Nutrition

A question of nutrition - calories
thumb

Mass building nutrition

Q: Most weight training coaches agree that you need extra calories to build muscle. But the question is, how many extra calories? On one side you have those who say you should eat a few hundred calories more than your maintenance calories and on the other side you have those who say you should eat a ton of food and train hard. What do you think is best for a man who wants to build muscle?

Dr. Bowden: "Train hard and eat a ton of food" sounds like a great philosophy.... if you're working towards becoming a sumo wrestler.

I think the "eat a ton of food and train hard" approach is kind of like practicing clay pigeon shooting with a blindfold on. You might hit the target, but you might also hit one of the other shooters. I think it's much smarter to start with a controlled amount of extra calories and see if that amount is enough to hit the target. Ask yourself what your performance looks like, what your energy levels look like and whether you like the results in the mirror. If you are not happy with the results, keep adjusting the calories until you are satisfied.

If you're a bodybuilder, you're going to be training hard anyway, so it's just a matter of how much you should eat to ensure that most of the extra calories are used to build muscle rather than fat. "Eat a ton of food" is way too unscientific for most bodybuilders today.

How healthy is fasting?

Q: What do you think about intermittent fasting? I've read about plans that involve periodic 24-hour fasts. Other plans involve fasting on alternate days. It is claimed that this type of fasting can improve insulin sensitivity and prolong life expectancy, among other things. What are your thoughts on this topic?

Dr. Bowden: The idea of fasting as a strategy to improve health has been around since the days of Hippocrates - the man who is considered the father of modern medicine. Fasting is used in the religious realm as a spiritual discipline and many spa clinics use some form of fasting - often referred to as a detoxification program - as part of their treatment program.

"Fasting and detoxification are the missing pieces of the Western diet," says my friend Dr. Elson Haas, author of "The New Detox Diet." Haas has been using detox programs as part of his medical treatments for over 30 years. "Fasting is by far the best natural healing therapy I know of," he told me. "People need a break from what they eat every day. Fasting can give the body a break during which it can restore its balance." But true fasting - even for just one day - can be really hard on the body. "A more widespread and looser definition of fasting includes juices from fresh fruits and vegetables, as well as herbal teas," Haas says. "Fresh juices are easily absorbed by the body and require minimal digestion, while still providing lots of nutrients. They can encourage the body to eliminate waste products. Juice fasting is healthier than water fasting because it supports the body nutritionally while cleansing the body and maintaining your energy levels."

You've probably heard about all this fasting on alternate days because of some experiments done on mice at the University of California at Berkeley. The scientists starved the poor mice on alternate days and allowed them to eat whatever they wanted on the days in between. "We found that fasting can reduce the proliferation rate of cells in the skin and breast area," lead researcher Krista Varady told me. "This resulted in a reduced risk of breast and skin cancer."

I won't bore you with the details of the research, but just mention that the scientists also found that you don't have to completely abstain from all food intake on fasting days. You can maintain 25 percent of your normal food intake on these days - which is roughly equivalent to one meal - and still reap the benefits.

But don't use fasting as a weight loss strategy. It never works. Even in the mouse experiments, the animals overcompensated for their fasting days by eating more on the non-fasting days and ended up consuming the same amount of calories as they would on a normal diet.

Since the only life-extension strategy that has ever worked in the lab is calorie restriction, and some theorists suggest that downregulation of insulin signaling may be part of the reason for this, consuming fewer calories in the context of a nutrient-dense diet makes sense. So occasionally taking a day off from your regular diet and giving your digestive system a break is not a bad idea.

Food allergies and the elimination diet

Q: Is it true that if you eat a certain food all the time, you can develop an allergy to that food?

Dr. Bowden: It is true that both allergies and hypersensitivity (which is much more common) can develop later in life and this can be the case even with foods that you have been able to eat for a long time without obvious reactions. This problem seems to be more prevalent with foods that contain ingredients (such as wheat) that are found everywhere and that we consume in far greater quantities than ever before in the history of the human diet. A very good way to find out if your body is reacting to a particular food, or to identify a possible "suspect", is to use a so-called elimination diet, which I have described in more detail in my book "The Most Effective Natural Cures on Earth".

Such an elimination diet is simple detective work. You simply eliminate a potentially intolerable food from your diet for a few weeks. If certain symptoms such as headaches, concentration problems or tiredness disappear as a result, then you have identified the culprit. It is often possible to reintroduce this food into your diet periodically, e.g. once every four days, without any problems.

An alternative sweetener?

Q: I recently read that xylitol powder can be used as a sweetener. What is xylitol and do you recommend it?

Dr. Bowden: Xylitol is often referred to as birch sugar and is made from birch bark. It is my favorite sweetener that has quite a specific taste. Xylitol has no real drawbacks - except that it can be lethal to pets. It tastes like sugar, but has 40 percent fewer calories. Xylitol can be used in hot drinks such as coffee and has virtually no glycemic impact. It also has the added benefit of preventing certain bacteria from sticking to body tissues, making it the perfect sweetener for healthy chewing gum. You can also use xylitol in baking, using the same amount as sugar. This makes xylitol the perfect sugar substitute for diabetics and as part of a low-carb diet.

Is my microwave trying to kill me?

Q: Is a microwave really dangerous or is this just another conspiracy theory?

Dr. Bowden: I'm torn on this question. The general consensus is that microwaves are perfectly safe, but they say the same thing about cell phones...and I don't think the last word has been said on the subject. Among natural food advocates, it is considered a kind of given fact that microwaving changes the "energetic" nature of food, but this is very difficult to prove and easy to dismiss as the gobbledygook of the aluminum hat faction. There was a lawsuit in 1991 in the case of a hip surgery patient who died after a simple blood transfusion after a nurse heated the blood in a microwave. (Blood is normally warmed before a transfusion, but not in a microwave). This has given new impetus to the argument that more happens during microwave heating than we previously believed. But who really knows? It's hard to get really good information on this topic - much like cell phone radiation. Most of the arguments come from obscure European studies that are almost impossible to find, but still, the whole thing is a little scary. I'm of the opinion that microwaved food tastes pretty awful. If heat from any source was the same, then a microwaved potato should taste the same as a baked potato, but it doesn't - and this supports the suggestion that there's more going on here than we realize. You can try this out for yourself by microwaving a sweet potato. Horrible.

Personally, I rarely use a microwave for cooking.

Fish oil for depression

Q: Does fish oil really help with depression? I don't suffer from clinical depression, but who couldn't benefit from a mood booster?

Dr. Bowden: There is some ongoing research by Dr. Andrew Stoll at Harvard University regarding the use of fish oil for depression in people who suffer from bipolar disorder. These studies are using really high doses - 10 grams - but even lower doses are showing an effect, which is especially true when combined with nutrients like folic acid and a low-sugar diet. That's good for a lot of things, but also for depression? It would seem so. While it's not proof, it is a fact that almost every behavioral or cognitive disorder that has been studied has been found to have really low levels of omega-3 fatty acids in the bloodstream.

As omega-3 fatty acids are incorporated into cell membranes, making them more porous and flexible, it could make it easier for neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine, which have mood-enhancing effects, to enter the cells, which would be reflected in a better mood.

Alli to support fat loss

Q: My wife insists on trying this Alli weight loss drug now that it is available over the counter. This seems like pretty garbage to me. What's really going on with Alli?

Dr. Bowden: Well, no one has ever called me a marriage counselor and certainly not someone who is always politically correct, so I'll be blunt and direct: You're right and your wife is wrong. Alli is total garbage. But it's a lesson for us. Salespeople - including salespeople in the drug manufacturing business - love to throw percentages around because they can be accurate and dishonest at the same time.

For example, let's say there's a 1 in 10 million chance of winning the lottery and I have a system that I can guarantee to increase your chances of winning the lottery by 100%. However, this only increases your chances of winning from 1 in 10 million to 2 in 10 million! Think about this the next time you read about how people who took a certain weight loss drug "lost 43 percent more weight." Or that someone who took a certain bodybuilding supplement "built 37 percent more muscle. This can be accurate but still bullshit. Often this means that the control group lost one pound of weight per month, while the group that used the drug lost 1.43 pounds per month.

Alli is nothing more than an over-the-counter, weaker version of the long-standing drug Xenical (the generic name of the active ingredient is orlistat). It already didn't work very well as full strength Xenical. I'm not sure why changing the name and reducing the dosage would solve this problem, but what do I know.... Alli is a member of the group of weight loss drugs called digestive inhibitors. It prevents some of the fat you eat from being digested and absorbed by your body. It does this by inhibiting the digestive enzyme lipase, which breaks down fat.

The result? About 30 percent of the fat you eat doesn't end up on your hips. A side effect of this drug is euphemistically called "anal leakage" and describes what happens to the fat you don't digest. Any more questions? How about this one: "What happens to the fat that's already on your hips?" The answer is: nothing.

The first major study to publicize Xenical was a two-year European study that showed that patients using Xenical lost between two and three percent more weight than members of the placebo group. A second two-year study put overweight patients on a calorie-restricted diet and gave them 120 mg of Xenical three times a day. At the end of the year, these patients had lost 9 pounds more than the control group. Look closely at these figures. Nine pounds within a year - that's three quarters of a pound per month. A similar study from the US produced a weight loss of 1.5 pounds per month in Xenical users.

People lose weight when they use Xenical or Alli because these drugs basically reduce calorie intake automatically. For example, if you consume 2,500 kcal per day and 30 percent of those calories are fat, then you would normally consume 750 kcal in the form of fat. By taking Xenical, a third of these fat calories are not absorbed, so that 750 kcal theoretically become 500 kcal. So you save 250 kcal while eating the same meals (note the word "theoretically"). Stick with this plan for a week and you will have saved 250 kcal times seven or 1,750 kcal or about half a pound of fat.

Of course, you could easily cut unhealthy calories and unhealthy simple carbs and give up Alli, but that idea is not supported by a 150 million dollar marketing budget.

So is Alli the answer? Probably not, unless you own shares in Glaxo.

Is brown rice healthy?

Q: I don't do well with carbohydrates, which is why I strictly control the carbohydrates in my diet. However, I have been thinking about adding brown rice to my diet. What's the real story behind brown rice: is it good for me or is it overrated?

Dr. Bowden: Brown rice is not the worst thing, but it is overrated. The glycemic index and glycemic load of brown and white rice are very similar and brown rice is quite poor nutritionally. It contains more fiber, which is good - 3.5 grams per cup compared to half a gram for white rice - and slightly fewer carbohydrates and calories. That said, there is not that much difference. Nutritionists love brown rice, but they also love whole wheat bread, which is pretty much the same garbage as white bread. Brown rice is not the worst thing in the world. If you want to add some carbs to your diet, small portions are fine - especially if it's not the main course and is combined with fat, protein and vegetables in a relatively low-calorie meal.

Apple cider vinegar: Quackery?

Q: Is there any truth to all the hype about apple cider vinegar? I've heard everything from weight loss benefits to acne prevention.

Dr. Bowden: Ah, apple cider vinegar. You can be sure that if this stuff had been developed at the time of multi-level marketing, it would be selling for $40 a bottle with claims ranging from curing cancer to regrowing hair on balding people.

I also wrote about apple cider vinegar in my book "The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth". Why? Because foods (or medicines) that have lived up to their reputation for hundreds or sometimes even thousands of years should get attention - even if there is no "hard" evidence of their value. If there is no evidence of an effect, this is not proof that something has no effect.

So it looks like this: Apple cider vinegar is probably a good thing, but there is little scientific evidence for its effects. This does not mean that apple cider vinegar is worthless. First of all, it's a real thing, made from natural foods and loaded with many of the same phenols found in apples.

Second, a study published in the journal Diabetes Care suggests that apple cider vinegar may promote healthy blood sugar levels. A friend of mine, Dr. Jeff Volek, a highly respected scientist, believes that salad with apple cider vinegar at the beginning of each meal has the potential to help control blood sugar levels. Unpasteurized vinegar is overloaded with nutrients and contains up to 50 different minerals, vitamins and amino acids, depending on the raw material used in its production. Is apple cider vinegar a cure-all? Probably not and it is definitely not a cure for obesity. But I always have a bottle of apple cider vinegar in the fridge. When you buy apple cider vinegar, look out for terms like unpasteurized, unfiltered, traditionally fermented or something along those lines. The process of pasteurization destroys many of the heat-sensitive vitamins and enzymes that make apple cider vinegar so healthy.

by Jonny Bowden, PhD


Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/question-of-nutrition-2

Continue reading
A question of nutrition
thumb

What kind of load

Q: I've read that the glycemic index is overrated and that what we should really be looking at is the glycemic load. What is the difference between the two?

A: The glycemic index is overrated. You should focus on glycemic load instead. There is a big difference here:

The glycemic index is a way of measuring the impact that a given amount of carbohydrate has on your blood sugar levels - something you should definitely be interested in. However, in order to make a fair comparison, a fixed amount of carbohydrate must be used. In the case of the glycemic index, it is a standard amount of 50 grams of carbohydrates in the form of a food. The problem, however, is that very few carbohydrate foods are consumed in a portion size of 50 grams of carbohydrate in real life. Imagine that you go to the store to buy spices and there is a spice that costs 500 euros per pound, which of course sounds like a lot of money. However, if you only buy half a teaspoon of this stuff, then the price is quite irrelevant. What you care about is what you pay at the checkout and not necessarily what it would cost if you bought a pound.

Similarly, you should care very little about the impact 50 grams of a food has on your blood sugar - you care about the impact of the amount you actually eat. The glycemic load is based on a more sophisticated formula that takes into account the amount of carbohydrates in grams that you eat - in other words, the portion size. The glycemic index of carrots is high, which is why a lot of people think that you should never eat carrots, which is of course a silly conclusion. The fact is that the average carrot contains only 3 grams of carbohydrates. So you'd have to eat carrots like a giant rabbit for them to have a significant impact on your blood sugar levels. The glycemic load of a carrot is only 3, which makes it a very low-glycemic food - as long as you don't drink pure carrot juice or eat 13 carrots at once.

Pasta, on the other hand, has a moderate glycemic index, but is almost never eaten in small portions. If you consider the portion size of a typical serving of pasta, your blood sugar levels will skyrocket and stay there for a week. It is therefore not surprising that the glycemic load of pasta is very high. The technical formula for the glycemic load is the GI (glycemic index) multiplied by the amount of carbohydrates in the portion in grams, after which the result is divided by 100. A low glycemic load is between 1 and 10, a medium glycemic load is between 10 and 20 and anything over 20 is considered a very high glycemic load. In all these considerations, however, you should also bear in mind that both the glycemic index and the glycemic load only refer to a food consumed on its own. Add some fat or protein and the overall impact will decrease. And many high glycemic foods are good for you (e.g. carrot juice), while many low glycemic foods are not (e.g. fried donuts).

So you should take your glycemic load into account, but not be a slave to it. It is merely a value that you should take into account when planning your diet. Athletes who train intensively can even benefit from high-glycemic foods, especially if you train twice a day. But Mrs. Schmitt with metabolic syndrome... please not so much!

The best fat loss supplement

Q: You once wrote that fiber is the best supplement for fat loss. What do you mean by that? And how much fiber does the average athletic man need per day?

A: High blood sugar levels and insulin are the enemy of fat loss, and a high-fiber diet helps keep blood sugar levels (and insulin levels) in a healthy range. The more fiber you eat, the lower the glycemic impact of the food. And the slower the sugar enters your bloodstream, the less damage it is likely to do.

Fiber also keeps you fuller for longer, which means you're less likely to binge eat. And since fiber keeps your blood sugar levels in a nice comfortable range, you're less likely to suffer from nighttime cravings. And then there's the added fact that fiber is primarily found in foods that tend to be rich in antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds.

As great as protein and fat are, both provide zero fiber. Nearly all of us - including athletes - need more fiber than we typically consume. Our paleolithic ancestors - a good population model for the ideal diet - ate between 50 and 100 grams of fiber per day. The average American and Western European, on the other hand, consumes just 4 to 11 grams of fiber per day. I don't usually agree with mainstream conventional health organizations when it comes to dietary advice, but in this case, most of them are right. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends between 25 and 38 grams of fiber per day, with the recommended amount for "active" people being even higher. Active men between the ages of 14 and 50, for example, should consume between 42 and 45 grams of fiber per day.

If you're not eating loads of vegetables and beans, then this probably means you could benefit from a fiber supplement such as cellulose fiber, psyllium husk or bran.

However, when increasing your fiber intake, make sure to drink more water. If you don't do this, then you'd better get used to constipation.

Turmeric: the super spice

Q: You wrote in your book 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth that the spice turmeric deserves a whole book to itself. What's so great about this stuff - apart from the fact that it makes Indian food so delicious?

A: The active ingredient in turmeric is curcumin, a member of the class of plant chemicals known as curcuminoids. Curcumin has anti-cancer properties and even the very conservative American Cancer Society says on its website that curcumin "has demonstrated some anti-cancer effects."

Different types of cancer cells have been inhibited by curcumin in the laboratory and it has been shown to slow the spread of cancer in some animal studies. It is a powerful antioxidant with strong anti-inflammatory effects and since inflammation is a component of almost every degenerative disease on the planet, this is quite an impressive resume.

And as if that wasn't enough, curcumin is one of the most liver-friendly compounds on the planet, which is one of the reasons you'll find curcumin in almost every liver detox supplement.

The best oils

Q: We all know that extra virgin olive oil is very healthy and after reading your interview on T-Nation, I started using coconut oil as well. What other oils do you recommend?

A: I'm glad to hear that you've started using coconut oil, which is the most underrated oil in my opinion. I consume at least a jar of organic coconut oil every month. Okay, I'm exaggerating, but I use it for everything from roasting vegetables and shrimp to scrambling eggs.

Even though I wrote a cookbook called "The World's Healthiest Meals", I'm not much of a cook, but I can tell you that for high-heat frying, macadamia oil - which contains even more oleic acid than olive oil - avocado oil and hazelnut oil are the best.

Heating extra virgin olive oil to a temperature at which it starts to smoke is not a particularly good idea. This destroys the delicate compounds that are retained when the oil is cold-pressed - and then what is the point of using extra virgin olive oil? Peanut oil only starts to smoke at a very high temperature, which is very good from a cooking point of view, but unfortunately peanut oil also contains a very high proportion of omega-6 fatty acids. Omega-6 fatty acids are not necessarily bad, but we generally consume too many omega-6 fatty acids and not enough omega-3 fatty acids anyway, so using peanut oil for frying can further contribute to this imbalance.

Diet and acne

Q: I am in my late twenties and still suffer from acne. I have heard for years that our diet has no effect on acne. Is that true?

A: That's about as true as saying you can't get pregnant the first time.

The notion that diet has nothing to do with acne is an old wives' tale put out there by some very dubious studies funded by the chocolate industry in the late sixties.

I talked about some of the causes of acne in my book "The Most Effective Cures on Earth", the conclusion being that very few people suffered from acne in the time of hunter-gatherer societies, whereas a large percentage of people who follow a Western diet suffer from acne.

And in 2002, Loren Cordain, PhD, dealt the final blow to the theory that there is no link between diet and acne with a study in which not a single case of acne was found in two societies that did not eat a Western-style diet. These people ate tubers, fruit, fish and coconuts. In other words, the Paleolithic diet of our hunter-gatherer ancestors is the best diet for people who suffer from acne. This diet includes what I call the four food groups: Foods you can fish, hunt, gather and pick.

The bottom line is that the Western diet, with all its sugar and starch and white junky carbs, can activate the same genes and upregulate the same hormones that can exacerbate acne. You can easily test this for yourself: if your food doesn't resemble anything you might encounter on the savannah in Africa, then you shouldn't be eating it.

The truth about potatoes

Q: What about normal potatoes? Are they a healthy vegetable? Are sweet potatoes better?

A: Regular potatoes are garbage.

I had this discussion with Dr. John McDougall of Vegetarian-Diet fame and I told him that the "body" looks at a bowl of white potatoes the same way it looks at a large serving of sugar. He argued that this was nonsense and I told him to go back and retake his biochemistry course. But to be fair, of course potatoes can be part of a "healthy overall diet" as those idiots at the American Dietetic Association would call it. But they'd say the same thing about M&Ms.

And of course they're better than Twinkies, and of course they contain small amounts of healthy things. But for the most part, they are a nutritional lightweight and anyone who suffers from blood sugar problems should stay away from potatoes. The fact that, in America at least, they're usually served with low-quality cheese products and bacon doesn't necessarily make it any better.

Sweet potatoes are definitely a better choice. At least they contain good nutrients. Of course, they're not much better from a blood sugar perspective, but this needn't be a cause for concern for everyone - especially bodybuilders. If you do, you're better off avoiding sweet potatoes too, or at least eating smaller portions of them.

Eating at night

Q: What do you think of the idea of stopping eating at a certain time of the day when it comes to fat loss? I've read of people not eating after 5pm, while others stop eating at 8pm. Is eating before bedtime a bad thing if you want to lose fat?

A: Adele Davis, one of the early pioneers of nutrition and the first to support the use of supplements, had a motto: "Eat breakfast like a king, lunch like a prince, and dinner like a beggar."

Which, as you know, is the exact opposite of how most people eat. While those Neanderthals from the American Dietetic Association claim that it makes no difference when you eat, it's worth noting that sumo wrestlers eat a big meal before they go to sleep. While I don't think there's anything magical about the exact time (5pm, 7pm or 9pm), the concept of not going to bed on a full stomach when your pancreas is flooding your body with fat-storing insulin is a very good idea.

Instead of obsessing too much about the exact time, simply leave a few hours between your last meal and bedtime. And eat something lighter in the evening.

The perfect snack

Q: I need an evening TV snack that includes some of the healthiest foods around. Do you have any ideas?

A: Frozen blueberries and some full-fat yogurt or raw milk (if you can find it anywhere) would be a good idea. The raw milk or yogurt will freeze slightly over the blueberries and you'll have a fantastic antioxidant-rich dessert that tastes like a sorbet. Sprinkle a few slivered almonds on top for the finishing touch.

The radiation debate

Q: What is your opinion on food irradiation?

A: I'm still forming my opinion on this topic. If you promise not to hold anything I say today against me later, before I've looked into it further, I'll tell you about my current impressions on the subject.

  • The whole thing is far more complicated than it seems at first glance. Economic, political and social issues are involved and it is not just about the obvious issues of nutritional value and health (e.g. trade is affected).
  • Irradiation destroys a large amount of pathogens contained in food. But it's also a bit like pouring perfume over garbage. You can kill some microbes, but you don't change the bad conditions that are responsible for the development of those microbes such as fecal matter, manure and other agricultural contaminants.
  • And irradiated meat - while it may be free of certain pathogens - is still the same inferior product that contains steroids, hormones, antibiotics and more factory farm additives. It's just free of e-coli bacteria. Great...
  • And then, of course, there are all the unknowns. I'm not sure it's really as dangerous as the critics claim, but I'm also sure it's not as harmless and safe as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration claims. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle and I wish we could hold off on this until we at least know a little more.

by Jonny Bowden, PhD | 09/09/08


Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/question-of-nutrition-1

Continue reading
Linseed oil vs. fish oil
thumb

Are you one of those rapeseed oil guys who wouldn't eat anything with a face? Or are you a fish-eating machine that would eat pretty much any animal that doesn't wear a flea collar?

Regardless of your stance on meat vs. plant-based diets, if your goal is to look good naked, you'll probably be taking some sort of essential fatty acid supplement.

Linseed oil and fish oil are the most commonly consumed forms of essential fatty acids and many will consider these two sources of essential fatty acids to be interchangeable, but these two oils are distinctly different in many ways.

While both oils are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, there are distinct differences beyond the fact that flaxseed oil is suitable for vegetarians, while fish oil is not. Let's start with some basics about essential fatty acids. The two primary essential fatty acids (EFAs) are omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. These fatty acids are considered essential because your body cannot produce them itself and therefore they must be obtained from food.

Natural polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids

Polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acids

Alpha-linolenic acid (LNA)

Linoleic acid (LA)

Stearidonic acid (SA)

Gamma-linoleic acid (GLA)

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)

Arachidonic acid (AA)

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)

Table 1: Adapted from Fats that Heal, Fats that Kill by Udo Erasmus

According to research by Simopoulos, the typical Western diet contains about 20 times as many omega-6 as omega-3 fatty acids. When you compare this to the 2:1 ratio that scientists consider ideal, it quickly becomes clear how suboptimal our diet is in this regard.

There are three reasons for this unhealthy ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids in our diet:

  • A deficiency of omega-3 fatty acids
  • Excessive consumption of omega-6 fatty acids
  • An inability of the body to convert dietary omega-3 fatty acids into omega-3 fatty acids that can be utilized by the body

The third point is the crux of the matter: can linseed oil fulfill its role as an omega-3 supplier?

Linseed oil is not an optimal source of omega-3 fatty acids

Twelve years ago, I looked into the effects of fish oil when a trainer at my gym complained of excessively dry skin on his hands during the winter. His hands looked as if they were covered in small cuts, some of which were even bleeding. When I asked him if he was taking omega-3 fatty acids, he told me that he was taking three tablespoons of linseed oil a day.

Referring to what I had read at the time, I recommended that he replace the linseed oil with fish oil for breakfast, lunch and dinner. And the result? Within a few days his hands healed completely - no more cracks and no more bleeding.

Why couldn't linseed oil do its job?

Linseed oil is one of the richest sources of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and contains over 50% ALA, which is why it is often referred to as one of the best sources of omega-3 fatty acids. The problem, however, is that the omega-3 fatty acids contained in linseed oil cannot be sufficiently converted into the actually important "players" in the body. The omega-3 fatty acids contained in linseed oil are simple ALS, which is a precursor to the magical EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acids. However, just because linseed oil increases ALA levels in the blood does not mean that your body will convert this ALA into EPA and DHA. To confirm this, a 12-week study showed that linseed oil was not efficiently converted to DHA. Another study lasting 4 weeks showed that the EPA concentrations that could be achieved with the help of linseed oil were only half as high as when fish oil was used.

The inadequate conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA is related to competitive enzyme inhibition. Based on the fatty acid flow chart below, there are a number of intermediate steps that must be completed before ALA can be converted to EPA and then to DHA.

A very important enzyme called delta-6-desaturase (D6D) is required for this conversion.

Alpha-linolenic acid (linseed)

↓

Δ-6 Desaturase
↓
Octadecatetraenoic acid
↓
Elongase enzyme
↓
Eicosatetraenoic acid
↓
Δ5 Desaturase
↓
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)
↓
Elongase enzyme
↓
Docosapentaenoic acid
↓
Δ4 Desaturase
↓
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)

Scientific research suggests that the amount of D6D decreases as we age. While we can't do much about the numbers on our birth certificate, it should be noted that diabetes, trans fats, alcohol and radiation have also been identified as causes of declining D6D levels.

If you're a regular reader of this site, then you should know how important blood sugar control is, so diabetes probably shouldn't be a concern. And if looking good naked is somewhere on your agenda, your trans fat consumption is likely to be minimal and your alcohol consumption below Lindsay Lohan levels.

As for radiation, it's everywhere. However, there are ways to minimize it. There are also some key nutrients you can supplement to build your D6D capacity, which include zinc and magnesium. Most of us are deficient in these two super minerals, which are crucial for many aspects of overall health.

(A tip on magnesium: if you have chocolate cravings all the time, this is a sign that you could be suffering from a magnesium deficiency. So if you've just eaten your child's birthday cake, you might want to get yourself some ZMA® ).

A second chance for flaxseed?

While flaxseed oil is probably not an effective way to get the amounts of EPA and DHA your body so desperately needs, flaxseed does have some benefits. Flaxseed is available in three forms: whole flaxseed, ground flaxseed and flaxseed oil. I prefer my clients to take whole flaxseed or ground flaxseed as both are an excellent source of fiber. Fiber helps cleanse the intestines and supports blood sugar control, which can lead to lower body fat levels.

Whole flaxseeds also contain lignans, which have been shown to affect estrogen levels. Many of my clients have symptoms of high estrogen levels and when I run hormone tests on them, 90% of them have elevated estradiol levels.

There are two primary reasons for this. Number one is estrogen mimicking compounds that are found in our environment called xenoestrogens. We are increasingly bombarded with xenoestrogens in the form of contaminated water and food, chemicals such as pesticides and herbicides, and plastics containing bisphenol A. The ugly thing about these little monsters is that they alter the conversion of cholesterol into steroid hormones.

Reason number two is the high activity of the enzyme aromatase. Aromatase is an enzyme that converts androgens like testosterone and androstenedione into estrogen. Remember all the hype about prohormones in the late nineties? Everyone had visions of cracking Mark McGuire's locker and reaching Bic Mac's proportions. Unfortunately, this is a prime example of something that looked good on paper but didn't work in the human body.

The main problem with androstenedione was that it can be converted into both testosterone and estrogen. So while some guys got more muscular and stronger from this stuff, others grew breasts and started asking their training partners if their training pants made their butts look bigger.

To reduce the amount of xenoestrogens you are exposed to, the first thing you need to do is reduce the amount of xenoestrogens you are exposed to. Limit the use of plastic, store your food in glass containers instead of plastic or Tupperware and never heat food in plastic packaging in the microwave. By doing so, you are giving your body real xenoestrogen injections.

As for aromatase, this is where the lignans in whole flaxseeds come in. Flaxseeds are the richest source of the plant lignan secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG0) - a type of phytoestrogen similar in structure to endogenous sex hormones.

After consumption, the intestinal flora metabolizes SDG to enterodiol (ED) and enterolactone (EL), which are also known as mammalian lignans. There are studies that show that ED and EL both inhibit the aromatase enzyme.

Although I do not recommend flaxseed oil as a source of omega-3 fatty acids, I would recommend consuming flaxseed in shredded form or even as whole flaxseeds to inhibit the effects of the aromatase enzyme.

Use both to your advantage

In our world of Frankenstein foods and toxic fats, it's a smart idea to make omega-3 fatty acids a top priority - but relying on flaxseed oil is not such a good idea. Whether your goal is to build muscle, lose fat or boost your performance, an animal source of essential fatty acids like fish oil is much more effective than flaxseed oil.

But don't throw the flaxseed out with the fatty acid bath water. Whole or crushed flaxseeds still have important health benefits to offer. Try using a high quality fish oil supplement to meet your EPA and DHA needs and use some high fiber whole flaxseed for its benefits in blood sugar control and aromatase inhibition. While this may not help you land a vegan girlfriend, with more muscle, less fat and better overall health, I'd be very surprised if you have a hard time finding a carnivore to keep you company.

References

  1. Adlercreutz H, Bannwart C, Wähälä K, Mäkelä T, Brunow G, Hase T, Arosemena PJ, Kellis JT, Vickery LE. Inhibition of human aromatase by mammalian lignans and isoflavonoid phytoestrogens. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 44:147-153, 1993
  2. Barceló-Coblijn G, Murphy EJ, Othman R, Moghadasian MH, Kashour T, Friel JK. Flaxseed oil and fish-oil capsule consumption alters human red blood cell n-3 fatty acid composition: a multiple-doing trial comparing 2 sources of n-c fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Sep;88(3):801-9.
  3. Basch R, Bent S, Collins J, Dacey C, Hammerness P, Harrison M, Smith M, Szapary P, Ulbricht C, Vora M, Weissner W. Natural Standard Resource Collaboration. Flax and flax seed oil (Linum Usitatissimum) a review by the Natural Standard Research Colloboration. J Soc Integr Oncol 2007 Summer 5; (3): 92-105.
  4. Borriello SP, Setchell, KDR, Axelson M, Lawson AM. Production and metabolism of lignans by the human faecal flora. J Appl Bacteriol, 58:37-43, 1985.
  5. Erasmus, Udo. Fats that Heal Fats that Kill. Alive Books. Barnaby BC Canada. 1997.
  6. Simopoulos, Artemis. The Omega Diet. Harper Collins. New York, NY. 1999.
  7. Frye C, Bo E, Calamandrei G, Calzà L, Dessì-Fulgheri F, Fernández M, Fusani L, Kah O, Kajta M, Le Page Y, Patisaul HB, Venerosi A, Wojtowicz AK, Panzica GC. Endocrine Disrupters: a Review of SOMe Sources, Effects, and Mechanisms of Actions on Behavior and Neuroendocrine Systems. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011 Sep 27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02229.x. (Epub ahead of print)
  8. Horrin DF. Loss of delta-6-desaturase activity as a key factor in aging. Med Hypotheses. 1981 Sep;7(9):1211-1220.
  9. Lord, RS & Bralley JA. Laboratory Evaluations for Integrative and Functional Medicine. Duluth, GA: Metametrix Institute.
  10. Liu S, Baracos VE, Quinney HA, Clandin MT. Dietary omega-3 and polyunsaturated fatty acids modify fatty acyl composition and insulin binding in skeletal-muscle sarcolemma. Biochem J. 1994 May 1;299 (Pt 3): 831-7.
  11. Mantzioris, E, James MJ, Gibson RA, Cleland LG. Dietary substitution with an α-linolenic acid-rich vegetable oil increases eicosapentaenoic acid concentrations in tissues. Am J Clin Nutr-1994-Mantzioris-1304-9.
  12. Shimp JL, Bruckner L, Kinsella JE. The effects of dietary trilinoelaidin on fatty acid and acyl desaturases in rat liver. J Nutr. 1982 Apr;112(4):722-35.

By Robert Yang

Continue reading
Fuck your diet and stay defined!
thumb

How to end a diet without getting fat afterwards

You've found your abs - now what?

Dieting is a challenge, but the next phase is even harder. If you're not careful, things can get pretty ugly pretty quickly. Some refer to it as "reverse dieting". It's the phase after the diet and after the calorie restriction has ended. Reverse in this context means that you gradually start to increase your calorie intake again. It sounds simple, but your body is working against you.

The metabolic problem

After a fat loss diet, the goal is to find a new maintenance calorie intake. This calorie intake is the amount of calories you need to maintain your new body weight. How do you find this calorie amount? By slowly increasing your calories compared to your calorie intake during the diet. But there's a big problem.

Scientific research shows that your metabolic rate slows down after prolonged calorie restriction. Because of this reduced metabolic rate, your body prefers a fat-storing state on a physiological level. Not good. If you suddenly return your body to the amount of calories you were eating before you started your diet, you will build up body fat.

It's easy to decide on specific amounts of calories and macronutrients you want to target, but hunger can easily take on a life of its own and derail your good intentions. One spoonful of ice cream can easily turn into a whole carton. If this scenario becomes a habit, you'll experience rapid fat gain accompanied by a softer appearance, digestive issues, lack of energy and decreased motivation.

The hunger games

Prolonged calorie restriction will lead to increased hunger, a reduced metabolic rate and a decrease in activity.

Much of this is related to hormonal responses such as increases in ghrelin levels - also known as the hunger hormone - and decreases in levels of metabolic hormones such as T3 and T4. Scientists have observed this in men and women of all ages and body types, as well as in bodybuilders during competition preparation.

Dr. David Ludwig says, "Something has caused our fat cells to go into a calorie-storing turbo mode, causing them to soak up too many calories. As a result, there are too few calories in the bloodstream. So the brain does what it's supposed to do - it makes you hungry."

Many people claim to be hungrier after a diet than during the diet itself. When you lose weight, your hunger increases, while your energy expenditure decreases due to a reduction in non-exercise-induced thermogenesis (NEAT, a measure of calories burned through unconscious movement).

The opposite is true if your weight is above your set point and you consume more calories than you burn over a longer period of time: your appetite decreases and your thermogenic activity increases.

What can we do about this?

First of all, you should eat foods that help you minimize your hunger. After dieting, people overlook the food sources they choose and the cascade of hormonal responses these foods cause. The glycemic load of a meal has an impact on hunger (Note: glycemic load describes the quantity and quality of carbohydrates in a food or meal. A piece of watermelon and a donut have the same glycemic index but a very different glycemic load).

Think about the following. When dieting, people choose higher quality, minimally processed foods that are high in fiber and high in volume. They tend to choose carbohydrates with a lower glycemic index (e.g. sweet potatoes, green vegetables, whole grain oatmeal) and try to get full on fewer calories and by eating foods with a higher micronutrient content.

However, after eating this way during the diet, the dieter seems to forget what helped them achieve this body in the first place and may even feel entitled to eat the foods they gave up during their diet.

Even if the dieter has intentionally increased their fat and carbohydrate macronutrients to end the strict diet, this attempt to "normalize" their nutritional situation may cause them to feel more hungry than before. This is part of the reason that eating highly processed foods, which cause a rapid rise in insulin levels, will lead to increased fat storage and more post-meal hunger.

To understand this, we need to take a closer look at our hormones. A crucial aspect of your body's response to a meal is what happens to the hormones insulin and glucagon. Insulin is considered anabolic. It transports nutrients to your liver, your muscles and, unfortunately, your fat cells. Glucagon is considered catabolic. It helps the body break down stored nutrients such as glycogen and fat.

A study conducted by Dr. Ludwig looked at the effects of the glycemic index and hunger responses. The three subgroups of subjects were given different meals, all with the same calorie content, but one group ate a meal with a low glycemic load, one group ate a meal with a medium glycemic load and the third group ate a meal with a high glycemic load.

Meal with low glycemic load

Meal with medium glycemic load

Meal with a high glycemic load

55g whole egg

63.9g Wholemeal oat flakes

60.9g Instant rolled oats

45g egg white

180g milk (2% fat)

180g milk (2% fat)

40g low-fat cheese

15g cream

15g cream

200g spinach

16g fructose

19g dextrose

30g tomato

0g saccharin

0,2g saccharin

185g grapefruit

397g water

397g water

115g apple slices

Macronutrients (% carbohydrates/protein/fat)

40/30/30

64/16/20

64/16/20

Energy density (KJ/g)

2,46

2,52

2,52

The high GI group experienced the greatest increase in insulin levels, followed by a collapse. This group also had the weakest glucagon response. This is a recipe for fat storage.

Another interesting finding was the significant increase in adrenaline levels at the high GI meal compared to the low and medium GI meals. This insulin response strongly contributes to an increase in hunger as it mimics a response to a situation of (starvation).

The coolest thing about this study is that it tells us why people exceed their calorie and nutrient goals despite good intentions to stick with a specific plan. Members of the group that consumed the meal with the highest glycemic index consumed many more calories (600 to 700 kcal more) during the 5 hours following the meal than members of the other two groups. Maintaining good eating habits at one meal can therefore dramatically increase the likelihood that you will stay on plan for the next meal.

Another study showed very similar results. This study was a double-blind, cross-over design in which all groups consumed the same amounts of macronutrients. The meals differed only in the GI of the carbohydrates consumed. The group that consumed carbohydrates with a higher GI reported more hunger than the group that consumed carbohydrates with a low GI.

The most surprising result was that the activity of the nucleus accumbens was significantly increased in the group that consumed the high GI carbohydrates. This part of the brain is associated with dependence and addiction. In this area, your brain releases dopamine, which is why this area is also known as the feel-good center of the brain. This data gives us a clue as to why many people feel that they can no longer resist the urge to eat.

So when you're told that all carbs are the same and it doesn't matter if you eat your carbs in the form of sweet potatoes or donuts, it's important to remember that your body will react differently to those carbs regardless of the calories.

How you can combat the build-up of fat

Eat meals with a low glycemic load. Choose high fiber vegetables, low glycemic index carbohydrates and stick to a balanced diet. This will optimize the hormonal cascade after a meal and reduce your cravings so you stay full longer. Working with your body instead of against it will help you stay on track.

If you absolutely want to include highly processed foods in your daily diet, eat them before your workout. This may not be optimal for performance, but it will allow your body to use that glucose during exercise and reduce the likelihood of that glucose being stored as fat. This will prevent the negative reactions that would otherwise be seen.

Another tip: Various supplements such as chromium picolinate, cinnamon extract and even turmeric have been shown to help normalize blood sugar levels. This can improve the way additional carbohydrates are processed and used in your diet, while minimizing the risk of fat storage.

How should you increase your calories?

You need to get out of the calorie deficit and try to figure out what your new maintenance calorie amount is. The best approach to this will vary depending on how lean you want to stay and how your body responds to an increase in calorie intake. For some it will be perfectly fine to increase daily calorie intake by 500 kcal, while others will need to take a more conservative approach.

What makes this phase complicated is the fact that you can gain several kilos on the scales without putting on any fat. This is often simply the result of a replenishment of glycogen stores and a rebuilding of intramuscular triglycerides. You should be aware of this fact.

You should also remember that while it is important to pay attention to macronutrients, it is at least as important to make smart food choices that minimize your hunger so that you stay on track.

What about cardio training?

The best way to do cardio will vary from person to person based on numerous different factors: how much cardio you've done before, what type of cardio, what intensity, etc. Using high-intensity interval training (HIIT) as your primary form of cardio is an excellent choice, according to one idea.

HIIT will significantly increase your EPOC (post-exercise oxygen consumption) - also known as the afterburn effect - which means it will rev up your metabolism, which has been impaired in its rate. You will burn more calories during the rest of the day and be better able to cope with the extra calories you consume after the diet.

HIIT will also affect your strength adaptations to your weight training much less, if at all, compared to low intensity cardio. If you have experienced a loss of strength during your diet, the last thing you want to do is exacerbate this strength deficit with too much incorrect cardio training.

HIIT can also help you maintain your muscle mass and has even been shown in some studies to induce a hypertrophy response, while cardio training at a consistent lower intensity can attenuate the protein synthesis (muscle growth) response to weight training.

As your metabolism recovers over time, you should reduce the number of cardio training sessions and their duration.

References

  1. Pardue A. Case Study: Contest Preparation Diet Effects On A Drug-Free Bodybuilder. May 2016.
  2. Rossow LM, Fukuda DH, Fahs CA, Loenneke JP, Stout JR. Natural bodybuilding competition preparation and recovery: A 12-month case study. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2013;8(5):582–592. doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.5.582.
  3. Kistler BM, Fitschen PJ, Ranadive SM, Fernhall B, Wilund KR. Case study: Natural bodybuilding contest preparation. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2014;24(6):694–700. doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0016.
  4. De Pergola, G., et al. "Free triiodothyronine and thyroid stimulating hormone are directly associated with waist circumference, independently of insulin resistance, metabolic parameters and blood pressure in overweight and obese women." Clinical endocrinology 67.2 (2007): 265-269.
  5. Reinehr, T., and W. Andler. "Thyroid hormones before and after weight loss in obesity." Archives of disease in childhood 87.4 (2002): 320-323.
  6. Greenway FL. Physiological adaptations to weight loss and factors favoring weight regain. International Journal of Obesity (2005).
  7. Ludwig, David S., et al. "High glycemic index foods, overeating, and obesity." Pediatrics 103.3 (1999): e26-e26.
  8. Lennerz, Belinda S., et al. "Effects of dietary glycemic index on brain regions related to reward and craving in men." The American journal of clinical nutrition 98.3 (2013): 641-647.
  9. Docherty JP, Sack DA, Roffman M, Finch M, Komorowski JR. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory trial of chromium picolinate in atypical depression: effect on carbohydrate craving. J Psychiatr Pract. 2005 Sep;11(5):302-14.4.
  10. Safdar, Mahpara, et al. "Effect of various doses of cinnamon on blood glucose in diabetic individuals." Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 3.5 (2004): 268-272.
  11. Helms, E. R., et al. "Recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: resistance and cardiovascular training." Journal of Sports Medicine Physical Fitness 55 (2015): 164-178.
  12. Borsheim E, Bahr R. Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Med. 2003;33(14):1037-1060
  13. Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, Wilson SM, Leoneeke JP, Anderson JC. Concurrent training: a meta analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercise. J. Strnegth Cond. Res. Oct 13 2011.

By Christopher Barakat

Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/ditch-your-diet-stay-ripped

Continue reading
The hidden fat loss hormones
thumb

Control them and get hard and defined more easily

When you think of hormones, especially in the fitness and bodybuilding world, you probably think of things like testosterone, insulin, cortisol and growth hormone. You probably won't think of GLP and GIP.

GLP and GIP are hormones of the digestive tract and your ability to get hard and defined can stand or fall with them. The funny thing is, most people have never heard of these hormones and even experts didn't fully understand their full impact until recently.

The unexpected revelations of a gastric bypass

Gastric bypass surgery has become the treatment of choice for severely obese patients. This surgery can also be seen as proof that the calorie model of metabolism is correct.

When this surgery was originally developed, the idea was to reduce the volume of food that could be eaten. It was believed that the observed fat loss was based solely on the fact that patients were eating less or absorbing less food. It was believed that this reduced calorie intake was the only reason for the weight loss.

If you physically reduce the size of the stomach, then the patient can't eat as much as before and loses weight. That was the theory and reducing calorie intake definitely plays a role. But is that the whole story?

Slowly, a new understanding of what is happening developed. There is an unintended and only recently discovered consequence of these gastric bypass operations: reduced hunger and (to a lesser extent) reduced cravings. How can this be? This surgery does not take place in the brain, which is the area that controls these feelings.

Even more interesting is the fact that in a high percentage of patients who suffered from diabetes or insulin resistance before the surgery, these problems disappeared completely. Imagine that before the surgery you were plagued by constant hunger, insatiable cravings and diabetes and as you recover from the surgery you realize that your hunger and cravings have disappeared and your diabetes has been cured.

What is happening here?

The positive effects that this surgery has on metabolism and weight loss are not simply a matter of calories, but are related to an unintended manipulation of the endocrine properties of the mucous membranes of the digestive tract. Endocrine in this context refers to the hormonal activity of the digestive tract.

The digestive system is not simply a place where food is digested and absorbed. The digestive system also secretes hormones.

In order to absorb food and regulate metabolism, the body needs a way to enable communication between the brain, pancreas and other organs and tissue types regarding the type of food being fed. Is the food a large bowl of sweet cereal that requires a large amount of insulin? Or is it a huge steak that will linger in the stomach for a while to be digested?

Our digestive tract is lined with sensory cells that "examine" the food that has been eaten. These cells provide the body with information about the quantity and composition of the food consumed and send signals via hormones/peptides to the brain, pancreas, fat cells, etc.

It is now believed that these hormones of the digestive tract are the primary mechanism by which these operations exert their effects.

GLP and GIP

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and the glucagon-like peptide (GLP) are probably the two most important hormones. These hormones are also known as incretins.

These two hormones switch off hunger in the brain and stimulate the release of insulin as soon as they perceive large amounts of glucose. These two hormones are the reason why glucose injected directly into a vein causes much less insulin to be released than the same amount of glucose consumed.

GIP is secreted by so-called K sensory cells that line the digestive tract in the upper small intestine where food leaves the stomach (the duodenum). GLP is secreted by the L sensory cells, which are also located in the duodenum, but have a higher concentration in the lower part of the intestine.

With gastric bypass, GIP concentrations are reduced while GLP levels are increased. This is because the area of the intestine that contains most of the GIP-secreting cells is bypassed and no longer has contact with the food, while most of the areas that secrete GLP remain intact.

GIP and GLP have very different effects on metabolism, they both suppress appetite and both cause insulin secretion (but only in the presence of glucose). Obese people and diabetics have reduced GLP activity and the influence of GIP on the pancreas is suppressed.

GPL has several effects that make it very beneficial for diabetics and obese people compared to GIP. GLP reduces the levels of the hormone glucagon - a hormone that is out of control in diabetes and causes glucose to be continuously released from the liver. GLP also helps the body to produce new, more functional pancreatic cells, restoring the correct function of the insulin mechanism.

GLP also reduces the breakdown of muscle tissue. It also slows down the release of food from the stomach, which means that other hunger hormones (such as ghrelin) remain suppressed for longer.

All of this leads to more GLP, less GIP, lower glucagon levels (which normalizes blood sugar), restoration of insulin sensitivity and reactivity, suppressed appetite, reduced cravings and increased fat burning. These changes positively influence the amount of calories consumed.

Note: We do not yet know how long this effect lasts, as some patients regain the weight they have lost over the years, but rarely to the weight they once had.

What does this mean for us?

All of this shows us that weight loss is not simply a matter of calorie math, but involves complex interactions of hormonal biochemistry.

Most people do not need to undergo expensive and risky surgery to reap the same effects and benefits. GLP and GIP levels can also be manipulated with food. Fiber (especially viscous fiber), protein, bitter foods, probiotics and other factors are also able to manipulate the sensory cells of the digestive tract, thereby reducing hunger, helping with cravings and restoring insulin sensitivity.

How can you use this science for fat loss?

  1. Use GIP and GLP to your advantage by eating foods that stimulate their appetite suppressing effects but not their insulin stimulating effects. This means protein, fat and fiber without starch and sugar. Protein, fat and fiber will all have an impact on GIP and GLP, and as long as you don't eat large amounts of starch or sugar during the same meal, you will get full faster and stay full longer.
  2. Never combine fat and starch/sugar. This combination will greatly increase GIP levels and lead to higher insulin secretion over time.
  3. Choose viscous fiber. This type of fiber lines the digestive tract and makes it "think" there is more food in the digestive tract than there really is. Using a fiber-based drink as a snack is an excellent way to take advantage of this effect. The best fibers for this purpose are oat bran, acacia and glucomannan. But be careful, because if these fibers are consumed in combination with sugar or starch, you can achieve exactly the opposite effect. Remember that you are using fiber to control your appetite, not to eliminate it. Avoid products that are designed to eliminate appetite and are overloaded with sweeteners.
  4. Eat the right carbohydrates. High-fiber carbohydrates such as non-starchy vegetables and less sweet fruits have the best fiber to sugar/starch ratio. These are the carbohydrates you should prioritize.
  5. Branched-chain amino acids - and leucine in particular - can have a special effect on GLP. A BCAA supplement that is used as a snack and not simply to promote post-workout recovery may be a wise choice.

References

  1. Shalev A1, Holst JJ, Keller U. Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36 amide) on whole-body protein metabolism in healthy man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1997 Jan;27(1):10-6.
  2. Vendrell J1, et al. Study of the potential association of adipose tissue GLP-1 receptor with obesity and insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2011 Nov;152(11):4072-9. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1070. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
  3. Chen Q1, Reimer RA. Dairy protein and leucine alter GLP-1 release and mRNA of genes involved in intestinal lipid metabolism in vitro. Nutrition. 2009 Mar;25(3):340-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
  4. Bueter M1, le Roux CW. Gastrointestinal hormones, energy balance and bariatric surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Sep;35 Suppl 3:S35-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.146.
  5. Tadross JA1, le Roux CW. The mechanisms of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Apr;33 Suppl 1:S28-32. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.14.
  6. Shin AC1, Berthoud HR. Food reward functions as affected by obesity and bariatric surgery. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Sep;35 Suppl 3:S40-4. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.147.

By Dr. Jade Teta

Source: https://www.t-nation.com/diet-fat-loss/the-hidden-fat-loss-hormones

Continue reading

You might also like this View all

Are foam rollers still worth it?
Are foam rollers still worth it?
Why small active breaks make sense in an office job
Why small active breaks make sense in an office job
What does the body need saturated fatty acids for?
What does the body need saturated fatty acids for?