fructose, consuming too many omega-6 fatty acids, not eating enough omega-3 fatty acids, or not doing consistent strength training, your body can do just fine with glucose polymers from starch. In a properly functioning, active and athletic body, your body stores normal amounts of glucose as muscle glycogen.
The main problem with modern cereal products are the compounds that are included in addition to the starch itself. Gluten, for example, is not a carbohydrate but a protein found in grains such as wheat, barley and rye and is a highly problematic food for many people.
We don't all suffer from a full-blown gluten allergy, also known as coeliac disease - a debilitating condition linked to the consumption of wheat/gluten in which the immune system attacks and destroys cells of the gut - but many of us may suffer from gluten sensitivity. A new study even questions whether eating wheat is safe for anyone (2).
Unfortunately, the term "gluten-free" has become a marketing tool with pharisaical, holistic crowds, but eliminating gluten from the diet can be a beneficial step for overall digestive health, physical performance (reduced symptoms of lethargy) and physical appearance (reduced abdominal bloating).
My recommendation is to give up gluten for a few weeks and see how you respond. Something like this could work wonders for you, or it could do nothing at all - but you won't know until you try it.
Other detrimental compounds in modern grains are what are collectively referred to as "anti-nutrients" in the Paleo diet.
Phytic acid is the storage form of phosphorus in plants and this is typically found in the bran and seeds. Humans cannot digest phytic acid as they lack the necessary digestive enzyme called phytase.
Strike one against phytic acid is that it can cause digestive abnormalities. Strike two is that it acts as a chelator of minerals, which interferes with proper absorption of these minerals such as zinc and iron. Strike three is that the foods that contain phytic acid generally taste like cardboard and also have a similar texture. Loren Cordain once said that cereal grains are better left to the birds.
Legumes and grains also contain a compound called lectin. Lectins are sugar-binding molecules that plants have evolved to repel insects - I would say this is a good indication that these compounds are not meant to be consumed in large quantities by humans.
What are the problems associated with lectins? How about irritation and damage to the intestines, excessive secretion of mucus into the gut, reduced absorption of nutrients, diarrhea, nausea and bloating (3)?
However, you may recall that rice - technically a grain - is a foundation of my dietary recommendations. This is because rice is naturally gluten-free and phytic acid and lectin are removed in the rice mill and during cooking. What's left is a mixture of amylopectin and amylose starches - compounds your body can cope with if you don't suffer from insulin resistance.
Reduce dairy products during a diet/restriction phase
Arnold once said, "Dairy is for babies."
To be honest, dairy is such a controversial topic (among nutritionists, trainers, athletes, bodybuilders, and body development enthusiasts) and there are so many different issues to discuss (acid-base balance, insulin index, isolated milk proteins vs. dairy, wasting during bulking phases vs. avoiding during dieting phases, etc.) that this topic deserves its own article. But I don't want to leave you hanging.
I'm a fat loss guy and so are 99% of my clients over the last 10 years. Mass gain may be a different story, but my short answer is that full-fat dairy products (milk, cheese, cream, yogurt, etc.) should be eliminated from your diet during a diet and definition phase.
Paleo in practice
- Take a grass-fed cow, cut off its head and eat it - and don't feel bad about it either. That's what we're supposed to do. Our mouths have incisors for evolutionary reasons and their job is to bite meat off the bone, not marshmallows off cereal in Lucky Charms Cornflakes. Nature is brutal - and we are wild creatures. The further we move away from this and eat processed foods to compensate, the sicker and fatter we will become.
- Eliminate almost all processed foods from your diet. Most processed foods are nothing more than a random combination of the following six ingredients, none of which are good for you:
- Sugar (and/or high fructose corn syrup)
- Trans fats/hyped oils
- Omega-6 rich vegetable oil
- Wheat or flour-based starch
- Purified salt
- Artificial ingredients/sweeteners
- Make low-fat animal protein the basis of your diet. A range for strength athletes is from 2 to 4.5 grams of protein per kilogram of lean body mass, depending on the rest of your diet.
- Eliminate concentrated sources of fructose from your diet. Avoid high fructose corn syrup and processed foods with fructose as a sweetener, sugar (which consists of one molecule of fructose and one molecule of glucose), fruit juices/smoothies and dried fruit. Personally, I'm not a big fan of fruit, but 1 to 2 pieces of unprocessed fruit a day shouldn't be a problem. Just don't start inhaling bananas by the dozen. At a certain point, the fructose adds up.
- Eliminate trans fats and hydrogenated oils from your diet.
- Reduce your consumption of omega-6 fatty acids by eliminating vegetable oils from your diet.
- Increase omega-3 consumption by eating wild fish, grass-fed beef and fish oil capsules.
- Eliminate gluten-containing grains such as wheat, rye and barley from your diet.
- While we're at it - eliminate most other grains from your diet too, including those darn overrated whole grains (breads and cereals).
- Eliminate dairy products (milk, cream, cheese, yogurt) from your diet during a diet and definition phase. Isolated milk proteins are fine.
Don't call me the "Paleo guy"!
As you can see, I believe there are many great principles that a strength athlete, bodybuilder or figure athlete can take from a Paleo style diet, but I don't want to give you the false impression that I am a true "Paleo guy". I definitely recommend applying certain Paleo principles, but my overall recommendations are drastically different.
Starch sources like rice and potatoes are certainly not Paleo foods, but along with low-fat protein, they are the foundation of my plan for athletes as an anabolic energy source and for generating an anabolic state.
You'll never convince me that a 130-pound, obese, insulin-resistant, sedentary office worker who just wants to be able to see his penis in its original form again should eat the same diet as an 85-pound, defined, insulin-sensitive, athletic alpha male who is trying to reach his peak athletic performance or optimal body development and can't keep his penis in his pants for more than 5 minutes.
And yet you believe this if you believe in dogmatic adherence to a "one size fits all" system. That may be fine for programs aimed at the commercial masses, but seasoned strength athletes are better informed and smarter.
To me, the true value of a Paleo diet for an anaerobic athlete lies more in what it removes from the average person's plan and less in the overall structure or macronutrient ratios of the plan itself. Why? Because a 100 percent Paleo diet doesn't take into account differences in activity levels, individual metabolic factors, and differences between average and extreme goals for body development and performance.
Physician and nutrition researcher Kurt G. Harris refers to certain modern food compounds as Neolithic agents for disease, which I believe is a very accurate description. As previously mentioned, modern foods such as concentrated sugar/concentrated fructose, high omega-6 oils, trans fats and gluten have devastating effects on our body systems, body composition and risk factors for disease. Eliminating these compounds from the diet is a worthwhile step toward better health for everyone - whether they are overweight, lean, physically inactive, athletes, office workers, iron warriors, nuns, porn stars, or people somewhere in between.
But, to quote Kurt G. Harris again, glucose is a necessary internal energy source and metabolic product, as well as a food and a building block of foods that have the longest evolutionary history of any food consumed by mammals.
(Are you confused now? Stay with me. Remember you're in good hands - I'm half Japanese, which is why I'm all about efficiency).
Glucose is one of the oldest evolutionary sources of energy and a healthy body knows how to process and use glucose and an active athlete should be treated differently to a sick diabetic.
Due to a lack of nutritional and physiological knowledge and a tendency to always go to extremes, categorize and demonize cultural trends (think back to the low-fat era, during which healthy fish oils, essential fatty acids and natural monounsaturated fats were lumped into the same category as trans fats and hydrogenated oils) and simple ignorance, several valuable body development and performance enhancing foods - starchy carbohydrates that don't contain fructose or gluten - were washed away with the Paleo maelstrom.
I don't recommend a Paleo-only diet any more than I recommend a diet consisting purely of sports foods - I recommend a well-researched and well-informed mix.
I want you to understand why I think glucose polymers can be beneficial while concentrated sources of fructose can be disastrous, why saturated fats from natural animal sources can be better than polyunsaturated fats from processed plant sources, and why pure amylopectin starches can be less problematic than starches that contain gluten or lectins and why.
Typical transformations of fat guys
Let's examine a typical scenario and why all carbohydrates have been lumped into one category and demonized.
A fat guy follows a typical American diet - 50% sugar, tons of trans fats, omega-6 fatty acids and gluten. When he eats healthy, it's usually a white bread sandwich with low-fat mayonnaise and cheese. Our fat guy is tired of being fat and sick and feeling crappy all the time and is finally motivated enough to make some changes. Somehow he stumbles across paleo/caveman diet recommendations.
He puts the plan into action, loses a ton of weight, gets healthier, etc - all in all, he does a good job. Amazing. But now he has an almost religious affection for this "system". He can't see anything else outside of this system - not even scientifically studied and anecdotally proven principles. All carbohydrates, regardless of their source, are the enemy. Pure glucose polymers from rice and potatoes are no different from sugar or gluten-containing wheat. Finally, he lost a ton of weight on the low-carb/paleo diet.
What our fat guy doesn't realize is that commercialized diet plans and "systems" fail to address the subtleties of why dietary recommendations for fat, physically inactive people should be different from dietary recommendations for active athletes for the following reasons:
- Programs that are intended to be a commercial success must present a plan that is the same for everyone. These "works for everyone, everywhere" systems dramatically expand the potential market.
- The average reader will not or cannot understand the detailed science necessary to individualize plans.
- Many guinea pigs and authors don't know or don't care what goes on in the real training world.
But deep down, our fat guy still knows he's not exactly where he wants to be. He's a lot better off than he used to be, but he's still soft, he still lacks shape and definition, and he may still have that layer of belly fat. He knows he wants to make progress, but he's stuck in a system - a system that could very well be hindering his progress.
Regardless of this, he is now in a completely different place. He's no longer a fat guy, he's an active athletic guy and targeted sports nutrition principles could be relevant and beneficial to him now. Losing weight and consistent strength training has dramatically improved his insulin sensitivity. A few carbs could help him build muscle, get leaner, boost metabolism, increase thyroid hormone release/leptin levels, improve free testosterone to cortisol ratio, improve his body and even lose fat.
But he still has the psychology of a fat guy. He's afraid of fat - he suffers from this "I don't want to go back to being a fat guy by eating carbs" fear.
Hey I know this from personal experience. While researching this stuff, I followed these plans myself. I've followed the typical American diet, the strict Paleo diet, my current dietary recommendations and everything in between. I've also lived the practical side of this and the most important lesson is this: You can't get caught up in a formalized, "one system fits all" system if you expect to find what works best for you, your current athletic state, and your current goals.
References
- Kavanagh et al, Trans fat diet induces abdominal obesity and changes in insulin sensitivity in monkeys. Obesity 2007 Jul;15(7):1675-84.
- Bernardo D et al, Is gliadin really safe for non-coeliac individuals? Production of interleukin 15 in biopsy culture from non-coeliac individuals challenged with gliadin peptides. Gut 56 (6): 889-90.
- Miyake K et al, Lectin-Based Food Poisoning: A New Mechanism of Protein Toxicity. PLoS ONE 2 (1): e687.
By Nate Miyaki | 03/25/11
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/paleo-nutrition-improved