Training

Key information:
- An unloading phase is a temporary reduction in weekly training load to give your body and mind a break from hard training.
- To unload correctly, you should use the same weights as during your hard training phase, but perform 30 to 50% fewer sets per week and 2 to 4 repetitions less per set.
- If you have just started training, then you should unload every 8 to 10 weeks. If you've been training for more than three years, then you should unload every 4 to 6 weeks.
In many ways, building your body is a lot like building anything else - the more you put in, the more you'll get...at least up to a certain point.
You need to train hard to build the body you want, but you can't just rely on your afterburners.
Challenge your body week after week with no breaks or unloading periods, and your journey will be slowed by the following obstacles:
- Regular plateaus
- Overuse injuries
- Lack of motivation
- Half-hearted training sessions
This is the reason that top level athletes of all disciplines from field hockey players to cyclists to powerlifters incorporate regularly scheduled periods of rest and recovery into their training.
In fact, the best athletes place tremendous emphasis on this because the consequences of overlooking it are so severe (chronic poor performance, career-ending injuries and more).
When it comes to building muscle and strength, unloading periods are one of the best recovery tools at your disposal.
You've probably heard about unloading phases before, but you're probably not sure why they're used, how to do them correctly and how often you should use them.
Look around the internet for answers and you will find many conflicting opinions:
- Some will say that de-stressing periods are a waste of time, while others will say that you should just give yourself a week off instead.
- Some will say that you should unload by reducing your weekly sets and weights, while others will say that you should just reduce the number of sets you do each week.
- Some will say that you should unload whenever you feel it's necessary, while others will say that you should plan your unloading periods in advance. Who is right?
The short answer is that if you follow a well-planned training program, unloading periods are an effective way to prevent injuries, plateaus and burnout.
To do this, these off-load phases must be planned and executed correctly, otherwise they will either not help to adequately promote your recovery or may even be a complete waste of time.
In this article, we will therefore take a closer look at this,
- What an off-load phase is
- Why so many people don't benefit from off-load periods
- How often you should discharge
- When you should discharge and when you should give yourself a break
- What a proper discharge phase should look like
- And more...
Let's start with the first point.
What is a discharge phase?
An off-load phase is a temporary reduction in weekly training stress to give your body and mind a break from hard training.
By stress, I mean the general mental and physical strain and exhaustion caused by heavy training, as well as the microscopic damage to your muscles and joints.
By alleviating these stressors, you can reduce overuse of joints and ligaments and reduce the risk of injury or burnout. Unloading also reduces the demands placed on your muscles, but this is not as important as the former. There are a number of adjustments you can make to reduce training stress:
- Reducing intensity (weight moved)
- Reducing the volume (number of sets or repetitions performed)
For example, if your training program consists of 5 training sessions of 70 to 80 heavy repetitions (75 to 85% of your 1RM weight), an unload phase could reduce the intensity to 50 to 60% of your 1RM weight or the volume to 35 to 40 heavy repetitions per training session.
Typically, unloading phases are scheduled after a phase of progressively more intense training.
For example, it is common in strength training programs to increase training intensity and/or volume week after week to promote gains in strength and muscle mass, and then after three or four weeks of these progressive increases, schedule a one-week unloading phase to allow your body to prepare for the next round.
Unload periods typically last a week, although some exercisers use longer or shorter unload periods depending on their training plans and goals.
If you are training particularly hard or have been training for a long time without unloading, then a full week may be appropriate. On the other hand, if you're not training that hard or have only recently unloaded, then a few days may be enough to do the job.
Another way to give your body a break is to take a complete break from resistance training. This works, of course, but if you take too many days off, your technique and desire to get back into heavy training can suffer.
I generally recommend an unloading phase rather than a complete break from training, but sometimes it can make more sense to take a complete break from training with weights.
For example, if you're traveling and have limited access to training equipment, it's often better to take a full break and enjoy your free time rather than stressing about finding a time and place to train.
Summary: A de-stress phase is a temporary reduction in training stress to give your body and mind a break from heavy training. Such a phase usually lasts a week and is scheduled in advance.
Why do exercisers unload?
The basic theory of detraining is based on research into how our bodies deal with physical stress
Scientists are still arguing about what is the best way to describe this process, but there is a trend (1):
- Add a stressor (exercise)
- Remove the stressor (rest and recovery)
- Adapt to cope better with the next stressor
In other words, you stress the body in a certain way, allow it to recover from the stress and it will become better at coping with that stressor in the future.
The third step - adaptation - is technically known as supercompensation and allows you to build muscle, increase your strength, increase your speed, improve your skills and coordination, etc.
Like maintaining good sleep hygiene and energy balance, unloading is a tool that falls into category #2 above - rest and recovery - and its purpose is to help with step #3 - supercompensation.
This cycle repeats itself in the short term and long term - both between training sessions and over weeks and months of training.
For example, after a training session, your muscles are exhausted and slightly damaged and if you provide them with enough calories, protein, sleep and rest, they will recover and regenerate and be ready for another training session a few days later.
If this is the case, then why do we need to unload at all? Wouldn't the body's ability to repair itself keep up with the stress and damage caused by training?
The answer is - not really.
Different parts of the body heal faster than others. Your central nervous system recovers from a heavy training session within hours and your muscles are repaired within a few days.
However, some tissue types of the body such as tendons, ligaments, joints and bones take longer to heal (2).
If you regularly move heavy weights, these tissues suffer tiny microfractures and tears and if you don't allow them to heal sufficiently, this damage can lead to strains, tears and injuries over time (3, 4).
By unloading regularly, you give your body the chance to release different types of localized stress that accumulate over weeks of hard training. You can think of it as an insurance policy against injury and overtraining.
Another reason that exercisers unload is that it allows them to do more productive workouts.
If you train for weeks and months without a break, you won't be able to maximize your performance in the long run. Eventually you will reach a point where you are only recovering enough to repeat the same workouts over and over again, also known as plateauing.
This is why unloading is one of the best ways to prevent or even break plateaus in your muscle and strength gains. The extra rest and recovery will allow you to start training blocks fresh and powerful and be able to move more weight and complete a higher training volume.
Simply put, you'll be better off with a month or two of hard training followed by an off-load period and another month or two of hard training than four months of hard continuous training.
Summary: The primary reason that exercisers unload is to improve their recovery, reduce their risk of injury and improve their motivation and ability to train hard.
Why will many exercisers not benefit from unloading training sessions?
The amount of rest and recovery the body needs depends on the level of stress you put it under.
Something significant like several weeks or months of hard training with progressive overload should be followed by additional rest and recovery such as an unload.
Something much lighter like a half-hearted, barely sweaty workout, which we see in many exercisers, does not require special periods of additional recovery. That's why some well-known people in the fitness industry talk disparagingly about unloading - in fact, many people don't train hard enough to need it.
They just show up at the gym, go through the motions, don't log their workouts and therefore don't strive to surpass their performance from previous workouts, and they don't properly control their diet to support their fitness goals.
Unloading has nothing to offer these guys and gals.
The key to improving body composition and performance over time is to regularly push your body a little further beyond its limits and then back off a little.
If you're not following a well-planned training program that revolves around progressive overload, or if you're not pushing yourself hard enough in the gym to make progress, then you have no reason to unload.
However, if you are following such a program and working hard to improve your performance, then you can benefit from unloading and should incorporate unloading periods into your training program.
In fact, I would say that a training program that does not include or require unloading periods is probably suboptimal at best and ineffective at worst.
Summary: You will not benefit from unloading periods unless you follow a sensibly designed, challenging training program that forces you to get stronger over time. However, if you do follow such a program, then you will benefit from unloading periods.
How often should you unload?
There is no universal, one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as some bodies can tolerate more than others.
In addition, the ideal frequency of unloading will depend on the following factors:
- How strong you are. Stronger exercisers tend to need more frequent unloads to recover from their heavier workouts.
- How long you have been training. Beginners need fewer unloads because they are not yet strong enough to push their bodies to the degree that more experienced exercisers can push their bodies.
- How resilient your joints, tendons and ligaments are. Pain in the joints, tendons and ligaments is a reliable indicator that you need a de-stressing phase.
However, there are a few effective rules of thumb:
- If you're new to training with weights, schedule a de-loading week every 8 to 10 weeks of heavy and intense training. If you are in a calorie deficit, you should reduce these periods to 6 to 8 weeks (and yes, you should continue to train heavy even during a calorie deficit).
- If you have been training with weights for 1 to 3 years, you should plan a de-loading week after 6 to 8 weeks of heavy, intense training with weights. Reduce this to every 4 to 6 weeks if you are in a calorie deficit.
- If you have been training with weights for 3 to 6 years, you should plan a de-loading week after 4 to 6 weeks of heavy, intensive training with weights. Use the same unloading frequency if you are in a calorie deficit.
- I would not recommend doing more than 12 weeks of hard training without unloading at least once. In my experience, there is little progress to be made by training longer than this without a break, otherwise the risk of significant disadvantages increases.
- If you never feel the need to unload, then your training program is probably too light.
If you are new to de-loading, I would recommend that you plan a de-loading week in advance and stick to it no matter how you feel. This will ensure that you don't inadvertently increase your risk of injury or overtraining by stubbornly refusing to come off the gas.
Once you've learned more about how your body responds to training, you can take it a little easier with your off-load timing. You'll start to recognize when you need an off-load phase - your progress stalls, your body aches, your motivation to train wanes, your workouts feel much harder than they should, etc. - and you can respond accordingly.
For example, my current training program involves a lot of heavy training with weights and my sleep leaves a lot to be desired for various reasons, which is why I feel the need for an unloading phase every 4 to 5 weeks. Once this happens, I train hard for another week and then unload.
Summary: I recommend unloading every 4 to 10 weeks depending on how long you've been training and how you train. As a general rule, people with more training experience who train intensively need more frequent unloading phases than people who train for less time or train more within their comfort zone.
In the second part of this article, I will go into more detail about what a correctly executed unloading phase should look like and answer a few more questions about unloading.
Source: https://legionathletics.com/deload-week/
By Michael Matthews

Are you interested in giving German Volume Training a try? Here's what exercisers often say about this training system:
- "German weightlifters have used it to move up a weight class."
- "Canadian weightlifter and gold medalist Jacques Demers used it to build up his legs, which resemble tree trunks."
- "It was the hypertrophy method of choice of bodybuilding guru Vince Gironda." All that sounds really good, doesn't it? Wait, not so fast.
The reputation of German Volume Training
Few training approaches in history are as well known as German Volume Training. It's been used for almost 50 years, it has almost mythical status and few people question its effectiveness.
All the dramatic anecdotes may have something to do with its popularity. Its simplicity and mathematical elegance could also have an impact on our perception of this system.
But while few people question the effectiveness of this training system, I've rarely seen it live up to its hype.
Even though I hate performing training a la German Volume Training, I have recommended it in the past and even developed my own variation 20 years ago, which I called Optimized German Volume Training. Back then, however, I didn't have the experience I have now.
Let's look at German Volume Training in a little more detail to see if it's good for you.
What is German Volume Training?
German Volume Training is first and foremost a load pattern.
You perform 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 60 to 120 seconds rest between sets using 60% of your maximum weight for one repetition. With 60% of your 1RM weight you would normally be able to perform 15 to 20 repetitions. However, as cumulative fatigue occurs, the last three sets will be very hard.
Charles Poliquin has added the antagonistic pairing to German Volume Training.
In his variation, you perform 10 sets of 10 repetitions with two exercises per training session. This would look like an A1/A2 format:
- Perform one set of exercise A1.
- Pause for 60 to 75 seconds.
- Perform one set of exercise A2.
- Pause for 60 to 75 seconds.
- Return to exercise A1
The cornerstone of every training session is two antagonistic exercises, each of which you perform 10 sets of 10 repetitions.
In the Poliquin version, two supporting exercises (B1/B2) are added, of which 3 sets of 10 to 12 repetitions each are performed.
The training split would look something like this:
- Chest and back
- Quadriceps and hamstrings
- Biceps and triceps
- Shoulders and rear shoulder muscles
Charles Poliquin has also added a tempo variable.
You perform each set using a 3020 or 4010 tempo - you lower the weight slowly and move it back up quickly(er) without pausing at the lowest point of the movement. One set of 10 repetitions would therefore correspond to 50 seconds of time under tension. These are the characteristics of modern German Volume Training. In reality, however, we always speak of German Volume Training when we talk about 10 sets of 10 repetitions with short pause intervals.
German Volume Training in theory
The theory is that you stimulate more muscle growth by accumulating a massive amount of fatigue. You achieve the accumulation of fatigue through the high volume, more time under tension per set and incomplete rest intervals.
You gradually build up more muscle fiber fatigue by performing the same movement over and over again so that the effort on the last sets becomes very high. It sounds simple and logically appealing, but does it work in practice?
German Volume Training from a scientific perspective: two studies
Let's take a look at some scientific studies that have investigated a 10 x 10 training approach. The first study by Amirthalingam et al. compared 6 weeks of training with 10 sets of 10 repetitions with performing only 5 sets. They used a 3-day training split and mainly multi-joint exercises (1).
After 6 weeks, the group that performed 5 sets had built significantly more muscle mass and strength than the group that performed 10 sets. Of course, the 10-set group had also built up mass and strength - but less than the 5-set group.
In another study, scientists compared the performance of 5 sets of 10 repetitions with the performance of 10 sets of 10 repetitions. Both groups used 60 to 80% of their 1RM weight over a 12-week period, and the researchers observed no significant differences between the two groups (2).
The German Volume group even began to lose muscle mass in the lower body between weeks 6 and 12. In terms of gains in muscle mass and strength, the 5-set group appeared to achieve better results, but the differences were not significant. At best, this study shows that 10 sets are no better than 5 (and if you have to do twice as much work to get the same results, this is an inferior program).
A different approach
Let's look at this from the perspective of the "maximally effective repetitions" approach developed by Chris Beardsley.
What are maximally effective repetitions? Repetitions where you recruit and stimulate as many muscle fibers as possible, focusing primarily on the fast contracting muscle fibers that have the greatest growth potential.
I wrote back in 2007 in my book "High-Threshold Muscle Building" that recruiting and stimulating the fast-twitch muscle fibers is the key to stimulating muscle growth. This is because these fibers have the greatest hypertrophy potential.
You recruit all recruitable fast-twitch muscle fibers when you need to produce about 80% of your maximum force potential at that moment. The misinterpretation is that you need to be at least 80% of your maximum weight for one repetition on the bar. If you exhaust your muscles during a set, the weight on the bar, even if it is lighter, can still represent 80% of your strength potential or more.
You will achieve a 2 to 4% reduction in your performance during a set of 2 to 20 repetitions per repetition. The lighter the weight, the less your performance will decrease from set to set.
For example, if you have 70% of your 1RM weight on the bar, by repetition 4 or 5 the weight will represent more than 80% of the weight you can move at that moment and from that point on you will recruit and stimulate the fast contracting fibers.
It's all about accumulating the maximum effective repetitions. The right amount will stimulate maximum growth, while too few will lead to inferior results and too many will make it difficult for you to recover from the workout, which can also lead to smaller gains. And if you need too many less effective reps to achieve those maximum effective reps, the increase in cortisol release resulting from the volume can negate much of the gains you are stimulating.
Maximum effective repetitions vs. German Volume Training a la Poliquin
In the Poliquin version of German Volume Training, you use 60% of your maximum weight for one repetition. The key element of German Volume Training is that you accumulate fatigue from set to set due to insufficient recovery between sets. The result of this is that the last sets tend to be very hard. The first three or four sets are easy and sets 5 to 7 are averagely hard.
Basically, you build up the cumulative fatigue of 2 to 2.5% from set to set. You can see how I came up with this in the tables below. These tables show you what each set looks like:
Set 1
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in capacity |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
0% |
60% |
|
2 |
60% |
2% |
62% |
|
3 |
60% |
4% |
64% |
|
4 |
60% |
6% |
66% |
|
5 |
60% |
8% |
68% |
|
6 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
7 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
8 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
9 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
10 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
Set 2
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in capacity |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
2% |
62% |
|
2 |
60% |
4% |
64% |
|
3 |
60% |
6% |
66% |
|
4 |
60% |
8% |
68% |
|
5 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
6 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
7 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
8 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
9 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
10 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
Set 3
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
4% |
64% |
|
2 |
60% |
6% |
66% |
|
3 |
60% |
8% |
68% |
|
4 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
5 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
6 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
7 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
8 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
9 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
10 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
Set 4
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
6% |
66% |
|
2 |
60% |
8% |
68% |
|
3 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
4 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
5 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
6 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
7 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
8 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
9 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
10 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
Set 5
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
8% |
68% |
|
2 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
3 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
4 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
5 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
6 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
7 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
8 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
9 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
10 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
Set 6
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
10% |
70% |
|
2 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
3 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
4 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
5 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
6 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
7 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
8 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
9 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
|
10 |
60% |
28% |
88% |
Set 7
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
12% |
72% |
|
2 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
3 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
4 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
5 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
6 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
7 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
8 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
|
9 |
60% |
28% |
88% |
|
10 |
60% |
30% |
90% |
Set 8
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
14% |
74% |
|
2 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
3 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
4 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
5 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
6 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
7 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
|
8 |
60% |
28% |
88% |
|
9 |
60% |
30% |
90% |
|
10 |
60% |
32% |
92% |
Set 9
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
16% |
76% |
|
2 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
3 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
4 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
5 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
6 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
|
7 |
60% |
28% |
88% |
|
8 |
60% |
30% |
90% |
|
9 |
60% |
32% |
92% |
|
10 |
60% |
34% |
94% |
Set 10
|
Weight |
Exhaustion/decrease in performance |
Current capacity |
|
|
1 |
60% |
18% |
78% |
|
2 |
60% |
20% |
80% |
|
3 |
60% |
22% |
82% |
|
4 |
60% |
24% |
84% |
|
5 |
60% |
26% |
86% |
|
6 |
60% |
28% |
88% |
|
7 |
60% |
30% |
90% |
|
8 |
60% |
32% |
92% |
|
9 |
60% |
34% |
94% |
|
10 |
60% |
36% |
96% |
These tables show quite clearly how each set gets progressively heavier and heavier and how, in turn, more repetitions become maximally effective.
If we look at the number of maximum effective repetitions per set, we get the following result:
- Set one: 0
- Set two: 1
- Set three: 2
- Set four: 3
- Set five: 4
- Set six: 5
- Set seven: 6
- Set eight: 7
- Set nine: 8
- Set ten: 9
Sets 1 to 3 provide almost no growth stimulus. Set 4 is slightly more effective and sets 5 to 10 are effective - in theory. I say "in theory" because due to the accumulation of volume you need to get to these effective sets, you are likely to increase your cortisol levels, which reduces your capacity for muscle growth. This is why studies show lower results with 10 sets.
However, there is one sticking point. The studies used a modified version of German Volume Training, starting with more weight (70 to 80% of maximum weight) and reducing this weight as fatigue set in.
This changes the program considerably compared to real German Volume Training. This makes the 10 x 10 program better in the early sets, as you achieve a lot of maximum effective repetitions instead of "wasting" the first sets. For example, if you use about 75% of your maximum weight on sets 1 and 2, 7 to 8 reps will be effective. That's 15 to 20 maximum effective repetitions for these two sets instead of one maximum effective repetition in real German Volume Training.
In these programs, the sets looked like this:
- Set one: 75% x 10
- Set two: 75% x 10
- Set three: 70% x 10
- Set four: 70% x 10
- Set five: 70% x 10
- Set six: 65% x 10
- Set seven: 65% x 10
- Set eight: 60% x 10
- Set nine: 60% x 10
- Set ten: 60% x 10
If they had used the Poliquin German Volume Setup instead, the gains would likely have been even lower due to the lower number of maximal effective repetitions.
In these studies, the subjects probably reached the maximum effective repetitions at the beginning due to the higher weight used. The results were worse than the other group either due to excessive cortisol release from the higher volume or due to excessive muscle damage preventing optimal recovery.
Muscle damage and cortisol
After you have trained a muscle, your body increases protein synthesis. This increase allows muscle damage caused by training to be repaired and new muscle tissue to be built.
This increase in protein synthesis lasts for 24 to 36 hours, depending on the training session. But your capacity to build muscle mass increases more for 24 to 30 hours and is only increased by 10 to 15% between 32 and 36 hours after training (compared to 110 to 120% after 24 hours).
It is important to understand that your capacity to build muscle decreases dramatically once you are outside of this time window.
You should also keep in mind that you must first repair the muscle damage before you can build new muscle tissue. If you generate so much muscle damage that it takes 28 hours to repair it, that leaves only 4 to 8 hours to build new muscle.
It's a real possibility that causing too much muscle damage results in lower gains simply because it takes longer to repair that damage, leaving less time to build muscle.
This is probably one of the reasons why the 5-set group achieved better results than the 10-set group in the first study.
If you look at the Poliquin version of German Volume Training, you have the following elements:
- A very high volume of non-productive repetitions: This will not result in much growth, just a lot of fatigue and used energy, in addition to increasing cortisol levels. Remember that volume is the primary driver when it comes to increasing cortisol release during training. The more energy you have to mobilize, the more cortisol you will release.
- An excessive number of repetitions causing muscle damage: Even though it is crucial to perform a sufficient number of maximally effective repetitions (15 to 30 for a muscle group per training session), too many repetitions are an excessive stressor from which you cannot recover sufficiently. In a German Volume workout, we have 45 of these repetitions - 15 more than the amount most people can handle.
And what about all those success stories
Fans of German Volume training will often say that the East German Olympic weightlifters used 10 x 10 to build five kilos of muscle and move up a weight class.
Really? Do you really think German Volume Training was responsible for the pace of their growth? East German athletes weren't exactly known for being natural. In fact, their systematic doping system was very developed even by Eastern Bloc standards.
I don't disparage something merely because steroid users did it. Many people who use steroids have contributed amazing things to knowledge in our field. However, when it comes to how much training you can handle, steroids make a huge difference. Why would a program that worked optimally for steroid users (who were also genetically predisposed to excellence) also be optimal for the average steroid-free exerciser?
And did the East German weightlifters actually use this approach? At one point, perhaps. But to claim that they used it to move up a weight class isn't really plausible if you know anything about Olympic weightlifting.
Good weightlifters will use every trick in the book to avoid moving up a weight class. They want to get stronger while staying lighter. They will only move up a weight class if they absolutely cannot manage to keep their weight down. They will not intentionally train to move up a weight class.
And then there's the claim that Jacques Demers used it to build up his monster legs. Yes Jacques had enormous legs. I remember training him when he was preparing his comeback at 45. His legs were massive back then and I imagine they were during his prime as well.
I asked him if he was still using German Volume Training and his response was "What's that?" When I explained to him that it was a system of 10 sets of 10 reps with consistent weight, he said "yes, I seem to remember using that once". In other words, it was just one of many methods he had used, but not an important one and not one that he continued to use.
And then there's the statement that German Volume Training was Vince Gironda's favorite method when it came to muscle growth.
No, it wasn't. Gironda used many methods and he was a fan of mathematically elegant programs. There was 6x6, 8x8 and 10x10. Yes, he occasionally used 10x10, but his two favorite schemes were 6x6 and 8x8. This fact does not discredit 10x10, but puts it in perspective.
Can we improve German Volume Training?
The only way to make German Volume Training better is to make it something other than German Volume Training. 10 sets of 10 reps is simply not an effective method - at least not compared to the hype surrounding it. If you're using steroids, then maybe, but if not, then you're not going to get what you're hoping for with German Volume Training.
The only way to make it work is to cut the volume in half. Doing 5 sets of 10 reps at 70 to 75% of your maximum weight will give you better results than 10 sets of 10 reps at 60 to 65% of your maximum weight.
If for some reason you are fixated on doing 10 sets, then you could do 10 sets of 5 reps at around 75 to 80% of your maximum weight. That would be slightly better, but probably too hard on the nervous system - and it could also cause too much muscle damage.
So it doesn't work?
I'm not saying that German Volume Training doesn't work. You can probably build some muscle and some strength with it. But the results won't live up to the hype and you'll be putting a lot of effort into something that would be better with half as many sets. But because of the myth of this program, people tend not to question it. And when exercisers use it, they subconsciously believe that it works well.
And even though being enthusiastic about a program can help you train harder and get better results, it can also cause you to lose your objectivity and end up limiting your progress because you make illogical and counterproductive choices.
References
- Effects of a Modified German Volume Training Program on Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: November 2017 - Volume 31 - Issue 11 - p 3109-3119
- Hackett, D.A.; Amirthalingam, T.; Mitchell, L.; Mavros, Y.; Wilson, G.C.; Halaki, M. Effects of a 12-Week Modified German Volume Training Program on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy-A Pilot Study. Sports 2018, 6, 7.
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/german-volume-training-the-real-story
By Christian Thibaudeau

Probably not, but there are real issues that can cause problems that people associate with adrenal fatigue.
Like many coaches, I used to believe in adrenal fatigue. The theory goes like this:
When you are constantly under stress, your adrenal glands work overtime and are forced to produce more stress hormones than they should. Over time, they become fatigued and are no longer able to produce stress hormones. The theory is that this leads to the body no longer being able to cope with stressful situations, resulting in a state of chronic fatigue.
The problem? The whole thing is pseudoscientific, has never been proven and is unlikely to actually happen.
This does not mean that people are lying about their symptoms. They are real and can be caused by excessive stress, stimulant abuse and other lifestyle issues that increase the production of stress hormones. However, they have nothing to do with exhaustion of the adrenal glands.
What symptoms are we talking about here? Here is what people generally experience when they suspect they are suffering from adrenal fatigue:
- A decrease in motivation
- Low energy
- A decrease in willpower/discipline
- Anhedonia (a lack of pleasure)
- Mood swings
- Disturbed sleep patterns
- Not feeling refreshed after a full night's sleep
- A decrease in physical and mental performance
What can cause these problems?
The most likely causes are as follows:
- A depletion of dopamine reserves
- Desensitization of the dopaminergic receptors
- Desensitization of the adrenergic receptors
- Depletion of norepinephrine reserves
Each of these situations will lead to the symptoms that we associate with adrenal fatigue. And all of these situations can occur when you are chronically under stress or overstressing your nervous system.
Depending on your individual brain chemistry, some of these will be more likely than others. For example, a person who is very sensitive to dopamine is more likely to suffer from depletion of dopamine reserves or desensitization of dopaminergic receptors. Why? Because this person is naturally very sensitive to dopamine, which is why this person does not produce large amounts of dopamine in the first place.
A person who is more sensitive to adrenaline has a higher risk of adrenergic resistance or depletion of noradrenaline stores. This is more widespread. About 14 to 20% of the population is dopamine dominant.
Still confused? Here's what you need to understand: Adrenaline and dopamine are neurotransmitters - chemicals that control your brain. They work by docking onto receptors and activating them. These receptors can be more sensitive or less sensitive. The more sensitive they are, the more strongly they react to neurotransmitters.
Dopamine and adrenaline are activating neurotransmitters. They activate the nervous system and increase motivation, willpower, drive, competitiveness and physical and mental performance. They also have their own effects depending on the part of the brain in which they act. Dopamine, for example, is the feel-good neurotransmitter.
The two are closely linked, as adrenaline is ultimately produced from dopamine. Dopamine can be converted into noradrenaline, which is then converted into adrenaline.
The more adrenaline you need to produce, the more dopamine you will need to consume. If you don't produce a lot of dopamine and use a lot of it to produce adrenaline, then you run the risk of depleting your dopamine stores. Let's take a closer look at this.
Depletion of the dopamine reserves
People with low dopamine production risk depleting their dopamine stores if they cause their body to release too much adrenaline by putting themselves in stressful situations. Different training variables will increase adrenaline release:
- Pace: A faster workout will result in the highest adrenaline production
- Volume: More volume means more adrenaline
- Mental stress: A maximum attempt can also increase the release of adrenaline
A person who naturally has low dopamine levels and trains at a high pace and high volume, always pushing themselves to the limit, risks depleting their dopamine stores.
Desensitization of the dopaminergic receptors
Another possibility is to make the dopaminergic receptors less sensitive. In this case, the effects are similar to those of depleting the dopamine stores: you have plenty of dopamine, but the receptors simply do not respond to it. This is far less common. It is unlikely to happen to the average person who leads a normal life and exercises. It is more likely to happen to people who abuse drugs or medications that directly target the dopamine receptors.
What types of drugs can make your dopamine receptors less sensitive? These are the most common:
- Cocaine
- amphetamines
- Ritalin
- methamphetamine
- nicotine
The use of these drugs can generate an enormous stimulus for the dopaminergic receptors. The receptors will adapt to this by becoming less sensitive to prevent continuous overstimulation. People who regularly abuse such substances can easily become resistant to dopamine.
Also, some anabolic steroids can stimulate the dopaminergic receptors, which can be the cause of steroid-related depression.
The other possibility, which is more common, is either desensitization of adrenergic receptors or depletion of norepinephrine stores.
Desensitization of the adrenergic receptors
It is very easy to desensitize the adrenergic receptors. Ask a bodybuilder who has used clenbuterol in the past. During the first day or two, clenbuterol gives a huge boost, causes tremors, provides monstrous energy, etc.
After 2 or 3 days the effects become more subtle and after a week you don't feel much of it. This is because the receptors are "down-regulated" or desensitized.
The problem with desensitizing the adrenergic receptors is that you no longer react to your own adrenaline. And this is what is responsible for low energy, lack of motivation, lack of discipline, poor self-esteem, poor performance, etc.
However, you don't have to use clenbuterol to desensitize your adrenergic receptors. These receptors are like the nitrous oxide injection of a race car: they are meant to provide a short-term boost in a critical situation. They are not meant to be active all the time.
If you are constantly under stress and releasing adrenaline, you can easily make your receptors resistant. This is most often the case when we mistakenly talk about "adrenal fatigue".
Depletion of the noradrenaline stores
A final possibility is depletion of noradrenaline stores. This can be caused by a chronic and excessive increase in cortisol levels. In addition to being an enemy of muscle building, cortisol is also what increases the conversion of norepinephrine to adrenaline. The more cortisol you produce, the more noradrenaline is converted into adrenaline. Symptoms of depletion of noradrenaline stores include
- Low energy
- A lack of focus
- Concentration problems
- Disorganization
- Low blood sugar levels
The bottom line? Excessively and chronically elevated cortisol levels can lead to what we think of as adrenal fatigue, either depleting norepinephrine levels (which is easier to fix) or desensitizing adrenergic receptors (harder to fix).
How do you know which of the two it is?
Apart from blood tests, you can mainly rely on observation. However, there is a test that can help you narrow down the causes.
Take 7 grams of tyrosine in the morning on an empty stomach, wait 30 minutes and then see how you feel. Compare this to how you normally feel in the morning.
- If you feel great 30m minutes after taking tyrosine - much better and more energized than usual - then the problem is probably a depletion of dopamine reserves (tyrosine is used to make dopamine).
- If you feel good - but not like you've found a mash silver bullet - then it's probably a depletion of noradrenaline reserves. In this case, it may take 45 minutes before you start to feel a little better. This is because dopamine is produced from tyrosine, which then increases the levels of noradrenaline.
- If you still feel low after 30 to 45 minutes and you don't feel any difference, then it's probably adrenergic desensitization.
The first two cases share the same basic solution: an increase in dopamine levels. Here it can be helpful to supplement a form of tyrosine and to ensure an adequate intake of vitamin B6, which is needed to produce dopamine. In addition to this, taking Rhodiola can help, which extends the lifespan of dopamine.
If your problem is a depletion of noradrenaline stores, then it may make sense to reduce your cortisol levels by taking 3 to 5 grams of glycine and a serving of magnesium (500 mg) after training and in the evening. Glycine is a neurological inhibitor that reduces cortisol release due to over-activation and magnesium can separate adrenaline from the adrenergic receptors.
If your problem is based on adrenergic desensitization, then taking magnesium (500 mg) three to four times a day may help to prevent excessive binding of adrenaline to the receptors. The same applies to an increase in meal frequency and carbohydrate intake.
A higher meal frequency and more frequent carbohydrate intake will reduce adrenaline production by directly and indirectly reducing cortisol release, which in turn will reduce the conversion of noradrenaline to adrenaline. If you are a carbohydrate-phobe, you may be afraid of getting fat. You may also gain a pound or two in the process. But that's nothing compared to the long-term damage caused by resistant receptors.
In terms of training, all of these situations require that you reduce your training volume by about 40 to 50%, that you reduce your frequency (do only three to four workouts per week), that you lengthen your rest intervals, and that you stay away from intensity techniques until the problem is resolved.
The training of natural trainers vs. steroid users
How important is it for a trainer to know if a bodybuilder they are training is using steroids or other performance enhancing substances? Does this change the way that athlete should train?
This question is super important because you can't train steroid-free athletes and steroid users the same way unless you're talking about a natural trainer who is a genetic freak in the muscle-building department.
But these athletes are rare and make up less than 1 to 2% of the population. The normal steroid-free exerciser does not have the advantages that steroid users and genetic freaks benefit from and cannot tolerate the same amount of training. Here are the main differences:
Frequency per muscle
Anabolic steroids activate protein synthesis and this remains permanently elevated, meaning that these exercisers do not need to train a muscle as often to achieve maximum growth. A steroid-free exerciser will only increase protein synthesis when training a muscle and the increase in protein synthesis will only last for 24 to 36 hours.
Thus, a steroid-free exerciser should train a muscle two to three times a week for maximum growth, while the chemically-assisted exerciser can achieve good growth even if they only train a muscle hard once a week (although again, I think two workouts a week would be better).
Volume
Chemically assisted exercisers can recover better from high volume. For them, muscle damage repair is faster and easier due to increased protein synthesis. This is why the approach of completely destroying a muscle once a week is popular and works well for these exercisers, but doesn't work as well for the average natural exerciser.
In addition, the frequency with which a muscle is trained and the training volume per training session are inversely proportional to each other: the more often you train a muscle, the less volume per training session you can use. A steroid-free exerciser should train a muscle more often for optimal results, which is another reason why they should not do so with a high volume per training session.
Number of exercises
This goes along the same lines as the volume component. A chemically assisted trainee can recover and grow sufficiently even at high volume, which is why they can perform more exercises per muscle group.
If you're like most bodybuilders, then you probably believe that you have to bomb a muscle from every angle. Well, a steroid-free exerciser has to be more careful with exercise selection. Since he can't recover as well and can't tolerate as much volume, he can't use a myriad of exercises per training session. He must choose his exercises very carefully and opt for exercises that offer him the most for his efforts.
He should avoid redundant exercises (e.g. bench press followed by dumbbell bench press followed by bench press on the multi press) and avoid unnecessary volume (exercises that have little to offer in terms of additional benefits).
Whether a steroid-free exerciser can train with heavy weights has more to do with the CNS, meaning that both steroid users and natural exercisers can train heavy if they have the nervous system for it.
How can you find out if you have the nervous system for it?
- Are you at the end 2 to 3 hours after a heavy training session?
- Are you cranky and unmotivated the day after a training session with heavy weights?
- Is your resting heart rate significantly elevated the morning after a heavy training session?
- Do you have a drop in libido after a few weeks of heavy training?
- Do you have trouble sleeping even when you train heavy if you train early in the day?
If this applies to you, then you don't have the nervous system to tolerate a lot of heavy training.
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-52
https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-53
By Christian Thibaudeau

Q: How can I maintain my strength while I define?
A: Many things can contribute to strength. Therefore, you can lose strength while dieting for many reasons. The two main reasons for losing strength as you get leaner are:
- You lose muscle. This is the most obvious reason. But this should never happen unless you're trying to get below 8 percent body fat. If you continue to train hard (but smart), maintain a high protein intake (2.7 to 3.5 grams per kilogram of body weight) and keep to an acceptable calorie deficit (no more than 1 kilo weight loss per week), you won't lose muscle.
- You will lose tension. This is the most common reason for loss of strength. Usually you will get weaker on the big multi-joint exercises (bench press, overhead press and squats), but your strength on isolation exercises will stay the same or even increase.
As you lose muscle glycogen, intramuscular fat, water and fat, your strength leverage ratios will get worse while your joints will be less compressed. When you accumulate a lot of glycogen, water and fat within the muscles, you generate a certain amount of pressure around the joints that stabilizes them. This passive stabilization makes you stronger. If you lose it, your body feels less secure and strength production is more easily inhibited as a protective mechanism.
Let's address the muscle loss thing
The reason people lose muscle while dieting is NOT calorie restriction. To maintain or even increase muscle mass, your body needs protein and adequate amounts of calories to fuel the repair process. "But if I'm in a calorie deficit, then I don't have enough calories for the repair process," you might be saying.
Really? If you're in a calorie deficit, you're still walking around, moving and exercising, right? Of course you do! But you're in a deficit... by definition, you're not eating enough calories to fuel all that. How can you still function?
Well, by using stored energy. And you can do the same to get energy for muscle repair and the growth process. Even in a strict calorie deficit, as long as your protein intake is adequate, you should still be able to repair your muscles and even build some muscle by relying on stored energy and the protein you consume.
I'm not saying that you can build as much muscle mass as you normally would during a deficit. If you eat less - especially if your carbohydrate intake is lower - then you will have lower mTOR and IGF-1 levels, which can make it harder to build muscle. But you should still be able to maintain what you have. So why do people lose muscle when they're dieting and it's not due to a calorie deficit? Because they are afraid of losing muscle. This leads to the fulfillment of this fear.
Let's say an exerciser decides to get defined. He reduces his calories and perhaps also starts doing cardio training. In the beginning, he feels thinner in his clothes without looking defined. It is also harder to get a pump (due to the reduced carbohydrate and sodium intake). In his mind, this must all be related to losing muscle.
So what does he do? He trains with higher volume and higher intensity. He goes to muscle failure more often, uses a plethora of intensity techniques such as descending sets, rest-pause and supersets in 90 to 120 minute workouts with short rest intervals.
The higher volume and higher intensity both dramatically increase cortisol levels. Cortisol levels are already elevated during a diet anyway (since cortisol is involved in mobilizing energy). And this chronic increase in cortisol secretion greatly increases the risk of muscle loss, as cortisol breaks down muscle tissue.
You also generate a lot more muscle damage. Under normal circumstances this would be good, as you need this muscle damage for muscle growth. However, if you cause so much damage that you can't fully repair it before the protein synthesis rate drops again (24 to 36 hours after your workout), then you may lose muscle.
If you are dieting, you should not try to use your weight training to burn more calories (by increasing volume), nor should you panic and increase volume. When you diet, your capacity to tolerate volume and grow is lower. You need to do less rather than more. Instead, just make sure you give your sets your all.
The loss of tension or joint stability
This is probably the main cause of strength loss during a diet - especially at the beginning of a diet.
The more stable a joint involved in an exercise is, the stronger you will be. If the joint is more stable, then there will be less 'leakage' in strength development. In addition, if your body feels insecure, it will not allow you to use your full strength potential.
During a fat loss diet you lose...
- Subcutaneous fat
- Intramuscular fat
- Muscle glycogen
- Intramuscular water
- Extracellular water
When you lose intramuscular fat, muscle glycogen and intramuscular water, you "let the air out of the muscles". As a result, the muscles no longer put as much pressure on the joints. The bigger your muscles are, the more stable the joint is.
If this happens, you will lose strength in multi-joint exercises - primarily in pressing exercises, as the shoulder joint is a very unstable joint.
Your performance on squats will also decrease, whereas deadlifts and pulls will not be affected as much. Interestingly, despite the loss of strength in the big multi-joint exercises, you will be just as strong or even stronger in isolation exercises or machine exercises for muscles involved in the heavy multi-joint exercises. Your bench press performance will decrease, but you'll probably be just as strong as before on exercises like tricep presses, butterflies and side raises.
With less stable joints, every weight will feel heavier from the moment you take it off the rack. You will feel it in your bones. The eccentric/negative part of the movement will also be significantly heavier and more painful than before.
I once lost 3.5 kilos in three days due to dehydration. My bench press performance promptly dropped by 30 kilos.
But what can you do to prevent this from happening?
1. keep your sodium intake high
When you start a diet - or if you simply want to optimize your current diet - your sodium intake will usually drop significantly. This can lead to a loss of water and pump. Therefore, keep your sodium intake high if you want to maintain your strength (and your pump).
Sodium will help keep your muscles fuller and is also involved in muscle contraction. I like to use an electrolyte mix here to help me maintain the ideal amount of intramuscular water. In addition to this, I recommend consuming Himalayan salt with meals.
2. include exercises that focus on eccentric and isometric training in your training program
Using slow eccentric repetitions (negative repetitions) in your heavy multi-joint exercises (anything between 5 and 10 seconds) will help you improve your motor control and keep everything tight. This type of training also strengthens the tendons.
Both elements will make the body feel more secure and, as a result, allow you to use a greater proportion of your strength. Perform additional isometric holds during the eccentric phase of the movement (1 to 3 pauses per repetition lasting 2 to 6 seconds depending on the number of pauses).
During an isometric action, the synergist and antagonist contract more than during concentric actions. This develops the capacity to stabilize the joint, which increases your capacity to use your strength potential.
For example, we had the professional beach volleyball player Diana Gordon perform 6 repetitions with 100 kilos and an eccentric repetition lasting 5 seconds.
I recommended the following for the break:
- (usually in the middle range) 5 to 6 seconds, 1 pause per repetition
- (usually in the middle range and just before the lowest point) 3 to 4 seconds, 2 pauses per repetition
- (upper third, in the middle range and just before the lowest point) 2 to 3 seconds, 3 pauses per repetition
3, Use a higher frequency for the heavy basic exercises
The more often you perform the heavy basic exercises, the more efficient you will become and the more likely you are to maintain or even increase your strength. The approach I use is to train the three key basic exercises three times a week. One day I focus on the eccentric part of the movement, another day on the isometric part and the third day on regular training.
4. don't panic
When you are dieting there will come a time when you feel lean, you find it hard to get a pump and you don't look any better. Don't be too emotional. Keep your head down and resist the urge to increase your volume or perform nonsensical exercises.
Maximizing performance in powerlifting
Q: I am a powerlifter at competition level and eat six meals a day. What should I do about carbs and unloading to maximize my performance?
A: A lot of the information we find about achieving maximum performance for a competition revolves around supercompensation. You dramatically increase your training volume and intensity for 7 to 14 days before reducing your training stress and increasing carbohydrate intake a week before the event to achieve supercompensation. This leads to an increase in performance.
It sounds scientific and intelligent, but does it work?
Well, that all depends. If you're an endurance athlete, then it might work. It seems to work pretty well for swimmers. However, if you're a strength athlete, then it won't do anything. It will give you the illusion that it works, but it won't. Here's the reasoning.
When we talk about supercompensation, we're really talking about increasing the amount of glycogen stores in the muscles. The theory? By dramatically increasing training volume and reducing carbohydrate intake, the body will upregulate the levels of the enzymes responsible for glycogen storage. If you then flood your body with carbohydrates and reduce your volume for 3 to 7 days before the competition, the body will store more glycogen than normal and without this depletion.
By storing more glycogen (supercompensation) you should theoretically have more energy available for a competition and be able to perform better. This can work if your sport is dependent on the amount of stored glycogen you have.
Endurance athletes can benefit from a larger glycogen store and glycolytic sports will certainly benefit from this. But strength sports such as powerlifting and weightlifting are not dependent on glycogen stores, as ATP-CP is the primary source of energy in these sports.
Although glycogen supercompensation could help with bench presses and possibly squats by leading to increased passive joint stability, it is certainly the primary driver of performance.
Does this mean you shouldn't unload? No, you should. But you need to understand what unloading does in order to plan it properly. It also means that you shouldn't do one to two weeks of stress with increased volume and intensity before unloading to achieve a supercompensation effect.
You cannot supercompensate the nervous system. The same applies to the endocrine system or your muscle mass. Just because you can beat up these systems by training too much in a short time does not mean that there will be a rebound with better performance. The nervous system and the endocrine system do not work in the same way as the glycogen storage system.
Here's what happens during an unload that can give you the illusion of a supercomposition of neurological resources.
First, you need to understand two things
1. the link between cortisol and adrenaline
Cortisol increases the conversion of noradrenaline to adrenaline. The more cortisol you produce, the more your adrenaline levels will rise.
Four primary training variables can lead to an increase in cortisol levels (and therefore adrenaline levels) during training:
- The volume: the more energy you need, the more cortisol you release.
- Intensity: The closer you get to the point of muscle failure during your sets, the more cortisol you will produce.
- Psychological stress: This point is the least related to your training.
- The neurological demands: Learning new exercises, using more complex exercises, or using a complicated training structure.
2. beta-adrenergic downregulation
When you overstimulate the beta-adrenergic receptors, they are downregulated. In layman's terms, this means that these receptors downregulate their sensitivity when you produce large amounts of adrenaline. As a result, you respond less and less strongly to adrenaline.
Since adrenaline increases strength, contraction speed and motivation, your strength will decrease if you are less responsive to adrenaline. On the other hand, the more sensitive your receptors are, the better you will respond to adrenaline and the more strength your muscles will produce.
Putting it all together
When you dramatically increase training volume and intensity (stress week), you produce more cortisol. This leads to high adrenaline levels. These high adrenaline levels can downregulate the beta-adrenergic receptors, reducing your strength potential.
After this week of stress, you feel low and your performance drops. You then carry out the unloading, reduce the volume, intensity and perhaps also the frequency. You also cut out supportive exercises, which also reduces the neurological demands.
All of this leads to a reduction in cortisol levels and, in turn, much lower adrenaline levels. The beta-adrenergic receptors are now much less stimulated and return to their normal reactivity. Now you respond to your adrenaline again. You regain your strength and motivation. You think "My discharge has worked, I have achieved supercompensation.
No, you haven't. You have merely restored your reactivity to adrenaline, which you had previously lost through too much training.
A study by Fry et al (2006) found a 37% downregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors after just two weeks of very high-intensity/high-frequency exercise. After only one or two weeks of high-intensity training before a competition, this downregulation can cause a significant reduction in performance of 5 to 10%.
But why would you intentionally cause such a downregulation just to bring the sensitivity of the receptors back to normal levels by unloading? There is no benefit in doing so and you risk not being able to fully restore the sensitivity of your receptors. You also risk injuring yourself during this phase of high volume/high frequency training.
In addition to this, there is a good chance that some down-regulation has already taken place before the stress week(s). And the stress of the upcoming competition will further increase cortisol release (psychological stress), which will further increase your adrenaline levels - which in turn will lead to further desensitization.
My recommendation is to unload to make your beta-adrenergic receptors as sensitive as possible, but not to precede this unloading phase with a phase of dramatically increased training stress.
Such an unloading phase would look like this
Run your regular program and unload one week before the competition as follows: Assuming the competition is on a Saturday, skip all supportive training one week before.
- Saturday (seven days until the competition): Work your way up to your first set of work on squats and bench presses. Perform three single repetitions of deadlifts at 90% of your first working set.
- Sunday (six days until the competition): No training
- Monday (five days until the competition): Squats 3 x 2 with 90% of your usual first work set, bench press 3 x 2 with 90% of your usual first work set, deadlift 3 x 1 with 80% of your usual first work set.
- Tuesday (four days until the competition): No training
- Wednesday (three days until the competition): Squats 3 x 2 with 80% of your usual first work set, bench press 3 x 2 with 80% of your usual first work set
- Thursday (two days until the competition) no training
- Friday (one day until the competition): Activation - squats 3 x 1 with 70% of your usual first work set, bench press 3 x 1 with 70% of your usual first work set
- Saturday: Competition
For the unload we have:
- Extremely low volume
- Zero complexity (minimalist workouts)
- Low intensity (each exercise with 3 to 4 repetitions in reserve)
- Low psychological stress
- Low neurological demands
You will minimize your cortisol response as much as possible, which lowers adrenaline levels and increases beta-adrenergic receptor reactivity.
Nutrition and supplement strategies
Here are some strategies you can use to maximize the reactivity of these receptors:
Workout days
- Reduce stress: Take 200 mg of Rhodiola in the morning. As an adaptogen, it allows the body to cope better with stress. It does this, among other things, by balancing the levels of dopamine, serotonin and adrenaline.
- Promoting the function of the nervous system: A combination of tyrosine, phosphatidylcholine and DMAE will optimize the function of the nervous system. During unloading, dopamine levels drop and the nervous system becomes sluggish. This leads to a reduction in performance.
- Pre-workout: Consume carbohydrates - e.g. in the form of cyclic dextrins -, EAAs and citrulline before training. This can help to train the release of cortisol during training.
- Magnesium or ZMA: Take magnesium or ZMA after training and in the evening. Magnesium will reduce the binding of adrenaline to the beta-adrenergic receptors. This will calm you down and make it easier for the receptors to restore their sensitivity. The less adrenaline binds to the receptors, the faster the upregulation will take place. Use 500 mg of magnesium. This dose should be sufficient for this purpose, although you can go up to 1000 mg in the evening.
- Glycine: Take glycine after training and in the evening. Glycine inhibits (calms) the nervous system by lowering cortisol and adrenaline levels. Glycine also increases mTOR activation after training, which can increase the rate of protein synthesis and accelerate muscle repair. Take three to five grams after training and in the evening.
Non-training days
Only take rhodiola, tyrosine, phosphatidylcholine and DMAE, as well as magnesium or ZMA in the evening.
Note: Creatine could also help you, which is primarily based on an increase in cell volumization, which can help with passive joint stability and make you stronger. If you are already taking creatine, continue to take it until the competition. If you have used it in the past and tolerated it well, then take 10 grams per day during the week before the competition.
If you have suffered from digestive problems when taking creatine in the past, do not use creatine. Even if you are just under the weight limit for your weight class, you should avoid creatine as it can add a kilo to your body weight.
As for your food intake, a lot depends on where you are relative to your competition weight. Ideally, you should keep carbohydrates high during this week to lower cortisol levels and keep glycogen stores full. Fuller glycogen stores will help generate passive stability - which is especially true for the shoulder joint and should help you move more weight on bench presses and squats.
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-58
https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-59
By Christian Thibaudeau

Q: How accurate are those watches where you can see how many calories you've burned during a training session?
A: They are not really accurate. A friend of mine recently told me that she did a training session with weights in which she burned 960 kcal. And even though I would really like to believe that - because it would make training with weights the best fat loss tool known to man - it's simply not realistic.
It's hard to know exactly how many calories you've burned during a training session. This depends on the exercises (squats use more energy than deadlifts), the number of repetitions completed, the training methods and the amount of muscle fibers recruited during each repetition.
For upper body exercises, a hypertrophy set lasting 40 to 60 seconds will burn perhaps 7 to 10 kcal, while a set of squats lasting one minute can burn up to 40 kcal (Victor M. Reis, R. S. 2011. Energy Cost of Resistance Exercises: J Hum Kinet. 29A: 33-39).
If you do four sets of this, we are talking about 160 kcal. If you perform another multi-joint exercise during the same training session, this could add another 160 kcal. If four smaller exercises follow, this could add 350 to 400 kcal. Such a training session would burn 650 to 700 cal and would be one hell of a workout.
A hypertrophy training session for the upper body could burn 250 to 400 kcal on top of your normal daily calorie consumption. For the lower body it could be 500 to 700 kcal on top of your normal calorie burn and a total body training session could be in the 300 to 500 kcal range.
I believe that the calorie consumption estimated by these watches/apps is mainly based on the measured heart rate as the basis for calorie consumption. These formulas were developed with cardio training in mind. In this type of training, the heart rate is directly proportional to the rate of energy expenditure because the heart rate only increases in response to the need for the heart to pump more blood to the muscles to provide oxygen for energy production.
However, when training with weights, the increase in heart rate can also be due to a high release of adrenaline. In addition, the heart rate may increase for the duration of the set and then remain elevated during breaks due to adrenaline/neuronal activation even though you are not continuing to exercise. As a result, these tools will dramatically overestimate the amount of calories burned during a training session with weights.
Why is this a problem? By giving you the impression that you are consuming a ton of calories, you can easily be tempted to eat more than you consume. "I just burned 1200 kcal during my weight training session! Now I can eat a hamburger because it only has 600 kcal!"
No, you can't. In the grand scheme of things, this isn't the end of the world, but it's still misleading.
Realistic gains at an age over 40
Q: How much muscle mass can a steroid-free, advanced trainee build in their forties?
A: I'd love to tell you that an advanced exerciser can continue to build tons of muscle in their forties...in part because I'm over 40 myself. But that would be a lie.
It's not even a matter of age (although that does play a role), it's a matter of training experience and adaptation. For me, "advanced exerciser" means at least 15 years of hard training. This means that you have already built up a lot of muscle. The human body has a limited capacity to build and maintain muscle without chemical support. This depends to a large extent on your genetics. ACTN3 genotype, myostatin levels, body structure and many other factors come into play here.
We don't fully understand all of these factors yet, but the fact is that the average man can gain about 15 to 20 kilos of muscle over the course of his training career beyond the weight he would have without training. Of course, anabolic steroids can overcome many of these limiting factors that prevent a steroid-free trainee from reaching the level of a Mr. Olympia.
I'm talking about pure muscle weight here. In addition to those 15 to 20 kilos, you will probably also build up a few extra kilos in the form of glycogen, water and collagen. Not to mention that you can also gain some fat and still look great. Over the course of your training career, you may put on 25 to 30 kilos of weight on the scale, but only 15 to 20 kilos of that will be muscle.
The closer you get to those 15 to 20 kilos, the slower and heavier your gains will be.
So let's take a 40-year-old man who would weigh about 78 kilos without training. Let's say that after 15 years of training he now weighs around 95 kilos with a similar or better body fat percentage.
Because he has been training all these years, he has built up around 15 to 17 kilos of muscle. Realistically, he can now build a maximum of 3 to 5 kilos of muscle.
If a second 40 year old man has only built 5 kilos of muscle over the course of his training career (because he has not consistently trained hard and intelligently), then he has the potential to build more muscle than the person who has trained properly.
Why will the more dedicated and experienced exerciser have a harder time building a lot of muscle? First of all, because of adaptation. His body is already well adapted to the training. It is very difficult at this point to do a workout that is still stressful for the body. If the training is no longer stressful for the body, then the body will not change further because no additional muscles are needed to do the work.
If you want to increase training stress, then you need to:
- Move more weight or.
- Complete a higher volume or...
- Push yourself harder during your sets
But there's a catch here. All three of these things can increase your cortisol levels and hinder your progress. What's more, you can't keep increasing these factors. There will come a point where it will be difficult to increase the weight of an exercise by 5 kilos over a period of 6 to 8 weeks. And if you are already going to muscle failure or close to muscle failure, then there is not much room for an increase here either.
And increasing volume is one of the best ways to stall progress, especially for older exercisers. It's also often not really practical in the real world. A normal person with a job and family can't spend 2 to 3 hours in the gym every day. An advanced exerciser needs an extremely high training stress to keep progressing, but doing so could also do more harm than good.
As you get older, your physiology changes - and not for the better when it comes to building muscle:
- Testosterone levels tend to drop
- Growth hormone and IGF-1 levels can drop
- The number of stem cells decreases due to lower IGF-1 levels. Stem cells are needed to repair muscle damage. Fewer stem cells mean that you can no longer repair muscle damage and build muscle as easily.
- Your body is more likely to suffer from systemic inflammation. This can significantly reduce your capacity to build muscle, partly because inflammation can reduce insulin sensitivity.
- You lose nerve cells and have atrophy in others. This will reduce your strength. And when your strength decreases, it can become harder to maintain muscle or build new muscle tissue. Muscle tissue is adapted to a certain level of load. If your nerves no longer allow you to produce as much force, then the reduced level of muscle tension that occurs during exercise may not be sufficient to stimulate muscle growth.
Lastly, life tends to take over as you get older. If you have a full-time job and a family, then you also have a lot more stress. This can also affect your capacity to make progress.
And now for the good news
Don't stop trying to improve because it's always possible to surprise yourself and achieve more than you thought possible. I'm in the best shape of my life at 41 and I'm still able to improve. Here are a few guidelines that can help older exercisers make progress;
1. don't always train hard
I know this seems counter intuitive, but periods of maintenance training can help make your body more receptive to training again. Call it strategic deconditioning if you like.
Perform the minimum necessary to avoid muscle loss for 3 to 5 weeks. If you are a dedicated exerciser, this will be less than you think. Reduce your volume, don't push yourself so hard on your sets (finish the set 2 to 3 reps before reaching muscle failure) and focus more on technique than load.
I like to do three full body workouts per week, using 3 to 4 exercises per workout. After this phase, you can push yourself hard for 6 to 8 weeks, increasing the demands of your workouts every two weeks or so.
I discovered this strategy when I started doing more seminars. I spent a phase of four weeks working out two to three times a week, not having the energy to push myself hard. However, when I went back to serious training afterwards, I exceeded my previous results.
2. use a specialization approach
This is something I started doing with high level bodybuilders to exceed a growth plateau.
If you are more advanced, then you need a serious stimulus to force the body to adapt. But at the same time, if you increase the overall training stress, eventually you won't be able to recover. Specialization is an excellent way to achieve this strong stimulus without overloading the body excessively.
Choose one or two muscle groups (or a heavy basic exercise) to focus on. Train these three days a week and the rest of the body once a week at maintenance level (either by training everything during one training session or by splitting it into two training sessions. Then focus on different muscle groups or a new exercise every four weeks.
3. focus on the look you want to achieve
There is a phenomenon I call muscle migration. If you reach an overall muscle mass that is close to your limit, you can still achieve an aesthetic evolution of your body by changing where those muscles are located.
- If I train like an Olympic weightlifter or an athlete, then my hamstrings, middle back and gluteus will improve, but I will lose some mass in my arms and chest.
- If I train more like a bodybuilder, then my chest, arms and quadriceps will improve, but I will lose some mass in my glutes and hamstrings.
- If I train like a disc jumper, then my chest, arms and shoulders will improve, but I will lose mass in the lower body. In all three scenarios, my weight will remain in the 100 kilo range, but the visual impression will be very different.
If you are approaching the maximum muscle mass you can achieve, then you should rely on developing the muscles that will give you the look you want. Deliberately place muscles that are not needed for that look second. This is very similar to specialization but without rotation every four weeks.
4. get lean
Everyone looks better when they are leaner. If you can no longer build a ton of muscle, then you can still improve your look by becoming more defined. I've talked about how I achieved my best look at 41. I was indeed less bulky than earlier in my life, but because I was leaner, the overall look was better. Even if you don't build muscle, you'll still look fantastic if you achieve a real 8 percent body fat percentage.
5. reduce inflammation and improve your insulin sensitivity
If you're older, these two factors are largely responsible for preventing you from building muscle and getting leaner. Your lifestyle and diet will play a big part in this.
If you want to take prevention a step further, fish oil capsules and curcumin are great for reducing underlying systemic inflammation.
It would be nice if we could build muscle by the day we stop exercising. Sadly, this will not be the case. But even if building muscle is harder to achieve, you can always find ways to improve.
Source: https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-57
https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-58
By Christian Thibaudeau