Training

Build muscle
thumb

Here is a short summary:

  1. Increase the number of mitochondria in your muscle cells and increase your strength and strength endurance
  2. By maintaining the health of your mitochondria, you can potentially control metabolic disease and heart disease, as well as lower your risk of prostate cancer, diabetes and hundreds of other diseases.
  3. By increasing your mitochondrial density, you can potentially live much longer and increase your chances of never seeing the inside of a hospital.
  4. You can easily influence your mitochondrial health and density through exercise and dietary manipulation.

You are electric

Every millisecond, hundreds of thousands of tiny cellular components called mitochondria pump protons across a membrane to generate electrical charges equivalent to the force of a lightning strike over a distance of a few micrometers.

And if you look at energy in general, gram for gram your body generates 10,000 times more energy than the sun - even when you're sitting still. Each cell contains an average of 300 to 400 of these often-ignored energy-producing cellular organs - about 10 million billion in your entire body. If you somehow managed to stack all your mitochondria and put them on a scale, these mitochondria would make up roughly 10% of your body weight. The whole thing is even more amazing when you consider that these mitochondria have their own DNA and reproduce independently. That's right, they are not part of you. They are in fact alien life forms, free-living bacteria that adapted to live in larger cells about two billion years ago.

But they are not parasitic in any way. Biologically, they are symbionts and without them you could hardly move a muscle and without them none of the thousands of biological functions in your body could take place. In a broader sense, mitochondria have shaped human existence. Not only do they play a huge role in energy production, sex and fertility, but also in ageing and death.

If you could somehow influence your mitochondria, you could theoretically double your lifespan without contracting any of the diseases typically associated with old age. You could avoid metabolic diseases like Syndrome X, which affects about 47 million Americans, while maintaining the energy of your youth into old age.

From an athletic perspective, controlling the vitality and number of mitochondria in your muscles could lead to tremendous improvements in strength and endurance that would not diminish in the years to come.

Fortunately, I'm not tempting you with things that might happen at some point in the future. Controlling your mitochondria is within your reach - right now. But before we talk about how mitochondria affect muscle strength and endurance, we need to take a look at some really mind-blowing stuff that will be the crux of tons of scientific research and innovation in the coming years.

Mitochondria, sex and Eve

Mitochondria are tiny organelles which, as the name suggests, are kind of like tiny organs - and like organs, they have specific functions, which in this case is the production of energy in the form of ATP - the energy currency of cells. They do this by metabolizing sugars, fats and other chemicals with the assistance of oxygen. (Every time you consume creatine, you are in a sense "feeding" your mitochondria. Creatine is transported directly into the cell, where it is combined with a phosphate group to form phosphocreatine, which is stored for later use. When energy is needed, the phosphocreatine releases its phosphate group, which combines with an ADP molecule to form ATP).

A cell may contain a single mitochondrion or hundreds of thousands of mitochondria, depending on its energy requirements. Metabolically active cells such as the cells of the liver, kidneys, heart, brain and muscles have so many mitochondria that they make up 40% of the cell, while other, lazier cells such as blood and skin cells contain very few mitochondria.

Even sperm cells contain mitochondria, but these are located in the flagellar tail of the sperm. As soon as the sperm cell hits its target - the egg - the tail breaks off and disappears into the deep ocean of prostatic fluid. This means that only the mother's mitochondria are passed on to the offspring. This happens with such unerring precision that we can trace mitochondrial genes back almost 190,000 years to a woman in Africa affectionately known as "mitochondrial Eve".

Biologists have even suggested that this phenomenon is the reason why there are two sexes instead of just one. One sex must specialize in passing on mitochondria with the egg cell, while the other must specialize in not passing them on.

Mitochondria and a long, long life

The popular idea of ageing is that as the years go by, we become more and more frail until eventually one or more parts break down beyond repair and we die.

The popular reasons for this include wear and tear or breakdown of telomeres - the nucleotide sequences at the ends of genes that are said to determine how often a cell can divide. In the case of genetic attrition, this does not seem to stand up to closer scrutiny, as such attrition accumulates at different rates in different species, and as far as the telomere theory is concerned, the decay of telomeres in different species simply shows too much divergence to pass the smell test.

Others say it's due to a drop in growth hormone production or a decline in immune system function, but why the hell is there such a decline in the first place?

What we need to do is look at the individuals or species that don't seem to suffer from the normal signs of aging. The oldest among us, those rare centenarians who appear on talk shows and brag about eating bacon every morning and drinking alcohol every day, seem to be less prone to degenerative diseases than the rest of us. They end up dying of muscle wasting rather than specific diseases. Birds also rarely suffer from degenerative diseases as they age. Mostly they fly around as they always have until one day their flying power fades and they crash-land in a sewage ditch.

The answer to the centenarians and the long, disease-free life of birds seems to lie in the mitochondria. In both cases, the mitochondria release fewer free radicals. And this is important because mitochondria often determine whether a cell lives or dies and this is dependent on the position of a single molecule - cytochrome C. Various factors including UV radiation, toxins, heat, cold, infection or pollution can cause a cell to commit suicide - or apoptosis - but the unrestricted flow of free radicals is what we are concerned with here. The underlying principle is this: depolarization of the inner mitochondrial membrane - by some kind of stress, which can be either external or internal - triggers a production of free radicals. These free radicals release cytochrome C into the cell fluid, which initiates a cascade of enzymatic reactions that fragment and dispose of the cell.

This observation led to the popular theory of mitochondrial ageing, which appeared on the scene in 1972. Dr. Denham Harman, the "father" of free radicals, observed that mitochondria are the main source of free radicals and that they are destructive and attack different components of the cell. If enough cells commit apoptosis often enough, it's like a butcher slicing up a pound of salami. The liver, kidneys, brain, immune system cells and even the heart lose mass and effectiveness slice by slice. This is thought to be the cause of the diseases associated with ageing. Dr. Harman is the reason why all kinds of foods on the market are advertised as having antioxidant power.

The problem here, however, is that Dr. Harman appears to have been wrong with his theory - at least in part. For one thing, it is difficult to target the mitochondria with antioxidant foods. It could be the wrong dosage, the wrong timing or even the wrong antioxidant. In addition, it seems that if you completely shut down the leakage of free radicals from the mitochondria, a cell commits suicide. That's not really the effect we're looking for. (This is not to say that eating antioxidants isn't good for you, but it's important to realize that this endless, single-minded pursuit of foods with higher and higher levels of antioxidants probably won't do much to prolong life).

Free radicals, in addition to telling cells to commit suicide, also appear to be responsible for fine-tuning respiration - which is also known as the production of ATP. They are involved in a delicate feedback loop that signals the mitochondria to make compensatory changes to their activities. If you completely eliminate or slow down the production of free radicals by external methods such as an extremely antioxidant-rich diet or medication, the membrane potential of the mitochondria collapses and apoptotic proteins are swept into the cell. If a large number of mitochondria do this, the cell dies. If a large number of cells do this, then the health of that organ or the overall health of the individual is compromised. In the case of free radical control, you seem to be damned if you do and damned if you don't.

So again we have to look at the old codgers and the birds. There seems to be a gene in certain Japanese men who are over a hundred years old that leads to a slight reduction in the release of free radicals. If you have this gene, then your chance of living to be 100 years old is 50% higher. At the same time, your chance of ending up in hospital for any reason is 50% lower. As for the birds, there are two things that help them. First, they can separate their electron flow from ATP production - a process known as uncoupling. This results in limiting the release of free radicals.

Secondly, birds have more mitochondria in their cells. Because they have more mitochondria, they also have more extra capacity at rest, which lowers the rate of reduction and release of free radicals.

This leads us to the following conclusion: an increase in mitochondrial density combined with a slowdown in free radical release would lead to a longer life free of most diseases typically associated with aging.

Mitochondria and a disease-free life

Because mitochondria have their own genes, they are subject to mutations that affect their health and function. If enough of these mutations come together, then this will also affect the function of the cell. And if enough cells are affected, it will also affect the organ/system of which they are a part. The organs most affected are those that are generally rich in mitochondria. These include muscles, the brain, the liver and the kidneys. Specific diseases associated with mitochondria include Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, diabetes, various vaguely diagnosed muscle weakness diseases and even Syndrome X. Look at heart patients, for example. In general, they show a reduction in mitochondrial DNA of about 40%.

And as an indication that mitochondrial deficiencies may be passed down from generation to generation, insulin-resistant children who suffer from type II diabetes, despite being young and lean, have 38% fewer mitochondria in their muscle cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction has even been identified as a marker for prostate cancer progression in patients treated with surgery. Some of these mitochondrial diseases may not become apparent until a person with altered mitochondria reaches a certain age. A youthful muscle cell, for example, has a high population of mitochondria (about 85%) that are free of mutations and can fulfill all the energy demands placed on them. However, as the number of mitochondria decreases with age, the energy demands on the remaining mitochondria increase.

At some point, a point is reached where the mitochondria can no longer produce enough energy, with the result that the affected organ begins to exhibit diminishing capacity.

Certainly, mitochondria play a critical role in the development of a variety of diseases, and maintaining a high level of normal, healthy mitochondria could likely eliminate many of these diseases.

Mitochondria and bigger, stronger muscles

You can guess that muscle cells have a lot of mitochondria and furthermore, you can easily see that the more mitochondria you have in your muscle cells, the higher your performance capacity will be. The more mitochondria you have, the more energy you can produce during training. Examples of this are mallards and pigeons, both of which are known for their endurance and have a large number of mitochondria in their breast tissue. In contrast, chickens, which don't fly very much, have very few mitochondria in their breast tissue.

However, if you were to decide to train a chicken for a bird version of a marathon, you could easily increase the number of mitochondria in that animal - but only up to a point, as the number of mitochondria is also influenced by species-specific genetics.

Fortunately, you can also increase the number of mitochondria in humans. Chronic exercise can increase mitochondrial density and the more intense the exercise, the more mitochondria are produced. If you know a delusional runner who runs over 50 miles a week, tell them that 10 to 15 minutes of running at a tight 8 mph might do more for their ultimate energy production and efficiency than increasing their weekly distance.

The high-intensity race of short duration will increase mitochondrial density to a higher degree than long-distance running, which, although it may sound somewhat ironic, will lead to better times in long-distance runs.

Training with weights also increases mitochondrial density

Type I muscle fibers, which are often referred to as slow-contracting muscle fibers or endurance muscle fibers, contain a high number of mitochondria, while the different types of fast-contracting muscle fibers - type IIa, type IIx and type IIb - are progressively less rich in mitochondria, in that order. And while it is true that heavy resistance training can convert slow-contracting muscle fibers into fast-contracting muscle fibers, the relative number and efficiency of mitochondria in each type of muscle fiber must be maintained at maximum levels or the exerciser will experience a loss of muscle quality. This is what happens as strength athletes age. An aging individual may be able to maintain most or even all of their muscle mass through intelligent training, but a loss of mitochondrial efficiency could lead to a loss of strength. A study conducted on aging men concluded that muscle strength decreases three times faster than muscle mass.

Maintaining the efficiency of mitochondria while maintaining or increasing their population would therefore have a positive effect on strength and performance regardless of age.

Take care of your mitochondria and "feed" them

Fortunately, there are a lot of ways you can improve your mitochondrial health and efficiency. There are even some ways to increase the number of mitochondria. Since the main problem with a decline in mitochondrial health associated with age seems to be related to the release of free radicals, we need to figure out how to reduce this release over a lifetime. We could probably do this through genetic modification, but given society's fear of genetic modification of all kinds, we need to put the idea of introducing new genes into our bodies on the back burner. The least controversial way seems to be good old aerobic exercise. Exercise increases the rate of electron flow, which makes the mitochondria less reactive and thereby (it seems) slows down the release of free radicals.

In addition, aerobic exercise also reduces the rate at which free radicals are released by increasing the number of mitochondria. The more mitochondria there are, the greater the free capacity at rest, which lowers the rate of reduction and reduces the production of free radicals - ultimately resulting in a longer life. Birds give us further clues. They "uncouple" their respiratory chain, which means that they separate the electron flow from ATP production. Energy is then released in the form of heat. By allowing a constant flow of electrons along the respiratory chain, the release of free radicals is limited.

As it turns out, there are several compounds that, when consumed by humans, do the same thing. One of these is the infamous insecticide/fire-retardant fat loss agent called DNP. Bodybuilders are big fans of this chemical as it causes a breakdown of fat. Users of this compound are easy to spot as they would still secrete rivulets of sweat even in a cold room. The problem here, however, is that DNP is highly toxic.

The party drug ecstasy also works well as a decoupling agent. But aside from causing serious dehydration and making the mitochondria listen to techno music while having uninhibited sex, this drug has all kinds of ethical/sociological implications that make its use problematic. Also, aspirin is a mild respiratory decoupler, which might help explain some of the strange benefits of this drug.

Another way in which we may be able to increase the number of mitochondria (which appears to have the added benefit of resulting in reduced free radical release) is through the use of supplements such as Pyrroloquinoline Quinone (PQQ).

Although PQQ is not currently considered a vitamin, its involvement in cellular signaling pathways - particularly those related to mitochondrial biogenesis - may eventually lead to it being considered essential for life. It's been shown that taking PQQ can increase the number of mitochondria, which is pretty damn exciting. Other compounds that seem to work in the same way are the diabetes drug cyanidin-3 glucoside, as it has similar metabolic properties. In fact, cyanidin-3 glucoside has been shown in laboratory studies to be very helpful in correcting or preventing mitochondrial dysfunction.

In addition to increasing the number of mitochondria, there are a number of other nutritional strategies that can improve mitochondrial function.

  • Coenzyme Q10 supports mitochondrial function.
  • Creatine provides "fuel" to the mitochondria and may also protect the mitochondria from age-related mutations.
  • Carnitine supports mitochondrial function.
  • Lipoic acid supports mitochondrial function.
  • In addition to its anti-estrogen/pro-testosterone properties, resveratrol increases the size of mitochondria and also leads to higher mitochondrial density.
  • Nitrates, found in spinach and beetroot, improve mitochondrial efficiency.
  • Calorie restriction has been shown to lead to mitochondrial genesis, which may explain how it allows certain species to live longer.
  • Vitamin D improves the oxidative function of mitochondria.

The action plan

The solutions just mentioned mean you have a lot to swallow - literally.

After thinking long and hard about this topic, I've developed a strategy based on pragmatism and the idea of potentially overlapping supplements. In other words, I've taken many of the things I've listed, but almost everything I take has additional implications than simply protecting and "feeding" the mitochondria. And if these things have the added benefit of prolonging the life of my mitochondria or increasing their efficiency, then I'm on the safe side.

Here's what I use:

  • Baby aspirin: 1 or 2 per day
  • Coenzyme Q10: 150 mg per day
  • Cyanidin-3 Glucoside: 6 capsules per day
  • Resveratrol: 3 capsules per day
  • Creatine: 5 grams per day
  • PQQ: 30 mg per day

In addition to this, I have added a healthy dose of aerobic and semi-aerobic activity to my training.

The 100-year-old strength athlete

Will "nurturing" your mitochondria really build muscle, end disease and allow you to live forever? To be as precise as the current science allows me to be, the answers are probably "sort of" and "in some ways." Increased mitochondrial efficiency and density would allow your muscles to generate more power over a longer period of time, which should be a surefire recipe for more muscle.

Since many of the diseases that plague us can be directly or indirectly linked to mitochondrial function, there is a good chance that mitochondrial support could eliminate or alleviate many of these diseases. And last but not least, it seems that a long-term reduction in the release of free radicals could theoretically extend the human lifespan by around 10 to 20%. Is it worth the effort? That's your call, of course, but the whole story is too tantalizing and potentially too rewarding to ignore.

References:

  1. Berneburg, M, et al, "Creatine supplementation normalizes mutagenesis of mitochondrial DNA as well as functional consequences," J Invest Dermal, 2005 Aug:125(2):213-20.
  2. Chilibeck, PD, "The effect of strength training on estimates of mitochondrial density and distribution throughout muscle fibers," Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 1999 Nov-Dec;80(6):604-9.
  3. Chowanadisai, W., et al, "Pyrroquinoline quinone stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis through cAMP response element-binding protein phoshphorylation and increased PGC-1 alpha expression," J Biol Chem, 2010, Jan 1;285(1):142-52.
  4. Faloon, William, "Our Aging Mitochondria," Life Extension, February 2011, pp. 7-13.
  5. Lagouge, Marie, "Resveratrol Improves Mitochondrial Function and Protects against Metabolic Disease by Activating SIRT1 and PGC-1," Cell 127, 1109-1122, December 15, 2006.
  6. Lane, Nick, "Power, Sex, and Suicide - Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life," Oxford University Press, New York, 2005.
  7. Luoma, TC, "Luoma's Big Damn Book of Knowledge," Punjab Publishers, Lahore, 2011.
  8. Mortensen SA, et al, "Coenzyme Q10: clinical benefits with biochemical correlates suggesting a scientific breakthrough in the management of chronic heart failure," Int J Tissue React. 1990;12(3):155-62.
  9. Petersen, Courtney M., et al, "Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria and Aging: A Review," Journal of Aging Research Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 194821.
  10. Rucker, Robert, "Potential Physiological Importance of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone," Alternative Medicine Review, Volume 14, Number 3, 2009.
  11. Sinha, A, et al, "Improving vitamin D status of vitamin D deficient adults is associated with improved mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle," J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):E509-13.
  12. Tanaka H, Swensen T, "Impact of resistance training on endurance performance. A new form of cross-training?" Sports Med. 1998 Mar;25(3):191-200.
  13. Tesch PA, "Skeletal muscle adaptations consequent to long-term heavy resistance exercise," Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise [1988, 20(5 Suppl):S132-4].
  14. Yu JJ, et al, "Mitochondrial function score combined with Gleason score for predicting the progression of prostate cancer," Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue, 2010 Mar;16(3):220-2.
  15. Zorov, DB, et al, "The Mitochondrion as Janus Bifrons, Biochemistry (Moscow), Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007.

From TC Luoma
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/supplements/grow-muscle-end-disease-live-longer

Continue reading
4 contentious issues ...
thumb

Here is a brief summary:

  1. Free weights and machines both have their pros and cons.
  2. Free weights can shine by forcing you to use more stabilizing muscles to control the weight. However, they are generally unable to maintain consistent tension throughout the entire range of motion.
  3. When it comes to nutrition, both quality and quantity of food play a role, but if you focus on quality, you will automatically consume fewer calories without having to count calories at all.
  4. Men and women show a wide range of responses to resistance training. In one study, gains in upper arm strength ranged from 0% to 250%. Genetics play a role.
  5. Your specific genetics may respond better to a different program. Or you may simply not be training hard enough.
  6. Daily variations of intensity and volume (sets/reps) are often more effective than weekly volume variations when it comes to increasing maximal strength.

4 Dichomoties of fitness

A dichotomy, also known as a false dilemma, is a fallacy that occurs when only two choices are presented when in reality other possible alternatives exist. These dilemmas reflect oversimplified thinking and are usually characterized by a "black or white", "this or that" presentation. Let's take a look at four common training and nutrition dichotomies.

1 - Machines vs. free weights

The whole idea of pitting free weights against machines is kind of like pitting fruits against vegetables. Both training modalities offer unique benefits that the other lacks. That's why it makes sense to use both to make your workouts more comprehensive - just like eating fruits and vegetables will make your diet more nutritious.

Free weights can shine by forcing you to use stabilizing muscles, allowing you to move a weight naturally as you not only have to control the movement of the weight, but also the path of the movement.

Free weights fail when it comes to maintaining consistent tension on the working muscles throughout the range of motion. And this is the area where machines can shine and are superior to free weights.

In other words, there is one disadvantage that all free weight exercises and all cable exercises have in common that machines do not have - gravity!

Example: During any variation of bicep curls, the point at which your biceps are maximally loaded (stimulated) is the point in the range of motion where your forearm forms a 90 degree angle with the load vector. If you are using free weights, gravity is your load vector. The point of maximum load would be the point at which your elbow reaches 90 degrees of flexion or when your forearm is parallel to the floor.

If you are doing bicep curls on a cable machine, the cable is the load vector. The point of maximum load on your biceps is the point at which your forearms form a 90 degree angle with the cable.

And here's the trick: the further you move away from a 90 degree angle with the load vector, the shorter the lever arm becomes and the less work your biceps have to do. This is the reason why the closer you get to the highest or lowest point of the range of motion, the less work your biceps have to do.

And this is also the reason why exercisers tend to pause between repetitions at the highest or lowest position of the movement when performing barbell or dumbbell curls. This is true for any exercise with free weights - they are all determined by a single load vector (gravity or the cable).

However, machines have an eccentric system that is not dependent on a single load vector like free weights or cables. Instead, the eccentric system is designed to give you a much more consistent resistance across the entire range of motion.

It also gives you much more time under tension, as your working muscles don't have the same opportunity to pause at the highest or lowest point of the movement as they do with free weights.

Even if you can only build muscle mass by using free weights, there is no reason to avoid machines. If you are looking to build strength and muscle, then you should use machines in combination with free weights.

2 - Fat loss and calories: Quantity vs. quality

Every time someone says that the ratio of the amount of calories you consume to the number of calories you burn per day is by far the most important factor when it comes to determining whether you will lose fat or not, someone else will try to refute this by highlighting the fact that the quality of the calories you eat matters. These people present the whole thing as an "either or" statement.

Scientific studies that have examined the potential benefits of diets that emphasize protein, fat or carbohydrates have found that calorie-restricted diets result in clinically meaningful fat loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize, and that it doesn't matter that some calories are more nutrient dense than others. After all, we've all heard the term "empty calories." It's easy to show that a healthy diet can also make you fat.

Ultimately, both quality and quantity of food are important factors to consider because even though it is important for overall health to consume high quality foods with a high nutrient density, you can also build fat through a healthy diet if you consume more calories than you expend.

My general recommendation is to start by focusing on the quality of the foods you eat - emphasizing fruits, vegetables, high-quality protein sources (meat, eggs, fish, etc.) and whole grains, while limiting your consumption of highly processed foods, simple sugars, hydrogenated fats and alcohol. You'll likely end up eating fewer calories without having to count calories.

3 - Genetics vs. hard work

The big problem with statements like "hard work beats talent" is that these statements always assume that "hard work" is the answer.

However, the undeniable fact is that even though hard training makes a difference to everyone - put in more time and effort and you'll get better results - some people benefit more from the same type and amount of hard work than others.

In other words, some people are more "trainable" based on their genetic predispositions when it comes to getting results from the same given exercise program. Some people put in the time and work and achieve poor results, while others do the same amount of work and achieve (much) better results.

The scientific research in this area shows that there is a strong individual, genetically influenced variance in training response to both aerobic and strength training.

One study examining the different genetic responses to aerobic exercise had 99 two-generation families perform exercise programs on a cycle ergometer to improve aerobic fitness. All families performed the same training program, which consisted of three training sessions per week with increasing intensity over a period of 20 weeks. THEN samples were taken from all 481 subjects.

The results showed clear individual differences. The range of improvement in VO2 max, for example, ranged from 0% to 100% depending on familial genetic predisposition. About 15% of the subjects showed little or no improvement, while another 15% were able to improve their VO2 max by 50% or more.

Additionally, it should be noted that variation in aerobic training response from person to person has been observed not only in studies conducted with families, but also in other studies with different populations.

In terms of different genetic responses to strength training, two studies have shown that individual differences in genes and satellite cell activity are crucial in differentiating how people respond to weight training.

The 2007 study had 66 subjects of different ages perform a four-month lower body strength training program consisting of three exercises: squats, leg presses and leg extensions. The exercise intensity for each subject was determined as a percentage of 1RM weight. A typical set consisted of 11 repetitions at 75% of the 1RM weight.

At the end of the training phase, the subjects fell into three groups: Subjects whose muscle fibers had increased in size by 50%, subjects whose muscle fibers had increased in size by 25%, and subjects who had no increase in muscle fiber size at all.

Despite identical training, the improvements ranged from 0% to 50%. David Epstein, author of The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance described this as follows:

"...differences and trainability were immense. Seventeen subjects responded extremely well to training and built enormous amounts of muscle, 32 subjects responded moderately to training and were able to make useful gains, and 17 subjects did not respond to training at all and were unable to grow muscle. It seems that some people's bodies are better prepared to benefit from training with weights, as the subjects who experienced the most extreme muscle growth had the most satellite cells in their quadriceps just waiting to be activated and build muscle."

Other studies have confirmed these results and have shown that men and women show a wide range of responses to resistance training, with some subjects making little or no gains, while others show large changes. In a study conducted with 585 subjects, changes in upper arm strength after 12 weeks of a training program ranged from 0% to 250%!

Of course, you could argue that the harder a person trains, the more likely they are to show a positive response. I certainly wouldn't dispute this. But we can't ignore the fact that some people respond poorly to certain training programs, while others respond very well to the same training programs. So if you're in the first group, it's likely that you'll achieve lower results than other people following the same training program.

The reality is this: Both hard work and genetics play a role and both influence your training results. Therefore, both factors need to be taken into account when it comes to finding the right training program and evaluating your current results.

If a person doesn't seem to respond particularly well to a training program, it may be because they are simply not training hard enough or with enough dedication.

However, there is also the possibility that this person is putting in enough dedication and work, but is simply not responding well to the training because the training program does not fit their genetic profile.

Just because someone does not respond well to one program does not mean that person will not respond well to another training program. It is therefore best to experiment with different types of training programs to look for programs to which you have a better genetic response.

The bottom line is this: While it's important to encourage everyone to train hard, it's also dangerous not to inform everyone that hard work isn't everything - it's more about your genetic response to training.

4 - Hypertrophy: high volume vs. high load

As stated in Brad Schoenfeld's seminal paper, muscle tension, metabolic stress and muscle damage are the three primary mechanisms for increasing muscle hypertrophy.

This means that both moving heavier weights at a lower volume and moving lighter weights at a higher volume can induce muscle tension and thereby generate a stimulus for muscle growth.

Not to mention that muscle damage is not simply caused mechanically by an eccentric lengthening of muscle fibers that results in actin and myosin being forcibly torn apart. Muscle damage can also occur chemically. During repeated efforts, such as those that occur during sets with a high number of repetitions, you consume more oxygen and more reactive oxygen species (ROS) or free radicals are produced. These reactive oxygen species can also cause muscle damage.

In addition, a 2002 study compared linear periodization (LP) and daily undulating periodization (ULP) for strength gains. The training consisted of 3 sets of bench presses and leg presses 3 days per week.

The LP group performed sets of 8 repetitions during weeks 1 through 4, sets of 6 repetitions during weeks 5 through 8, and sets of 4 repetitions during weeks 9 through 12. The ULP group modified their training on a daily basis (8 repetitions on Mondays, 6 repetitions on Wednesdays and 4 repetitions on Fridays).

The authors of the study concluded that program changes on a daily basis were more effective in achieving strength gains than changes every 4 weeks.

More recent studies have not only found that daily intensity and volume changes were more effective than weekly volume variations when it came to increasing maximal strength, but also that the use of undulating daily periodization could lead to greater gains in muscle thickness (mass).

What the scientific evidence tells us is that the high load vs. high volume debate is another debate we shouldn't be having, as training with heavy weights and low volume combined with training with lighter weights and higher volume in the form of undulating periodization seems to be the best approach.

References

  1. An P, Pérusse L, et al. Familial aggregation of exercise heart rate and blood pressure in response to 20 weeks of endurance training: the HERITAGE family study. Int J Sports Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):57-62.
  2. Hautala AJ, Mäkikallio TH, et al. Cardiovascular autonomic function correlates with the response to aerobic training in healthy sedentary subjects. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Oct;285(4):H1747-52.
  3. Kohrt WM1, Malley MT, et al. Effects of gender, age, and fitness level on response of VO2max to training in 60-71 yr olds. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 Nov;71(5):2004-11.
  4. Bamman MM, Petrella JK, et al. Cluster analysis tests the importance of myogenic gene expression during myofiber hypertrophy in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jun;102(6):2232-9. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
  5. Petrella JK1, Kim JS, et al. Potent myofiber hypertrophy during resistance training in humans is associated with satellite cell-mediated myonuclear addition: a cluster analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Jun;104(6):1736-42.
  6. Hubal MJ, Gordish-Dressman H, et al. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):964-72.
  7. Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2857-72.
  8. Schoenfeld, Brad J.; Contreras, Bret. Postexercise Muscle Soreness a Valid Indicator of Muscular Adaptations? Strength & Conditioning Journal: October 2013 - Volume 35 - Issue 5 - p 16-21.
  9. Rhea MR, Ball SD, et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2002 May;16(2):250-5.
  10. Prestes J, Frollini AB, et al. Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2437-42.
  11. Miranda F, Simão R, et al. Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul;25(7):1824-30.
  12. Simão R, Spineti J, et al. Comparison between nonlinear and linear periodized resistance training: hypertrophic and strength effects. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1389-95.

By Nick Tumminello

Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/4-training-and-diet-arguments-resolved

Continue reading
4 things you can learn from CrossFit
thumb

Here is a brief summary:

  1. Every Minute on the Minute (EMOM) will increase your work capacity and provide structured periods of work and rest.
  2. Training multiple strength qualities can improve your overall fitness and body composition.
  3. Gym exercises can enhance a training program with weights. Using your own body weight as resistance can increase your strength and muscle endurance.
  4. A supportive environment motivates exercisers to challenge themselves with difficult and often painful workouts.

Claw ideas

CrossFit has stolen from many fitness modalities, which include Olympic weightlifting, sprinting, powerlifting and strongman training, to name a few. Even if you're not interested in CrossFit, it can't hurt to use some of the ideas popularized by CrossFit to enhance your own workouts.

You need to look at the big picture. Every training style has its problems, but we also know that different training styles have their own merits. There's a lot we can learn from each other.

Here are the best ideas you can take from CrossFit.

1 - Every Minute On The Minute Sets

Every Minute on the Minute (EMOM) sets hold you accountable for both work and rest. They force you to focus on doing a certain amount of work within a specific amount of time. During the remaining minute, you recover for the next round of work.

There are several ways to use EMOM. Here are two of them:

  1. Load a trap bar with a 3 to 5 RM weight. Over a period of 10 minutes, perform two repetitions at the beginning of each minute. After this, you will have performed 20 reps with a fairly heavy weight in the amount of time most people would have performed two sets. This will increase your work capacity while continuing to use relatively heavy weights, which, if your priority is to be strong, will ultimately be more effective than simply doing intervals on the treadmill.
  2. Load the bar with your 10 RM weight. Perform one repetition at the beginning of the first minute. Then perform two repetitions at the start of the second minute. Do one more repetition every minute until you can no longer complete the set within a minute. This will obviously become increasingly strenuous as the gap between the end of the last set and the start of the next set gets shorter and shorter. If you manage to get to 10 repetitions, then you are doing well. If you make it to 15 reps, then you're a monster from another planet.

2 - Train multiple strength qualities during a training session

For overall fitness and body composition improvement, training multiple strength qualities within a training session will produce excellent results.

Traditional block periodization forces you to train one strength quality over a period of time (often 2 to 5 weeks). More general periodization schemes let you work on a primary strength quality over a similar period of time while also training a secondary strength quality.

Periodization methods are effective, but you should not ignore the value of training multiple strength qualities.

For example, use heavier sets with lower repetitions, followed by strength training with multi-joint exercises (in the range of 4 to 5 sets of 3 to 6 repetitions), followed by 2 to 3 sets of isolation training / low impact CNS training in the range of 8 to 12 repetitions generally associated with hypertrophy, and finish with either strength endurance training or conditioning training.

An example program could look like this:

Exercise

Sets

Rest

A

One-arm dumbbell deadlift and push-up

6

3 *

120 sec.

B1

Front squats

4

4-6

90 sec.

B2

Pull-ups with additional weight

4

4-6

90 sec.

C1

Cable pull through

3

10

60 sec.

C2

Overhead dumbbell press sitting

3

10

60 sec.

D

Concept II rowing machine

2

500 m.

180 sec.

* Single-arm dumbbell reps and push-ups - per side

So you have a power exercise followed by a non-competitive superset for strength and then less CNS taxing supersets and conditioning on the rowing machine to finish.

3 - Use more gymnast-style exercises

Exercises such as handstands, dips on rings, rope climbs and pull-ups on rings are a great way to build isometric strength, build shoulder and core stability and work the shoulders, latissimus and triceps

One of my clients is a 40 year old corporate executive and father of two. He recently performed a handstand during a dinner party. Everyone in the audience thought he must be a superhero.

As these are bodyweight exercises, you should try to perform them as part of a metabolic cycle towards the end of your training session (once you have some confidence in performing the exercises, of course.

Here is an example:

Exercise

Sets

Rest

C1

Pushing a weight sled

3

40 m.

30 sec.

C2

Pull-ups on rings

3

8

30 sec.

C3

Farmers walk

3

40 m.

30 sec.

C4

Dips on rings

3

8

60 sec.

It should go without saying that due to the lack of stability of the rings on standard dips, pull-ups and shoulder presses, you will need to be reasonably strong to perform these exercises, especially in a fatigued state.

Remember that many of these exercises are progressions of the basic exercises, so you should not attempt them until you are ready.

4 - The X Factor

Even CrossFit haters admit that there is one thing that CrossFit does right. It's creating a dynamic environment that encourages members to test their limits.

For a long time, many people associated working out with either boredom or punishment. CrossFit has completely changed that relationship - so much so that people both within the ranks of CrossFitters and outsiders often refer to CrossFit as a cult.

But how many people do you know who can't wait to do their back and biceps day at the local gym? Sure, these people exist, but there are very few of them. CrossFit has grown entire groups of passionate members who live to work out with their training partners. They love a challenge.

When you feel like your coach and the training community supports your successes, you become more committed.

Even if you work out at a regular run-of-the-mill gym, chances are you'll see the same people there on a regular basis. Don't be afraid to take off your sound-absorbing headphones and cheer on the guy who's trying to break his personal deadlift record.

And when that karma comes back to you a few weeks later when you finally try to bench press 170 kilos, you'll be glad you made the effort to become more a part of your gym community.

Do what's valuable and ignore the rest

Is performing snatches with high reps a good idea when you're exhausted? Probably not. Is training multiple strength qualities the best way to prepare for a powerlifting competition? No.

But just because a system isn't perfect (and every training system has its limitations) doesn't mean it's completely worthless.

Take a closer look at CrossFit (or Westside, or Poliquin, or Boyle) and find out for yourself what you can use from this methodology to your advantage.

By Dan Trink | 04/08/13

Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/4-things-i-have-stolen-from-crossfit

Continue reading
The future of CrossFit
thumb

Here's a quick summary

  1. In the future, the smartest CrossFit competitive athletes will basically be Olympic weightlifters with excellent work capacity.
  2. CrossFit athletes should focus on strength. No one wins competitions with bodyweight exercises.
  3. CrossFitters should work on their strength and technique and keep their misses at 10% or below. The fewer misses you make, the more stable your technique will be under stressful conditions.
  4. They need to use the correct maximum weight when planning their weights. When planning your weights, you should start with a weight that you can do 7 or 8 times out of 10.
  5. CrossFitters should ditch your mindset that focuses on personal bests, you need to ditch scoreboards, AMARAPs and time caps.
  6. In the future, the best CrossFit athletes will be those who plan their workouts, push themselves hard at the right times, resist the urge to exceed their recovery capabilities and use supplements wisely.

CrossFit training is growing up

I work with a lot of advanced CrossFit competitors. In fact, these are the athletes I enjoy training the most. They work the hardest and, contrary to what most people believe, are the biggest overachievers when it comes to technique.

CrossFit is evolving as a sport and the training is slowly catching up. As you probably guessed correctly, the best competitors at the CrossFit Games don't just perform the daily WOD handed to them from CrossFit Headquarters.

To be good, you have to excel at the Olympic weightlifting exercises

No one wins with their bodyweight exercise skills. Even though being really bad at bodyweight exercises can prevent you from winning, even if you are excellent at those exercises, you won't win a flower pot if you are weak at the heavy exercises.

There have been a few CrossFit competitive athletes in the past who have done abnormally well in the deadlift and clean and jerk or snatch at 90 kilos or more, but today you have tons of girls doing 85 kilos or more in the snatch and 115 kilos or more in the deadlift and press.

As for men, there were once people who thought Froning was an alien because he could snatch 135 kilos, but today you can't even qualify for the CrossFit Games if you can't snatch at least 130 kilos. There are even some CrossFit athletes who can do 185 kilos on the deadlift and press!

Keep the following in mind:

  • There is always some form of ladder training that you can use to work your way up to super heavy weights at all major CrossFit competitions. In most cases, this is a variation of the Olympic weightlifting exercises.
  • Variations of the Olympic weightlifting exercises are being incorporated into more and more competition WODs and today much heavier weights are being used than in the past.
  • The competition is so close that every second counts. You need brilliant technique more than ever, as every failed repetition can mean dropping 2-3 places.

As a result, a large part of your training should be spent on the Olympic weightlifting exercises. For example, I have the athletes I work with train the Olympic weightlifting exercises two to three times a week and they also train these exercises on their own to a certain extent on one or two days.

Add to this the fact that many high level CrossFit competitive athletes were former elite weightlifters (Matt Fraser and Lauren Fisher, for example).

In fact, in a couple weeks I will be taking some of my CrossFit athletes to a weightlifting competition to qualify them for Nationals. Some of these should make it.

In the future, the smartest CrossFit competitors will basically be Olympic weightlifters with excellent work capacity, as they will be training a lot like high level weightlifters, plus doing metabolic conditioning and working on their technical skills. We will also see more and more athletes competing in both CrossFit Championships and Weightlifting Championships.

As far as Olympic weightlifting exercises are concerned, the following requirements are crucial:

1 - You must have excellent technique

The level of technique you see in elite competitors today is beyond anything you've seen in any other athlete - except perhaps weightlifters. Don't judge their technique based on what they do in competition WODs, because even Klokov and Ilyin would look like they are using poor technique if they were performing a competition WOD.

It's natural for technique to deteriorate in places during a competitive WOD. All well and good, but if you had poor technique to begin with, it would become terrible during a WOD! If, on the other hand, you have excellent technique, then you will maintain decent form even under time pressure.

2 - You must have an 'automatic' technique

The more stable your technique is, the less likely you are to fail to complete reps cleanly, which can cost you valuable time during a WOD. And the only way to achieve this kind of solid technique is to improve your strength skills. To achieve this, you need to train the exercises frequently with good form.

3 - You need to learn how to use your legs properly

CrossFit is "pull-dominant" when it comes to the lower body. Deadlifts, kettlebell swings and the like train the hip hinge mechanism and as a result this becomes the primary weightlifting strategy of CrossFit competitive athletes.

As a result, they often push the bar away from their body using their hips and lack precision when it comes to where the barbell lands. They need to learn to move the bar up from the floor close to their body using their legs and not their back.

And then they need to learn how to open up their torso as they move the bar up close to their thighs to get into a position where they can explode upward using their legs instead of forward with their hips.

The hip joint should mainly be used to get the bar in the right position to use the legs properly, but the thighs should be responsible for the actual explosive movement upwards.

4 - You need to work on technique and strength

You won't achieve this by using maximum weights every day or trying to set personal bests, which is common in CrossFit circles. In competitive weightlifting, everyone knows that you develop your quality of exercise execution (technique and strength) by doing a lot of volume with 75 to 85% of your 1RM weight.

Yes, it's important to use heavier weights than this, but most of your work should be done in the 75 to 85% range with sets of 3 reps.

You're probably thinking, "Yeah, but Bulgarian weightlifters go to their max every day!" or "Pat Mendes on YouTube always goes to his daily max."

Well, you are neither a Bulgarian weightlifter nor an advanced strength athlete. Once you have developed world-class technique and technical stability regardless of weight, then you can start talking about the Bulgarians. Until then, focus on what works to develop both technique and strength.

5 - You need to work on making fewer misses

Even in the field of weightlifting, this is a hotly debated topic. There's the "Bulgarian" school of thought, where a weightlifter attempts a maximum weight several times a week - and sometimes even every day. They allow a weightlifter up to 6 failed attempts at a given weight. If they don't make it after 6 attempts, they stop.

Then there are the Russian and Chinese schools, where it seems there is never - or very rarely - a miss during training.

I'm on the side of the second group. I used to belong to the first school of thought - I trained super heavy all the time and allowed myself up to 6 misses - and wasn't particularly good as a weightlifter. I was strong (280 kilos on squats, 220 kilos on front squats), but I had inconsistent technique.

If I had known then what I know now, I could have achieved a lot more. But being a bad weightlifter also helped me to become a good trainer.

So you should rarely make a mistake in training - especially during the development phase. Failures will probably happen, but you need to keep the number of failures to 10% or less.

The fewer misses you have, the more confidence you will have and the more stable your technique will be under stressful conditions.

6 - You must use the correct maximum weight when planning your weights

CrossFitters base everything on their personal records. This is a mistake for athletes who do not yet have a stable technique.

When planning your weights, you should start with a weight that you can do every week without any special preparation - a weight that you can do on at least seven to eight attempts out of ten.

7 - You need to drop the mindset that focuses on personal bests

When it comes to Olympic weightlifting exercises and basic strength exercises, everything seems to revolve around personal bests.

This is not surprising. It goes hand in hand with an obsession with achieving the best time, completing the most reps and being the fastest. Chasing personal bests is to weightlifting what WODs, where you go all out, are to metabolic conditioning.

You are preparing for a personal best. You train for it. You develop an optimal technique to perform your personal best efficiently. Chasing a personal best is like trying to learn by just taking tests.

A personal best should come naturally. With proper technique, there will come a point where your technique is so efficient and your muscles are so much stronger that a personal best will come naturally.

Trying to set personal bests when your technique is not stable is just plain stupid. If you can't maintain the same technique during these attempts as you do during your regular training, then you're not ready.

To be good you need to focus on strength development

How strong do you need to be? The answer to this question will always be "stronger than you are now". I don't see a limit when it comes to how strong you should get if you want to compete in CrossFit competitions.

Of course, you won't get as strong as the top powerlifters who specialize exclusively in strength, but you should try to get as strong as you can get. To be a strong CrossFit competitor you should be able to move 70% of the maximum weights of raw powerlifters.

For example, let's take the average CrossFit competitor who weighs between 88 and 92 kilos. The raw powerlifting records in the 90 kilo weight class are as follows:

  • 341 kilo squat by Jesse Norris
  • 257 kilo bench press by Larry Danaher
  • 395 kilo deadlift by Andrey Belyaev

So an elite CrossFit competitor should be able to lift something along the lines of 238 kilos for squats, 180 kilos for bench presses and 277 kilos for deadlifts.

Based on these weights, we can also estimate the weights for some other exercises:

  • Front squats: 175 kilos
  • Standing shoulder press: 107 kilos
  • Push press: 138 kilos

Do all high level CrossFit athletes have elite strength levels? No. And not all of them have a balanced strength distribution, but these are good goals to aim for. If you achieve them, then your strength will never be a limiting factor for anything you do during your training or during a competition.

Still, we have to ask ourselves the obvious question: Why do CrossFit competitive athletes need to be so strong?

  1. Competition WODs include more and more heavy exercises.
  2. The stronger you are, the proportionally easier the WODs will be for you.

Performing 20 repetitions of deadlifts at 125 kilos is much easier if your maximum weight is 250 kilos than if it is 150 kilos.

The stronger you are, the greater your potential in Olympic weightlifting exercises

Being strong is no guarantee of achieving good results in the Olympic weightlifting exercises. I know a lot of guys who can deadlift almost 275 kilos but can't snatch more than 100 kilos.

However, if you have a high reserve of strength, this will allow you to achieve better results once you have mastered the technique of Olympic weightlifting.

Another factor is that you won't develop elite strength levels just by performing WODs. And even if you train the Olympic weightlifting exercises often, they alone will not develop elite strength. To get strong, you need to do strength training!

Karim El Hlimi and Roch Proteau - who competed in the CrossFit Games - are two excellent CrossFit coaches I work with and they schedule strength training 3 to 4 days a week. They don't use a particularly high volume because CrossFit athletes already spend a lot of time doing other things like technique training and metabolic conditioning.

They usually perform 1 or 2 strength exercises per training session. If they do two, they do it in an alternating fashion. And they usually perform 4 to 6 sets.

My athletes will do 1 to 2 strength exercises after their Olympic weightlifting workouts. We usually focus on front squats and deadlifts or snatch deadlifts, but if someone has very unbalanced strength levels, then that person should probably put more energy into improving their weak points.

To be good, you have to give up a few things

The root of most of the problems associated with CrossFit are related to the scoreboard or scoreboard mentality. Sadly, this is one of the things that made CrossFit great.

A training session is designed to build your body, your skills and your physical capacity, not to test yourself. Can you improve by testing yourself in the gym? Sure! But if you do this all the time, you'll increase your risk of injury, overstretch your recovery abilities and hit a wall pretty soon in terms of your progress.

Training should be demanding, but it must remain within your recovery capacities, otherwise you will have problems and positive adaptations will turn into negative adaptations (stagnation or even regression).

Roch Proteau, who has participated in the CrossFit Games both as an individual athlete and as a team athlete and who trains a large number of competitors at a high level, told me that his athletes usually train at around 8/10 or even just 7/10 on the perceived exertion scale.

They occasionally go up to 9/10, which is close to their limit, but not to a point where their technique starts to deteriorate.

His athletes are given a workload to complete. If it's a WOD, they have to do it fast, but there's no time limit and the emphasis is not on getting the best time, but on doing the exercises as well as possible while challenging the right energy system.

There is no scoreboard in his studio where athletes write down their WOD points.

Ignore the scoreboard!

The scoreboard is a big reason why CrossFit has become so popular: people like to compare themselves to others and impress others.

Some get an extra boost of motivation from knowing that others will see what they have done. They don't want to look bad, so they work extra hard to achieve a good time. The scoreboard also gives people the feeling that they are competitive athletes, which is something that attracts a lot of people.

But what started out as a good thing in theory has led to more problems than benefits.

If there's a scoreboard, then everyone can see what you've done and how you compare to others. You will therefore tend to train as quickly as possible - often at the expense of effectiveness and safe technique.

When the main goal is to be fast, people tend to take "technical shortcuts". Even at the CrossFit Games, you won't always see perfect technique, but that's okay - it's a competition after all.

Criticizing an athlete at the CrossFit Games for their technique on power cleans during a competitive WOD is the same as criticizing an NFL running back for not showing perfect sprint mechanics during a run.

The first step is to get rid of the scoreboard. Then you have to change your mentality. When you're in the gym, you're training, not competing. No athlete in the world trains with the same intensity as they do during a competition.

You can have a short training phase during which you give it your all. Usually 2 or 3 weeks in a 12 week cycle should be weeks where you go all out (not always back-to-back), but 9 to 10 of those weeks should be used to improve your physical capacity and skills. Focus on quality.

By going all out all the time, you not only risk injury and developing bad motor habits, but you also increase the risk of exceeding your recovery capacity. And if this happens, your performance, motivation and well-being will suffer.

No AMRAPs

For the same reasons, I believe that AMRAPs (As Many Reps/Rounds As Possible) should be avoided within a given period of time during regular training and only used if you want to test yourself.

AMRAPs have the same effect as a scoreboard. They will make you focus on your "points" rather than on the best possible training effect and the quality of exercise execution.

To be good, you need to supplement wisely

I've spent a lot of time in CrossFit gyms and one thing that always fascinates me is the amount of supplement doses these athletes carry around in their training bags. This is especially true for competitive athletes who are desperate for an edge over the competition.

Sadly, most are using supplements that are ineffective (especially in terms of their specific goal) or suboptimal, if not counterproductive. CrossFit athletes seem to have fallen in love with their pre-WOD formula. They use formulas that are rich in stimulants and hope that these will give them an edge during their WODs.

I have nothing against the occasional use of stimulants. However, I prefer to use supplements that affect the nervous system in a more precise way - increasing or improving focus, confidence, coordination, etc.

Pure stimulants like energy drinks should be used as an occasional tool when you are lacking energy. They should not be part of your daily program.

Instead of focusing on getting high, CrossFitters need to focus on actual training nutrition.

Training nutrition to maximize recovery

Optimizing your nutrition before, during and after training is the most important thing you can do to maximize your gains.

Having the right nutrients in your body when you train will maximize the transport of nutrients to the muscles that are actually being stimulated. Not only will this increase your gains, but it will also help your body recover much faster after training, which will allow you to train harder and more often.

A big problem with CrossFit training is that people tend to push the limits of their body's ability to recover. This is especially true for competitive athletes who need to maximize many different physical capacities and abilities.

If you take the right nutrients before, during and after training in the form of smart supplementation, you will recover faster and be able to handle a higher training load without suffering from a decline in performance.

If you can train more and harder without exceeding your recovery capacity, you will make faster progress.

Supplements are there to address a specific problem. Don't let yourself be emotionally seduced, let yourself be intellectually convinced.

An evolving sport

In a nutshell, here are the keys to becoming a good CrossFit athlete:

  1. Be good at the Olympic weightlifting exercises. You can do this by training like a weightlifter instead of performing the exercises during a WOD.
  2. Be strong.
  3. Forget the scoreboard. Training is not a test.
  4. Supplement wisely. Focus on your training nutrition
  5. Have solid bodyweight exercise skills.
  6. Have good basic aerobic capacity.
  7. Have very high anaerobic capacity and power.
  8. Develop physical capacity without the need for a strong athletic ability component. Want to build strength? Train heavy with the big basic exercises. Want to improve your anaerobic capacity? Work hard with the weight sled, farmer's walks, rowing ergometer or airdyne bike.
  9. Do more general training the further away your competition is. This means that you should focus on training the basic capacities (strength, aerobic capacity, anaerobic capacity) and skills (weightlifting exercises and bodyweight exercises) for yourself and try to get them to the highest possible level.

As you approach your competition, you will start to incorporate more specific training into your training program. This means combining different elements in the form of complexes.

Initially this may mean performing supersets/complexes of strength exercises with an athletic skill or performing a complex of a strength exercise and an athletic skill exercise together with a metabolic conditioning exercise.

In the future, the best athletes will be the athletes who train like athletes - who plan their training correctly, push themselves hard when it's time, resist the urge to exceed their recovery capacity (fatigue masks fitness) and use supplements intelligently.

By Christian Thibaudeau

Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/future-of-crossfit-training

Continue reading
The beautiful, ugly truth about taking part in competitions
thumb

Here is a short summary

  1. Going on stage can boost your confidence. However, if you get too caught up in it, it will make you ego-obsessed.
  2. Competing can improve your skills in the gym and in the kitchen, but it will make certain competitive athletes dumber and more dependent.
  3. Competitive culture celebrates serious training and serious nutrition. This worldview encourages community building - but some of these views are stupid.
  4. The pressure of competition can push you to exceed your expectations, but it can also push you to do things that can be detrimental to your metabolism and body image.
  5. There are prizes you can win that are far more important than titles and trophies.

Should you compete?

A woman who transforms her body with the help of heavy iron will at some point ask herself the following question: Do I have what it takes to compete?

The answer is yes, you have what it takes. The more important question, however, is whether it's worth it.

If you are toying with the idea of taking part in a competition, then we should clarify the details. Let's talk about what you won't hear from competition coaches.

Here are the four most important factors regarding bodybuilding and figure class competitions that you should consider before entering a competition.

1 - Entering a competition

The good things

With the right mindset, preparing for a competition can be a tool for personal development. Just as when you speak or perform in public, you are forced to take some risks when you perform on the competition stage, which can help you boost your confidence.

You open yourself up to criticism from others and if you are mentally strong enough, you will be able to deal with your perceived mistakes, be proud of your progress and say to the world "look at the result of my hard work!"

And when you have done all this, then in any other situation you can say to yourself "this is a small thing compared to walking out onto a competition stage almost naked. If I can do that, then I can do this."

Preparing for your performance can give you a real boost of confidence. You need to be encouraged by your progress, of course, otherwise you won't feel the urge to sign up for a competition in the first place.

When you go on stage, you are basically making a statement that you have adequate body development and want to show it off. This is a bold move if you've never done anything like this before and in order to live an interesting life, you need these kinds of experiences that push you to your limits mentally and physically.

You can't be a wallflower and a competitive athlete at the same time. These two things are mutually exclusive.

All the preparation for a competition will make you ruthlessly aware that you will end up in front of a crowd and if you lack the confidence to do this, pretending to have it will work just as well. Faking confidence develops your confidence.

The bad things

Taking part in a competition means that you are having your appearance judged in public. Competing is all about paying a few judges to compare your body to the bodies of other women. You are paying to be judged.

If you take this idea first and let it become your world, you will end up becoming dependent on validation from others. You will need other people to constantly validate you in order to feel good about your appearance.

When you sign up for a subjective, appearance-based competition, you train yourself to worry about what others think of you. Of course, this is unavoidable to a certain extent in everyday life. We care what other people think about us because we are not sociopaths. We like to be attractive and it's natural to want recognition for the work we put in at the gym.

But if you fail to see the bigger picture and look at yourself as a whole person - not just a beautiful body - then dependence on validation from others will run amok. Your self-esteem will deteriorate when your looks become more important than your talent, intellect, passion, creativity, integrity and kindness.

If your identity only revolves around the approval you receive for your looks, you will become both narcissistic and insecure. This may seem like a contradiction, but it's not.

If you're not happy with yourself on any given morning, you'll be desperate for the opinions of others to validate you and improve your mood (insecurity). And if you're happy with yourself, you'll be eager for feedback from others on how good you look (narcissism).

The internet is full of competitive athletes who depend on "likes" and "favorites" and validation from others because these people can't validate themselves.

This is proof that it doesn't matter how spectacular your body looks. You can be a professional and an insecure narcissist at the same time. Getting more approval will not make you less addicted to approval. The whole thing is comparable to an addiction.

Does taking part in competitions have these consequences for everyone? Of course not. But you need to have a very solid body image of yourself from the start.

You need to love what your body can do - not just what it looks like. And you need to know that the opinions of others (positive or negative) don't really mean anything. Opinions don't reflect the value of you as a person.

Don't enter a competition because you think it will give you more confidence - it might not. Sign up because you are healthy on a daily basis. Enter because you are mastering your training and mastering your body in the gym.

2 - The competition preparation

The good things

You learn. You grow. You're training and eating more mindfully because everything serves a purpose to make you look phenomenal when you perform on the competition stage.

There is nothing like it. All aspects of your lifestyle become methodical - from your bedtime to your caffeine intake, from your meal timing to your bowel movements.

There is a plan and a compelling reason to stick to it. If you're tempted to throw caution to the wind, all you have to do is visualize how your race will go or how you want to look when you step onto the competition stage.

This conscientiousness about training and nutrition leads to self-awareness. You start to think like a machine instead of letting your feelings guide you when it comes to whether you train or eat healthily.

You will recognize how your body responds to continuous hard work. You will learn lessons that you will never learn if you don't test your limits to be ready on a certain date in the calendar.

Participating in a competition will make you look beyond the basics of sensible nutrition and training and you will begin to examine all the minute details. Healthy behaviors become strategic behaviors and many of these are things you will learn to love and use long after the competition is over.

The bad things

Some competitors learn nothing. There are two types:

The first type is a woman who is out of shape and believes that she will maintain the body she will achieve over the course of her competition preparation forever.

This couldn't be further from reality. Women who rely on trainers to overhaul their lives are the women who will never learn how to get fit on their own.

Signing up for a competition is the wrong way to get in shape if you're completely out of shape. Why? Because following someone else's instructions to prepare for a competition is an artificial situation. It doesn't teach you how to integrate fitness into your daily life.

It only teaches you how to make your fitness someone else's responsibility.

And no matter how good your coach's nutrition plan or training sessions are, if you can't integrate healthy eating or training into your life after the competition, you'll go back to your previous lifestyle.

The second type who won't learn anything is the woman who is already fit but hires a bad coach

Many trainers will insist that you stick to their every word and are completely dependent on them. They want you to blindly follow their instructions without thinking critically about your long-term health or metabolism.

These trainers want you to continue to need them and keep paying them so that it makes them look good when you win a trophy.

This can even be dangerous if they starve you too much, push you to use illegal substances and tell you to do two hours of cardio every day.

Sure, you might look perfect on race day, but your body will be a wreck afterwards and you won't know how to eat right. What's the point of this?

I can't tell you how many women have contacted me after working with a race prep coach to tell me they don't know how to eat.

Don't become one of those women. If you can't think for yourself during race prep, then you won't know when it's over.

Don't pay to be someone else's bitch and don't pay them to make you dumber. If your trainer is a dictator who tells you things that sound idiotic, run.

Learn for yourself how to get fit before you hand over the reins to a competition coach. Of course, it's even better if you get so fit that you wouldn't dream of handing over the reins to someone else.

3 - The culture

The good things

When you take training and nutrition seriously, it's refreshing to meet competitive athletes and other people who feel the same way - especially if you're usually surrounded by people who don't understand.

If people in your social circle, at work and in your family are not interested in nutrition and training, then it can become a burden to always have to defend yourself and explain your lifestyle.

It's frustrating to have people around you who don't understand why you, as a woman, want to build muscle in the first place. Or those who don't understand your food choices and assume that giving up cake and pizza is an eating disorder.

When you finally have other people with a fitness mindset around you, it's a relief. You can share your excitement with others, you can talk shop about training and you can pull a protein shake out of your handbag without batting an eyelid.

It's nice to have other people around you who get satisfaction from working their asses off on training and nutrition. It's fun to share ideas and tips with others. People simply want to be in the presence of those who understand what they are doing and why they are doing it.

It's just not fun to be criticized by those who don't take care of their bodies.

These shared values are a benefit of the bodybuilding culture. Nobody asks you why you train on the weekend instead of partying. We understand it. We support it. And we are with you.

The bad things

There's one part of bodybuilding culture that doesn't make much sense: the do anything to win mentality.

This mentality glorifies an unbalanced lifestyle. It says that everything else in your life has to go to hell or else you're just not "hardcore" enough.

This may be necessary in some respects for a handful of top pros out there, but certainly not for the thousands of ordinary competitive athletes.

If your competition preparation has you doing things that upset your family life, your finances or your long-term health, then you're a loser...no matter how many trophies you collect.

When you go on stage, your goal is to look like the epitome of fitness, but being fit should enhance your life - not distract you from what's important.

Oh yeah, you think competing is going to get you a career with money and fame? Sorry. There is only one Arnold Schwarzenegger. And nobody outside the bodybuilding world knows who the hell any of the other top competitive athletes are.

You're not going to make any money from competitions like this. You pay for them. You invest time, energy and money. A lot of money (competing in an amateur championship last year cost me over 3000 dollars). If competing ruins the rest of your life, then that investment is not worth the money.

There are stories of people who have lost their jobs, their partners and their bank accounts because of their obsession with competing. All for the sake of coming third in a local competition. But it doesn't have to be that way.

4 - The mentality

The good things

The pressure of competition preparation will teach you that you are capable of more than you think.

Whenever you ask yourself the question "Do I have what it takes to do this?" you will want to know the answer. And those who take action seek the pressure that comes with finding out. They test their courage.

Do I have what it takes to force five more repetitions? Can I still run as fast as I did as a teenager? Can I build bigger shoulder muscles? Can I cycle my carbs without needing my trainer to babysit? Can I stand in front of an audience and exude confidence?

You won't know the answers to these questions until you try it. People who never ask themselves what they are capable of will never find out. If you try things, you are more likely to try other things.

You will become addicted to finding out what you are made of. You will learn through trial and error. You will become less dependent on coaches telling you what to do. You will become encouraged and unstoppable.

The bad things

Competing can make you feel inadequate. Even if you've made tremendous progress, a competitive mentality can be a nagging reminder of your perceived weaknesses and failures. Your abs could be harder, your legs could be leaner and your shoulder muscles could be bigger.

Being aware of these tendencies can help you block them out. But if you let them run amok, not only will you be continually dissatisfied, but you may also consider using banned substances.

I chose to be a steroid-free athlete, but there are competitive athletes who use banned substances - even when they are preparing for their first competition.

I was so vulnerable and desperate to be better that I actually considered this before my husband set me straight.

And this was just an amateur competition. So you can imagine what it's like at national or professional level.... I'm not condemning the competitors who use banned substances. They work their asses off in training too, but I will never take competitions that seriously. There are too many risks and I like my body too much.

What if your metabolism stops working properly because your body has become addicted to illegal fat burners? Will your body still look as phenomenal later on without the help of T3?

Using banned substances has too much potential to mentally mess up your body image if you are unable to achieve the necessary muscle mass or definition without the extra support.

What woman wants to become dependent on illegal substances to maintain her slimness? We should pity any woman who has made the mistake of messing up her body and body image just to compete.

Will I do it again?

Even if there were no prizes to win, no judges to impress and no competition stage to stride onto, I would still continue to train hard and eat consciously.

Yes, I will continue to compete, but probably not with the same federation.

And this time I will focus more on learning new things and having fun than worrying about pleasing the judges.

Self-affirmation, autonomy and a fit body - these are the trophies that every woman can be proud of. And these trophies are worth more than the trophies you win on stage.

By Dani Shugart

Source:https://www.t-nation.com/powerful-words/beautiful-ugly-truth-about-competing

Continue reading